Skip to main content

Informal Science Education of Converging Technologies

  • Reference work entry
  • First Online:
  • 2519 Accesses

Abstract

The term “informal science education” is used to identify a wide variety of ways in which people learn about science outside of the formal educational process. While museums may have a tradition of preservation of objects for academic study, science and technology centers, which grew up everywhere in the second half of the twentieth century, focus on engaging the public in science. Driven initially by how phenomena could be put on display like objects in a museum, science museums developed a more explicit role in informal education, which has continued to evolve over time. Today’s theoretic underpinnings of informal education in science museums are a convergence of the practices of the field with educational research and social science research. Educational research has identified the types of learning that are supported by informal educational experiences, and different theories of knowledge and learning have suggested different approaches in developing museums. With the emergence of educational challenges for science museums on topics of current scientific research and technological development that raise questions about the societal and ethical implications of the choices we make, research in the social and political sciences has converged with educational research and the practices of the field. This convergence enables informal education in science museums to grapple not only with core principles of science but also with the presence of science in society and with public policy issues related to science and technology. Emerging engagement in the science of science communication holds promise for further expanding and refining informal education approaches for building bridges between the world of science and technology and the many publics whose lives are influenced by it.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   699.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD   949.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS) (1990) Project 2061: science for all Americans. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Barben D, Fisher R, Selin C, Guston D (2008) Anticipatory governance of nanotechnology: foresight, engagement, and integration. In: Hackett E, Amsterdamska O, Lynch M, Wajcman J (eds) The handbook of science and technology studies. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 979–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Blanc S, Abu El-Haj T, Christman JB (1998) The science learning network: an experiment in technology, Museum-school partnerships and educational reform. Research for action, Philadelphia. http://www.researchforaction.org/wp-content/uploads/publication-photos/17/Blanc_S_SLN_An_Experiment_in_Technology_Museum_School_Partnerships_and_Educational_Reform.pdf. Accessed 27 Oct 2014

  • Center for the Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE) Evidence Wiki. http://informalscience.org/research/wiki. Accessed 27 Oct 2014

  • Fischoff B, Scheufele DA (2013) The science of science communication. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science 110(Suppl 3):14031–14032. doi:10.1073/pnas.1312080110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guston DH (2008) Preface. In: Fisher E, Selin C, Wetmore JM (eds) The yearbook of nanotechnology in society: presenting futures, vol 1. Springer, New York, pp v–viii

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein GE (1998) Learning in the museum. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hein GE (2012) Progressive museum practice: John Dewey and democracy. Left Coast Press, Walnut Creek

    Google Scholar 

  • Iacovelli S, Beyer M, Kollmann EK (2012) Dimensions of public engagement with science summative evaluation. Museum of Science, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmann EK (2012) Clusters of informal science education projects: from public understanding of science to public engagement with science. In: van Lente H, Coenen C, Fleischer T, Konrad K, Krabbenborg L, Milburn C, Thoreau F, Zulsdorf TB (eds) Little by little: expansions of nanoscience and emerging technologies. Ios Press, Amsterdam, pp 65–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Leshner A (2003) Public engagement with science. Science 299(5609):977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matterson C, Holman J (2012) Informal science learning review: reflections from the wellcome trust. http://www.wellcome.ac.uk/About-us/Publications/Reports/Education/WTP040865.htm. Accessed 11 Oct 2014

  • McCallie EL, Bell L, Lohwater T, Falk JH, Lehr JL, Lewenstein B et al (2009) Many experts, many audiences: public engagement with science and informal science education. A CAISE Inquiry Group report, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller C, Guston D, Barben D, Wetmore J, Selin C, Fisher E (2007) CNS-ASU report # R07-0001. http://cns.asu.edu/sites/default/files/library_files/lib_millercagustondb_0.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2014

  • Mintz A, Borun M, Chambers M, Issues Laboratory Collaborative (1995) Communicating controversy: science museums and issues education. Association of Science-Technology Centers, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Munley ME (1986) Catalysts for change: the Kellogg projects in museum education. The Kellogg Projects in Museum Education, Washington, DC, p 31

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanoscale Informal Science Education Network (NISE Net) (2012) Nano & society big ideas, in Nano and Society Training Materials. http://www.nisenet.org/catalog/tools_guides/nano_society_training_materials. Accessed 12 Oct 2014

  • National Research Council (NRC) (2009) Learning science in informal environments: people, places, and pursuits. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Pearson G, Young AT (2002) Technically speaking: why all Americans need to know more about technology. National Academy Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Robelen EW (2011) National science foundation deemed leader in informal learning. Education Week 30(27):s14–15

    Google Scholar 

  • SRI International (2013) Intel computer clubhouse network annual survey report. http://www.computerclubhouse.org/sites/default/files/ICCN%20SRI_Alumni_Survey_Report%20March2013.pdf. Accessed 11 Oct 2014

  • Stevens S, Sutherland L, Krajcik J (2009) The big ideas of nanoscale science and engineering: a guidebook for secondary teachers. National Science Teachers Association, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetmore J, Bennett I, Jackson A, Herring B (2013) Nanotechnology and Society: a practical guide to engaging museum visitors in conversations. Center for Nanotechnology in Society. http://nisenet.org/sites/default/files/catalog/uploads/12249/nanotechnology_and_society_guide_14nov13.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2014

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Larry Bell .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this entry

Cite this entry

Bell, L. (2016). Informal Science Education of Converging Technologies. In: Bainbridge, W., Roco, M. (eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Convergence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07052-0_68

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics