Skip to main content

Digital Government

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:

Abstract

Digital government refers to the use of information and communication technologies in governance. The topic is broad encompassing political, governance, and policymaking behavior, structures, processes, outputs, and outcomes at all levels of government from local to global. This chapter summarizes the rise of digital government beginning in the early 1990s through the present. It briefly describes major efforts to increase transparency, openness, citizen engagement and participation, and computational methods underlying “smart” governments. The chapter is divided into three major sections. First, important developments in citizen participation and engagement are examined. Second, convergence within government is described with a focus on coordination and collaboration across boundaries to create “virtual agencies.” Third, some of the key challenges facing the future of digital government are discussed. The chapter concludes with the observation that in spite of seemingly intractable challenges to privacy, security, and inequality, digital government continues to hold enormous potential to advance well-being for individuals and governments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Benchler Y (2006) The wealth of networks: how social production transforms markets and freedom. Yale University, New Haven, http://www.benkler.org/Benkler_Wealth_Of_Networks.pdf

  • Caudle D et al (2013) Interagency ecological site. In: Handbook for rangelands. directives.sc.egov.usda.gov/OpenNonWebContent.aspx?content=33943.wba. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  • Fountain J (2001a) Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain J (2001b) Toward a theory of federal bureaucracy in the 21st century. In: Kamarck E, Nye JS Jr (eds) Governance.com: democracy in the information age. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC, pp 117–140

    Google Scholar 

  • Fountain J (2013a) Implementing cross-agency collaboration: a guide for federal managers. IBM center for the business of government, Washington, DC. http://www.businessofgovernment.org/sites/default/files/Implementing%20Cross%20Agency%20Collaboration.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  • Fountain J (2013b) The GPRA Modernization Act of 2010: examining constraints to, and providing tools for, cross-agency collaboration. Final report. Administrative conference of the United States, Washington, DC. http://www.acus.gov/sites/default/files/documents/GPRMA%20Project_Final%20Report_Fountain_12_3_13_0.pdf. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  • Fountain JE (2015) Connecting technologies to citizenship. In: Pagano M (ed) Technology and the resilience of metropolitan regions. University of Illinois, Champaign

    Google Scholar 

  • Gigler BS, Bailur S (eds) (2014) Closing the feedback loop: can technology bridge the accountability gap? World Bank, Washington, DC. http://hdl.handle.net/10986/18408. Accessed 29 Nov 2014

  • Harper L (2013) 10 tools to help open source cities maintain transparency. Opensource.com.opensource.com/government/13/10/tools-open-source-cities. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  • Hindman M (2008) The myth of digital democracy. Princeton University, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard P (2010) The digital origins of dictatorship and democracy: information technology and political Islam. Oxford University, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lazer D et al (2009) Computational social science. Science 323(5915):721–723

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mergel I (2012) Social media in the public sector: a guide to participation, collaboration and transparency in the networked world. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  • Morozov E (2011) The net delusion: the dark side of internet freedom. PublicAffairs/Perseus, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger K et al (2008) Digital citizenship: the internet, society and participation. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Mossberger K et al (2012) Digital cities: the internet and the geography of opportunity. Oxford University, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck B (2009) Wiki government: how technology can make government better, democracy stronger, and citizens more powerful. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Harrow R (2005) No place to hide. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Government Partnership (2014) Open government partnership homepage. http://www.opengovpartnership.org/. Accessed 28 Sept 2014

  • Sunstein C (2009) Republic.com 2.0. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber M (1978) Bureaucracy. In: Roth G, Wittich C (eds) Economy and society, vol 2. University of California, Berkeley, pp 956–1005 (Originally published in 1922)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jane E. Fountain .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Fountain, J.E. (2016). Digital Government. In: Bainbridge, W., Roco, M. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_51

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics