Skip to main content

Checking Internal Consistency of SOFL Specification: A Hybrid Approach

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8332))

Abstract

A SOFL specification can be written with errors inside, leading to an untrustable situation for implementation. Some techniques, such as specification review and testing, have been proposed to detect and remove the errors from the specification as early as possible. Meanwhile these techniques face strong challenges when applied to practice in that they strongly rely on human intelligence to either cautiously design a review task tree for directing the whole review process, or design some test inputs to “run” the specification. The completeness of the review or testing tasks also remains a problem. In this paper we propose a hybrid approach to checking the internal consistency of a SOFL specification. The internal consistency is an important property indicating that the entire specification can work properly. The essential idea of the hybrid approach is to adopt the different strategies to check the different aspects of the specification: concrete or abstract values are used to check the satisfiability of a process, and the symbolic execution and the deduction techniques can be used to check the internal consistency of the specification at the integration level. We also use a Sort-Search example to illustrate the use of the hybrid approach.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Liu, S., McDermid, J.A., Chen, Y.: A rigorous method for inspection of model-based formal specifications. IEEE Trans. Reliab. 59(4), 667–684 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu, S.: Formal Engineering for Industrial Software Development. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, S.: Utilizing specification testing in review task trees for rigorous review of formal specification. In: APSEC, pp. 510–519 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Liu, S., Tamai, T., Nakajima, S.: A framework for integrating formal specification, review, and testing to enhance software reliability. Int. J. Softw. Eng. Knowl. Eng. 21(2), 259–288 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Sen, K., Agha, G.: CUTE and jCUTE: concolic unit testing and explicit path model-checking tools. In: Ball, T., Jones, R.B. (eds.) CAV 2006. LNCS, vol. 4144, pp. 419–423. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ma, K.-K., Khoo, Y.P., Foster, J.S., Hicks, M.: Directed symbolic execution. In: Yahav, Eran (ed.) SAS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6887, pp. 95–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barnett, M., DeLine, R., Fähndrich, M., Jacobs, B., Leino, K.R.M., Schulte, W., Venter, H.: The spec# programming system: challenges and directions. In: Meyer, B., Woodcock, J. (eds.) VSTTE 2005. LNCS, vol. 4171, pp. 144–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Liu, S., Chen, Y., Nagoya, F., McDermid, J.A.: Formal specification-based inspection for verification of programs. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 38(5), 1100–1122 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen, Y.-T., Liu, S., Nagoya, F.: An approach to integration testing based on data flow specifications. In: Liu, Z., Araki, K. (eds.) ICTAC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3407, pp. 235–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Berre, D.L., Parrain, A.: The Sat4j library, release 2.2. JSAT 7(2–3), 59–64 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarke, E.M., Wing, J.M.: Formal methods: state of the art and future directions. ACM Comput. Surv. 28(4), 626–643 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Vaziri, M., Jackson, D.: Checking properties of heap-manipulating procedures with a constraint solver. In: Garavel, H., Hatcliff, J. (eds.) TACAS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2619, pp. 505–520. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gogolla, M., Bohling, J., Richters, M.: Validation of UML and OCL models by automatic snapshot generation. In: Stevens, P., Whittle, J., Booch, G. (eds.) UML 2003. LNCS, vol. 2863, pp. 265–279. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pasareanu, C.S., Visser, W., Bushnell, D.H., Geldenhuys, J., Mehlitz, P.C., Rungta, N.: Symbolic pathfinder: integrating symbolic execution with model checking for java bytecode analysis. Autom. Softw. Eng. 20(3), 391–425 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Cadar, C., Dunbar, D., Engler, D.R.: Klee: Unassisted and automatic generation of high-coverage tests for complex systems programs. In: OSDI, pp. 209–224 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their valuable and thorough comments. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 91118004 and 61100051) and Shanghai Key Laboratory of Computer Software Testing and Evaluating (Grant No. SSTL2011_02).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuting Chen .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chen, Y. (2014). Checking Internal Consistency of SOFL Specification: A Hybrid Approach. In: Liu, S., Duan, Z. (eds) Structured Object-Oriented Formal Language and Method. SOFL+MSVL 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8332. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04915-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-04915-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-04914-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-04915-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics