Skip to main content

Property Testing Bounds for Linear and Quadratic Functions via Parity Decision Trees

  • Conference paper
Book cover Computer Science - Theory and Applications (CSR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8476))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In this paper, we study linear and quadratic Boolean functions in the context of property testing. We do this by observing that the query complexity of testing properties of linear and quadratic functions can be characterized in terms of complexity in another model of computation called parity decision trees.

The observation allows us to characterize testable properties of linear functions in terms of the approximate l 1 norm of the Fourier spectrum of an associated function. It also allows us to reprove the Ω(k) lower bound for testing k-linearity due to Blais et al [8]. More interestingly, it rekindles the hope of closing the gap of Ω(k) vs O(klogk) for testing k-linearity by analyzing the randomized parity decision tree complexity of a fairly simple function called E k that evaluates to 1 if and only if the number of 1s in the input is exactly k. The approach of Blais et al. using communication complexity is unlikely to give anything better than Ω(k) as a lower bound.

In the case of quadratic functions, we prove an adaptive two-sided Ω(n 2) lower bound for testing affine isomorphism to the inner product function. We remark that this bound is tight and furnishes an example of a function for which the trivial algorithm for testing affine isomorphism is the best possible. As a corollary, we obtain an Ω(n 2) lower bound for testing the class of Bent functions.

We believe that our techniques might be of independent interest and may be useful in proving other testing bounds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alon, N., Fischer, E., Newman, I., Shapira, A.: A combinatorial characterization of the testable graph properties: It’s all about regularity. SIAM J. Comput. 39(1), 143–167 (2009)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Alon, N., Kaufman, T., Krivelevich, M., Litsyn, S.N., Ron, D.: Testing low-degree polynomials over GF(2). In: Arora, S., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P., Sahai, A. (eds.) APPROX 2003 + RANDOM 2003. LNCS, vol. 2764, pp. 188–199. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bhattacharyya, A., Fischer, E., Hatami, H., Hatami, P., Lovett, S.: Every locally characterized affine-invariant property is testable. In: Proceedings of the 45th Annual ACM Symposium on Symposium on Theory of Computing, STOC 2013, pp. 429–436. ACM Press, New York (2013), http://doi.acm.org/10.1145/2488608.2488662

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhattacharyya, A., Grigorescu, E., Shapira, A.: A unified framework for testing linear-invariant properties. In: Proceedings of the 51st Annual IEEE Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, pp. 478–487 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bhrushundi, A.: On testing bent functions. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 20, 89 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bhrushundi, A., Chakraborty, S., Kulkarni, R.: Property testing bounds for linear and quadratic functions via parity decision trees. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 20, 142 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Blais, E.: Testing juntas nearly optimally. In: Proc. ACM Symposium on the Theory of Computing, pp. 151–158. ACM, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Blais, E., Brody, J., Matulef, K.: Property testing via communication complexity. In: Proc. CCC (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Blais, E., Kane, D.: Tight bounds for testing k-linearity. In: Gupta, A., Jansen, K., Rolim, J., Servedio, R. (eds.) APPROX/RANDOM 2012. LNCS, vol. 7408, pp. 435–446. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Blais, E., Weinstein, A., Yoshida, Y.: Partially symmetric functions are efficiently isomorphism-testable. In: FOCS, pp. 551–560 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Blum, M., Luby, M., Rubinfeld, R.: Self-testing/correcting with applications to numerical problems. In: STOC, pp. 73–83 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Buhrman, H., García-Soriano, D., Matsliah, A., de Wolf, R.: The non-adaptive query complexity of testing k-parities. CoRR abs/1209.3849 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Chakrabarty, D., Seshadhri, C.: A o(n) monotonicity tester for boolean functions over the hypercube. CoRR abs/1302.4536 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Chakraborty, S., Fischer, E., García-Soriano, D., Matsliah, A.: Junto-symmetric functions, hypergraph isomorphism and crunching. In: IEEE Conference on Computational Complexity, pp. 148–158 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Chen, V., Sudan, M., Xie, N.: Property testing via set-theoretic operations. In: ICS, pp. 211–222 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Fischer, E.: The art of uninformed decisions: A primer to property testing. Science 75, 97–126 (2001)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Fischer, E., Kindler, G., Ron, D., Safra, S., Samorodnitsky, A.: Testing juntas. Journal of Computer and System Sciences 68(4), 753–787 (2004), Special Issue on FOCS 2002

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fischer, E., Lehman, E., Newman, I., Raskhodnikova, S., Rubinfeld, R., Samorodnitsky, A.: Monotonicity testing over general poset domains. In: STOC, pp. 474–483 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Goldreich, O.: On testing computability by small width obdds. In: Serna, M., Shaltiel, R., Jansen, K., Rolim, J. (eds.) APPROX 2010. LNCS, vol. 6302, pp. 574–587. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Grigorescu, E., Wimmer, K., Xie, N.: Tight lower bounds for testing linear isomorphism. In: Raghavendra, P., Raskhodnikova, S., Jansen, K., Rolim, J.D.P. (eds.) RANDOM 2013 and APPROX 2013. LNCS, vol. 8096, pp. 559–574. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Huang, W., Shi, Y., Zhang, S., Zhu, Y.: The communication complexity of the hamming distance problem. Inf. Process. Lett. 99(4), 149–153 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Kaufman, T., Sudan, M.: Algebraic property testing: the role of invariance. In: STOC, pp. 403–412 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lee, T., Shraibman, A.: Lower bounds in communication complexity. Foundations and Trends in Theoretical Computer Science 3(4), 263–398 (2009)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. MacWilliams, F.J., Sloane, N.J.A.: The Theory of Error-Correcting Codes (North-Holland Mathematical Library). North Holland Publishing Co. (June 1988), http://www.worldcat.org/isbn/0444851933

  25. Neumann, T.: Bent functions, Master’s thesis (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. O’Donnell, R.: Analysis of boolean functions (2012), http://www.analysisofbooleanfunctions.org

  27. Rothaus, O.: On bent functions. Journal of Combinatorial Theory, Series A 20(3), 300–305 (1976), http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0097316576900248

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  28. Rubinfeld, R., Shapira, A.: Sublinear time algorithms. Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity (ECCC) 11(013) (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sun, X., Wang, C.: Randomized communication complexity for linear algebra problems over finite fields. In: STACS, pp. 477–488 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wimmer, K., Yoshida, Y.: Testing linear-invariant function isomorphism. In: Fomin, F.V., Freivalds, R., Kwiatkowska, M., Peleg, D. (eds.) ICALP 2013, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7965, pp. 840–850. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang, Z., Shi, Y.: On the parity complexity measures of boolean functions. Theor. Comput. Sci. 411(26-28), 2612–2618 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bhrushundi, A., Chakraborty, S., Kulkarni, R. (2014). Property Testing Bounds for Linear and Quadratic Functions via Parity Decision Trees. In: Hirsch, E.A., Kuznetsov, S.O., Pin, JÉ., Vereshchagin, N.K. (eds) Computer Science - Theory and Applications. CSR 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8476. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06686-8_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-06686-8_8

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-06685-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-06686-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics