Skip to main content

Investigating the Influence of Social Exclusion on Persuasion by a Virtual Agent

  • Conference paper
Persuasive Technology (PERSUASIVE 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8462))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Persuasive agents may function as a tool to induce changes in human behavior. Research has shown that human-likeness of such agents influences their effectiveness. Besides characteristics of the agent, other characteristics may also have strong influences on persuasive agents’ effectiveness. One such characteristic is social exclusion. When people feel socially excluded, they are more sensitive to social influence. In two studies, we investigated this effect in a human-agent interaction. Results show stronger behavior changes for socially exclusion compared to social inclusion. This effect seems stronger for females than for males.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ham, J., Midden, C.: A persuasive robotic agent to save energy: The influence of social feedback, feedback valence and task similarity on energy conservation behavior. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6414, pp. 335–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3), 143–166 (2003)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Qiu, L., Benbasat, I.: Evaluating anthropomorphic product recommendation agents: a social relationship perspective to designing information systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 25(4), 145–182 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi, Y.K., Miracle, G.E., Biocca, F.: The effects of anthropomorphic agents on advertising effectiveness and the mediating role of presence. Journal of Interactive Advertising 2(1) (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Epley, N., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review 114(4), 864 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Epley, N., Akalis, S., Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J.T.: Creating Social Connection Through Inferential Reproduction Loneliness and Perceived Agency in Gadgets, Gods, and Greyhounds. Psychological Science 19(2), 114–120 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Waytz, A., Cacioppo, J., Epley, N.: Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspectives on Psychological Science 5(3), 219–232 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Eyssel, F., Reich, N.: Loneliness makes the heart grow fonder (of robots)? On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of 8th ACM/IEEE Conference on Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 121–122. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jung, Y., Lee, K.M.: Effects of physical embodiment on social presence of social robots. In: Proceedings of PRESENCE, pp. 80–87 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Williams, K.D., Jarvis, B.: Cyberball: A program for use in research on interpersonal ostracism and acceptance. Behavior Research Methods 38(1), 174–180 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Van Beest, I., Williams, K.D.: When inclusion costs and ostracism pays, ostracism still hurts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 91(5), 918 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bernstein, M.J., Claypool, H.M.: Social exclusion and pain sensitivity why exclusion sometimes hurts and sometimes numbs. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 38(2), 185–196 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zadro, L., Williams, K.D., Richardson, R.: How low can you go? Ostracism by a computer is sufficient to lower self-reported levels of belonging, control, self-esteem, and meaningful existence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 40(4), 560–567 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Midden, C., Ham, J.: The persuasive effects of positive and negative social feedback from an embodied agent on energy conservation behavior. In: Proceedings of the AISB 2008 Symposium on Persuasive Technology, pp. 9–13. AISB (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Bartneck, C., Croft, E., Kulic, D.: Measuring the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence and perceived safety of robots. In: Metrics for HRI Workshop, Technical Report, pp. 37–44. IEEE (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Powers, A., Kiesler, S.: The advisor robot: tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM SIGCHI/SIGART Conference on Human-Robot Interaction, pp. 218–225. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Baumeister, R.F., Leary, M.R.: The need to belong: desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin 117(3), 497 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Guadagno, R.E., Blascovich, J., Bailenson, J.N., Mccall, C.: Virtual humans and persuasion: The effects of agency and behavioral realism. Media Psychology 10(1), 1–22 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Eagly, A.H., Carli, L.L.: Sex of researchers and sex-typed communications as determinants of sex differences in influenceability: a meta-analysis of social influence studies. Psychological Bulletin 90(1), 1–20 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Eagly, A.H.: Sex differences in influenceability. Psychological Bulletin 85(1), 86 (1978)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ruijten, P.A.M., Bouten, D.H.L., Rouschop, D.C.J., Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H.: The Development of a Rasch-Type Anthropomorphism Scale (2013) (under review)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wood, W.: Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology 51(1), 539–570 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Midden, C.J.H., Ham, J.: Persuasive Technology to promote pro-environmental behaviour. In: Steg, L., van den Berg, A.E., de Groot, J.I.M. (eds.) Environmental Psychology an Introduction, pp. 243–254. BPS Blackwell, West-Sussex (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ruijten, P.A.M., Ham, J., Midden, C.J.H. (2014). Investigating the Influence of Social Exclusion on Persuasion by a Virtual Agent. In: Spagnolli, A., Chittaro, L., Gamberini, L. (eds) Persuasive Technology. PERSUASIVE 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8462. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07126-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07127-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics