Skip to main content

Participation and Open Innovation for Sustainable Software Engineering

  • Chapter
  • 1946 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the reasons why the innovation processes, in particular in software engineering, become more and more open and participative; and the implications on the sustainability of future software-intensive systems. The chapter then goes deeper in understanding participation, and the collaborative creativity processes that lie behind it, towards an understanding of the conditions under which participation may lead to more sustainability. The case of open source software is analysed as an illustration and finally suggests novel participative and requirements-oriented techniques to support the design of sustainable systems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Abernathy WJ, Utterback JM (1978) Patterns of industrial innovation. Technol Rev 64:254–282

    Google Scholar 

  2. Aitamurto T (2011) The impact of crowdfunding on journalism. Journalism Pract 5(4):429–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Plann 35(4):216–224

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Arthur WB (1989) Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock-in by historical events. Econ J 99:116–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Asare P et al (2012) The medical device dongle: an open-source standards-based platform for interoperable medical device connectivity. In: 2nd ACM SIGHIT international health informatics symposium. ACM, New York, pp 667–672

    Google Scholar 

  6. Björkdahl J (2009) Technology cross-fertilization and the business model: the case of integrating ICTs in mechanical engineering products. Res Policy 38(9):1468–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Camara G, Fonseca F (2007) Information policies and open source software in developing countries. J Am Soc Inform Sci Technol 58(1):121–132

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Castiaux A (2012) Developing dynamic capabilities to meet sustainable development challenges. Int J Innovat Manag 16(6):16

    Google Scholar 

  9. Castiaux A, Paque S (2009) Participative innovation: when innovation becomes everyone’s business. Int J Enterpren Innovat Manag 10(2):111–121

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chesbrough HW (2003) Open innovation: the new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business Press, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doelle M, Sinclair AJ (2006) Time for a new approach to public participation in EA: promoting cooperation and consensus for sustainability. Environ Impact Assess Rev 26(2):185–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Ebert C (2007) Open source drives innovation. IEEE Software 24(3):105–109

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Freeman RE et al (2004) Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited”. Organ Sci 15(3):364–369

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Freeman RE (2010) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Frees B et al (2010) Generating Braille from OpenOffice.org. In: Miesenberger K et al (eds) Computers helping people with special needs. Springer, Berlin, pp 81–88

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Fung A (2006) Varieties of participation in complex governance. Publ Admin Rev 66:66–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gladwell M (2011) Creation myth. http://www.newyorker.com/reporting/2011/05/16/110516fa_fact_gladwell?currentPage=all

  18. Goode L (2009) Social news, citizen journalism and democracy. New Media Soc 11(8):1287–1305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hall J (2000) Environmental supply chain dynamics. J Cleaner Prod 8(6):455–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hanson VL et al (2005) Improving Web accessibility through an enhanced open-source browser. IBM Syst J 44(3):573–588

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Hardin G (1968) The tragedy of the commons. Science 162(3859):1243–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Hertel G et al (2003) Motivation of software developers in Open Source projects: an Internet-based survey of contributors to the Linux kernel. Res Policy 32(7):1159–1177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Von Hippel E (2005) Democratizing innovation. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  24. Pavlik PI Jr et al (2012) Facilitating co-adaptation of technology and education through the creation of an open-source repository of interoperable code. In: Cerri SA et al (eds) Intelligent tutoring systems. Springer, Berlin, pp 677–678

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kilamo T et al (2012) Open source, open innovation and intellectual property rights – a lightning talk. In: Hammouda I et al (eds) Open source systems: long-term sustainability. Springer, Berlin, pp 298–303

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  26. Ley M, Bast H. The DBLP computer science bibliography. http://www.dblp.org

  27. Li JP et al (2013) A case study of private–public collaboration for humanitarian free and open source disaster management software deployment. Decis Support Syst 55(1):1–11

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lyons M et al (2001) Participation, empowerment and sustainability: (how) do the links work? Urban Stud 38(8):1233–1251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Mahaux M et al (2013) Collaborative creativity in requirements engineering: analysis and practical advice. In: Proceedings of the 7th international IEEE conference on research challenges in information science, Paris, France

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mahaux M et al (2011) Discovering sustainability requirements: an experience report. In: Requirements engineering: foundation for software quality, pp 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  31. Mahaux M et al (2010) Making it all up: getting on the act to improvise creative requirements. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE conference on requirements engineering. IEEE, Sydney

    Google Scholar 

  32. Mahaux M, Hoffman A (2012) Research preview: using improvisational theatre to invent and represent scenarios for designing innovative systems. In: 1st International workshop on creativity in requirements engineering, Essen, Germany

    Google Scholar 

  33. Mahaux M, Maiden N (2008) Theater improvisers know the requirements game. IEEE Software 25(5):68–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Merten T et al (2011) Improved representation of traceability links in requirements engineering knowledge using Sunburst and Netmap visualizations. In: 2011 Fourth international workshop on managing requirements knowledge (MARK), pp 17–21

    Google Scholar 

  35. Mormont M et al (2006) La participation composante du développement durable: quatre études de cas. VertigO Rev Électronique En Sci Environ 7:2

    Google Scholar 

  36. Nalebuff BJ, Brandenburger A (1996) Co-opetition. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  37. Noll J (2007) Innovation in open source software development: a tale of two features. In: Feller J et al (eds) Open source development, adoption and innovation. Springer, New York, pp 109–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  38. Nyman L et al (2012) Perspectives on code forking and sustainability in open source software. In: Hammouda I et al (eds) Open source systems: long-term sustainability. Springer, Berlin, pp 274–279

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  39. Penzenstadler B et al (eds) (2013) Proceedings of the 2nd International workshop on requirements engineering for sustainable systems. Presented at the RE4SuSy@RE, Rio, Brazil

    Google Scholar 

  40. Penzenstadler B et al (2013) University meets industry: calling in real stakeholders. In: 2013 I.E. 26th conference on software engineering education and training (CSEE T), pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  41. Penzenstadler B, Femmer H, Richardson D (2013) Who is the advocate? Stakeholders for sustainability. In: 2nd International workshop on Green and Sustainable Software (GREENS) 2013. IEEE, pp 70–77

    Google Scholar 

  42. Pollock R (2009) Innovation, imitation and open source. Int J Open Source Software Process 1(2):28–42

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  43. Rayna T, Striukova L (2010) Large-scale open innovation: open source vs. patent pools. Int J Technol Manag 52(3):477–496

    Google Scholar 

  44. Reuchamps M (1978) Le G1000. http://orbi.ulg.ac.be/handle/2268/142718

  45. Schumpeter JA (1975) Capitalism, socialism, and democracy. Harper Colophon, New York

    Google Scholar 

  46. Sonntag V (2000) Sustainability – in light of competitiveness. Ecol Econ 34(1):101–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Stephens A et al (2012) The challenges of developing an open source, standards-based technology stack to deliver the latest UK climate projections. Int J Digit Earth 5(1):43–62

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  48. Strobbe C et al (2010) Generating DAISY books from OpenOffice.org. In: Miesenberger K et al (eds) Computers helping people with special needs. Springer, Berlin, pp 5–11

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  49. Teece DJ (2007) Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strat Manag J 28(13):1319–1350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Tritter JQ, McCallum A (2006) The snakes and ladders of user involvement: moving beyond Arnstein. Health Policy 76(2):156–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Waldman M (1993) A new perspective on planned obsolescence. Q J Econ 108:273–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Wnuk K et al (2012) How can open source software development help requirements management gain the potential of open innovation: an exploratory study. In: Proceedings of the ACM-IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement. ACM, New York, pp 271–280

    Google Scholar 

  53. Etude sur l’innovation participative 2011. http://www.innovacteurs.asso.fr/?page_id=29

  54. G1000: Platform for democratic innovation. http://www.g1000.org/en/

  55. Overview – Redmine. http://www.redmine.org/

  56. The open source definition (annotated) | Open Source Initiative. http://opensource.org/osd-annotated

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martin Mahaux .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Mahaux, M., Castiaux, A. (2015). Participation and Open Innovation for Sustainable Software Engineering. In: Calero, C., Piattini, M. (eds) Green in Software Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08581-4_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08581-4_13

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08580-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08581-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics