Skip to main content

Trends in Mammogram Image Quality, Dose and Screen-Detected Cancer Rates in an Organized Screening Mammography Program

  • Conference paper
  • 1991 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8539))

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia (SMPBC), Canada is a population based program that regularly performs quality assurance testing and outcomes analysis.

METHODS: A study was conducted to analyze the trends in the SMPBC quality assurance data from 1994 onwards to investigate any correlation between improvements in image quality (IQ), changes in radiation dose delivered per screen and detection of breast cancers.

RESULTS: Both IQ and cancer detection rates of invasive tumours ≤5 mm increased over 1994-2011 which came at the cost of a 127% increase in radiation dose delivered to the breast between 1994-2005 (IQ increased 21%, tumours ≤5 mm increased 107%). In subsequent years, as digital units started to replace film units the programs’ average IQ and CDRs remained unchanged, while the integration of digital units reduced the dose delivered at a populational level.

CONCLUSION: Improvements in IQ coincided with increased detection of small tumours.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Shapiro, S., Venet, W., Strax, P., Venet, L., Roeser, R.: Selection, Follow-Up, and Analysis in the Health Insurance Plan Study: A Randomized Trial with Breast Cancer Screening. Natl. Cancer Inst. Monogr. 67, 65–74 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tabar, L., Gad, A., Holmberg, L., Ljungquist, U., Fagerberg, C., Baldetorp, L., Gröntoft, O., Lundström, B.: Reduction in Mortality from Breast Cancer After Mass Screening with Mammography: Randomised Trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. The Lancet 325, 829–832 (1985)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cronin, K.A., Feuer, E.J., Clarke, L.D., Plevritis, S.K.: Impact of Adjuvant Therapy and Mam mography on US Mortality from 1975 to 2000: Comparison of Mortality Results from the CISNET Breast Cancer Base Case Analysis. JNCI Monographs, 112–121 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Boyd, N.F., Byng, J.W., Jong, R.A., Fishell, E.K., Little, L.E., Miller, A.B., Lockwood, G.A., Tritchler, D.L.: Quantitative Classification of Mammographic Densities and Breast Cancer Risk: Results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 87, 670–675 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kopans, D.B., Feig, S.A.: The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: A Critical Review. Am. J. Roentgenol. 161, 755–760 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Caro, J.J., O’Brien, J.A., Hartz, S.C.: Canadian National Breast Screening Study. CMAJ. 148(6), 876–877; author reply 880–883 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Basinski, A.S.: The Canadian National Breast Screening Study: Opportunity for a Rethink. CMAJ. 147, 1431–1434 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rajapakshe, R.: Prospective Analysis of Quality Control Data from the Screening Mammography Program of British Columbia (SMPBC), 500 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Trends in Mammography Dose and Image Quality 1974-2005, http://www.fda.gov/RadiationEmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113352.htm

  10. Henderson, T.O., Amsterdam, A., Bhatia, S., Hudson, M.M., Meadows, A.T., Neglia, J.P., Diller, L.R., Constine, L.S.: Systematic Review: Surveillance for Breast Cancer in Women Treated with Chest Radiation for Childhood, Adolescent, Or Young Adult Cancer. Ann. Intern. Med. 152, 444,455, W144–W154 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Conway, B.J., Suleiman, O.H., Rueter, F.G., Antonsen, R.G., Slayton, R.J.: National Survey of Mammographic Facilities in 1985, 1988, and 1992. Radiology 191, 323–330 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mammography Quality Standards Act Regulations, http://www.fda.gov/radiationemittingproducts/mammographyqualitystandardsactandprogram/regulations/ucm110906.htm

  13. Radiation Protection and Quality Standards in Mammography - Safety Procedures for the Installation, use and Control of Mammographic X-Ray Equipment: Safety Code 36, http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/radiation/safety-code_36-securite/index-eng.php#app3

  14. Mojarad, S., Venturini, B., Fulgenzi, P., Papaleo, R., Brisigotti, M., Monti, F., Canuti, D., Ravaioli, A.: Prediction of Nodal Metastasis and Prognosis of Breast Cancer by ANN-Based Assessment of Tumour Size and p53, Ki-67 and Steroid Receptor Expression. Anti Cancer Res. 33, 3925–3933 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Soerjomataram, I., Louwman, M.W., Ribot, J.G., Roukema, J.A., Coebergh, J.W.: An Over view of Prognostic Factors for Long-Term Survivors of Breast Cancer. Breast Cancer Res. Treat. 107, 309–330 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Parker, B. et al. (2014). Trends in Mammogram Image Quality, Dose and Screen-Detected Cancer Rates in an Organized Screening Mammography Program. In: Fujita, H., Hara, T., Muramatsu, C. (eds) Breast Imaging. IWDM 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8539. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_58

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07887-8_58

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-07886-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-07887-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics