Skip to main content

How to Use Activity Theory Contradiction Concept to Support Organization Control

  • Conference paper
Book cover New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, Volume 2

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 276))

Abstract

Despite the existing organization control model, it isn’t clear how people choose the appropriate measures, norms and the control values and how to relate them with operation of organization. To solve this challenge we propose to use Activity Theory contradictions concept to help to choose and monitor useful measures, norms and viability values.

Activity Theory is a framework that helps describe human work in an organization. It focuses on the premise that to examine human work, one has to reflect on the individual actions and the dynamic aspects of cooperative works between people. We take advantage of overlap between the DEMO and Activity theory concepts to find relevant control elements from activities gathered from organization DEMO model. We will use the proposed solution via a case study of a service (e.g., True-Kare) that allows someone to provide a remote assistance to another person by using a mobile phone.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Engeström, Y., Brown, K., Christopher, L.C., Gregory, J.: Coordination, Cooperation, and Communication in the Courts: Expansive Transitions in Legal Work. ISeminal Papers from the Laboratory of Comparative Human Cognition, pp. 369–388. Cambridge University Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aveiro, D., Silva, A., Tribolet, J.: Modeling the Function Perspective in ODE: Improving Unknown Exception Handling and Change, pp. 1–16 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dietz, J.: Enterprise Ontology: Theory and Methodology. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Vygotskiǐ, L.S., Cole, M.: Mind in society: the development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Engeström, S.A.: Discursive manifestations of contradictions in organizational change efforts: A methodological framework. Journal of Organizational Change Management 24, 368–387 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antonio Goncalves .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goncalves, A., Zacarias, M., Sousa, P. (2014). How to Use Activity Theory Contradiction Concept to Support Organization Control. In: Rocha, Á., Correia, A., Tan, F., Stroetmann, K. (eds) New Perspectives in Information Systems and Technologies, Volume 2. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 276. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_40

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05948-8_40

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-05947-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-05948-8

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics