Skip to main content

Survey Sidekick: Structuring Scientifically Sound Surveys

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8474))

Abstract

Online surveys are becoming more popular as a means of information gathering in both academia and industry because of their relatively low cost and delivery. However, there are increasing debates on data quality in online surveys. We present a novel survey prototyping tool that integrates embedded learning resources to facilitate the survey prototyping process and encourage creating scientifically sound surveys. Results from a controlled pilot study confirmed that survey structure follows three guided principles: simple-first, structure-coherent and gradual-difficulty-increase, revealing positive effects on survey structures under learning resources influences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Evans, J.R., Mathur, A.: The value of online surveys. Internet Research 15(2), 195–219 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Aleven, V., Koedinger, K., Cross, K.: Tutoring answer explanation fosters learning with understanding. In: Lajoie, S., Vivet, M. (eds.) Artificial Intelligence in Education, pp. 199–206 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  3. He, Y., Hui, S.H., Quan, T.T.: Automatic summary assessment for intelligent tutoring systems. Computers & Education 53(3), 890–899 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K.D., Lynch, C., Aleven, V.: Evaluating an Intelligent Tutoring System for Making Legal Arguments with Hypotheticals. To appear in International Journal of AI in Education; Special Issue on Ill-Defined Domains 19(4) (2009), Aleven, V., Lynch, C. Pinkwart, N., Ashley, K. (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hsiao, I., Malhotra, M., Joo, J., Chae, H.S., Natriello, G.: Survey Sidekick: Learning & designing scientifically sound surveys. In: Paper for “Human-Computer Interaction and the Learning Sciences” Workshop, CSCL 2013, Madison, WI (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sudol, L.A., Rivers, K., Harris, T.K.: Calculating Probabilistic Distance to Solution in a Complex Problem Solving Domain. In: EDM, pp. 144–147 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Iarossi, G.: The Power of Survey Design: A User’s Guide for Managing Surveys, Interpreting Results, and Influencing Respondents. The World Bank, Washington, D.C (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  8. Barnes, T., Stamper, J.: Automatic hint generation for logic proof tutoring using historical data. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, Special issue on Intelligent Tutoring Systems 13(1), 3–12 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Le, N.-T., Menzel, W.: Using Constraint-Based Modelling to Describe the Solution Space of Ill-defined Problems in Logic Programming. In: Advances in Web Based Learning (ICSL 2007), pp. 367–379 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mitrovic, A.: An Intelligent SQL Tutor on the Web. International Journal of Articial Intelligence in Education 13(2-4), 173–197 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kittur, A., Chi, E.H., Suh, B.: Crowdsourcing user studies with Mechanical Turk. In: Proc. of CHI 2008 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Snow, R., O’Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A.Y.: Cheap and fast—but is it good?: evaluating non-expert annotations for natural language tasks. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, Honolulu, Hawaii, October 25-27 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hsiao, I., Brusilvsky, P.: The Role of Community Feedback in the Student Example Authoring Process: An Evaluation of AnnotEx. British Journal of Educational Technology 42(3), 482–499 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Factors influencing the response rate in social question and answering behavior. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW 2013), pp. 1263–1274. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., Konstan, J.A.: Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI 2008), pp. 865–874. ACM, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Graesser, A.C., Cai, Z., Louwerse, M.M., Daniel, F.: Question Understanding Aid (QUAID) A Web Facility that Tests Question Comprehensibility. Public Opinion Quarterly 70(1), 3–22 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Dillman, D.A.: Mail and internet surveys: The tailored design method, vol. 2. Wiley, New York (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Yue, Z., Han, S., He, D.: Modeling search processes using hidden states in collaborative exploratory web search. In: Proceedings of the 17th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, pp. 820–830 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Hsiao, IH., Han, S., Malhotra, M., Chae, H.S., Natriello, G. (2014). Survey Sidekick: Structuring Scientifically Sound Surveys. In: Trausan-Matu, S., Boyer, K.E., Crosby, M., Panourgia, K. (eds) Intelligent Tutoring Systems. ITS 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8474. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_65

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07221-0_65

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07220-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07221-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics