Skip to main content

Effect of Choice of Discretization Methods on Context Extraction from Sensor Data – An Empirical Evaluation

  • Conference paper
Distributed Computing and Internet Technology (ICDCIT 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8337))

  • 1454 Accesses

Abstract

Data from sensor logs in raw form is generally continuous valued. This data from multiple sensors in continuous stream becomes voluminous. For knowledge discovery like extraction of context, from these datasets, standard machine learning algorithms or their variations are used as classifier. Most classification schemes require the input data to be discretized. The focus of this paper is to study merits of some popular discretization methods when applied on noisy sensor logs. Representative methods from supervised and unsupervised discretization, like binning, clustering and entropy minimization are evaluated with context extraction. Interestingly, unlike common perception, for discretization of sensor data, supervised algorithms do not have a clear edge over unsupervised.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. McGrath, M., Dishongh, T.: Wireless Sensor Networks for Healthcare Applications. Artech House, London (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Figo, D., Diniz, P.C., Ferreira, D.R., Cardoso, J.M.: Preprocessing techniques for context recognition from accelerometer data. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 14(7), 645–662 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Randell, C., Muller, H.: Context awareness by analysing accelerometer data. In: Proceedings of The Fourth International Symposium on Wearable Computers, pp. 175–176. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Roggen, D., et al.: Collecting complex activity data sets in highly rich networked sensor environments. In: Seventh International Conference on Networked Sensing Systems, Kassel, Germany (June 2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kulkarni, R.V., Anna, F., Kumar, G.V.: Computational intelligence in wireless sensor networks: A survey. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials 13(1), 68–96 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Mittal, S., Aggarwal, A., Maskara, S.L.: Application of Bayesian Belief Networks for context extraction from wireless sensors data. In: Proceedings of 14th International Conference on Advanced Communication Technology (ICACT), South Korea,, pp. 410–415 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Mittal, S., Gopal, K., Maskara, S.L.: A Versatile Lattice Based Model for Situation Recognition from Dynamic Ambient Sensors. International Journal on Smart Sensing and Intelligent Systems 6(1), 403–432 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Chmielewski, M.R., Grzymala-Busse, J.W.: Global discretization of continuous attributes as preprocessing for machine learning. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 15(4), 319–331 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Gemmeke, J.F., Van Hamme, H., Cranen, B., Boves, L.: Compressive sensing for missing data imputation in noise robust speech recognition. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 4(2), 272–287 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mittal, S., Aggarwal, A., Maskara, S.L.: Online Cleaning of Wireless Sensor Data Resulting in Improved Context Extraction. International Journal of Computer Applications 60(15), 24–32 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Claudio, B., et al.: A survey of context modelling and reasoning techniques. Pervasive Mobile Computing 6(2), 161–180 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fatourechi, M., et al.: Comparison of evaluation metrics in classification applications with imbalanced datasets. In: Seventh IEEE International Conference on Machine Learning and Applications, pp. 777–782 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mittal, S., Gopal, K., Maskara, S.L. (2014). Effect of Choice of Discretization Methods on Context Extraction from Sensor Data – An Empirical Evaluation. In: Natarajan, R. (eds) Distributed Computing and Internet Technology. ICDCIT 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8337. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04483-5_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04483-5_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04482-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04483-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics