Skip to main content

Abstract

This paper deals with the possibility roots of binomial parameter interval estimation. It shows that conventional probability methods consist to obtain confidence intervals representing de dicto parameter uncertainty from coverage intervals representing de re uncertainty of observed samples. We relate the different types of coverage intervals to equivalent de re possibility distributions whose lead after inversion to de dicto possibility distributions corresponding to the stacking up of all confidence intervals at all levels. The different choices for the centre of the intervals corresponds to the different existing methods, in the same vein a novel one centred on the mean is proposed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Hald, A.: A History of Parametric Statistical Inference from Bernoulli to Fisher, pp. 1713–1935. Springer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets as a basis for a theory of possibility. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 1(1), 3–28 (1978)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Possibility Theory. Plenum, New York (1988)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Dubois, D., Prade, H., Sandri, S.: On possibility/probability transformations. Fuzzy Logic, 103–112 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mauris, G., Lasserre, V., Foulloy, L.: A fuzzy approach for the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Int. Journal of Measurement 29(3), 165–177 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dubois, D., Foulloy, L., Mauris, G., Prade, H.: Probability-possibility transformations, triangular fuzzy sets and probabilistic inequalities. Reliable Computing 10(4), 273–297 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Boudot, M.: Probabilité et logique de l’argumentation selon Jacques Bernoulli. In Philosophie et Logique, Presses de l’Université Paris Sorbonne, 15–37 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Tassi P.: Méthodes Statistiques. Economica, 3rd edn., Paris (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Brown, L., Tony Cai, T., DasGupta, A.: Interval estimation for a binomial proportion. Statistical Science 16(2), 101–133 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: When upper probabilities are possibility measures. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 49, 65–74 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, H.Y.: Fiducial intervals what are they? The American Statistician 54(2), 105–111 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Mauris, G. (2014). A Possibilistic View of Binomial Parameter Estimation. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 442. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_41

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08795-5_41

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08794-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08795-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics