Skip to main content

Coping with Imprecision During a Semi-automatic Conceptual Indexing Process

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 444))

Abstract

Concept-based information retrieval is known to be a powerful and reliable process. It relies on a semantically annotated corpus, i.e. resources indexed by concepts organized within a domain ontology. The conception and enlargement of such index is a tedious task, which is often a bottleneck due to the lack of (semi-)automated solutions. In this paper, we first introduce a solution to assist experts during the indexing process thanks to semantic annotation propagation. The idea is to let them position the new resource on a semantic map, containing already indexed resources and to propose an indexation of this new resource based on those of its neighbors. To further help users, we then introduce indicators to estimate the robustness of the indexation with respect to the indicated position and to the annotation homogeneity of nearby resources. By computing these values before any interaction, it is possible to visually inform users on their margins of error, therefore reducing the risk of having a non-optimal, thus unsatisfying, annotation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Haav, H.M., Lubi, T.L.: A survey of concept-based information retrieval tools on the web. In: Proceedings of the 5th East-European Conference ADBIS, vol. 2, pp. 29–41 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Crampes, M., Ranwez, S., Velickovski, F., Mooney, C., Mille, N.: An integrated visual approach for music indexing and dynamic playlist composition. In: Electronic Imaging 2006, p. 607103. International Society for Optics and Photonics (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Crampes, M., de Oliveira-Kumar, J., Ranwez, S., Villerd, J.: Visualizing social photos on a hasse diagram for eliciting relations and indexing new photos. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 15(6), 985–992 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazaridis, M., Axenopoulos, A., Rafailidis, D., Daras, P.: Multimedia search and retrieval using multimodal annotation propagation and indexing techniques. Signal Processing: Image Communication 28(4), 351–367 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Marchiori, M.: The limits of web metadata, and beyond. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30(1), 1–9 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Abrouk, L., Gouaïch, A.: Automatic annotation using citation links and co-citation measure: Application to the water information system. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 44–57. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Jeon, J., Manmatha, R.: Using maximum entropy for automatic image annotation. In: Enser, P.G.B., Kompatsiaris, Y., O’Connor, N.E., Smeaton, A.F., Smeulders, A.W.M. (eds.) CIVR 2004. LNCS, vol. 3115, pp. 24–32. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang, H., Su, Z.: Improving cbir by semantic propagation and cross modality query expansion. In: Proc. of the Int. Workshop on Multimedia Content-based Indexing and Retrieval, Brescia, pp. 19–21 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Shevade, B., Sundaram, H.: Vidya: an experiential annotation system. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMM Workshop on Experiential Telepresence, pp. 91–98. ACM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lin, D.: An information-theoretic definition of similarity. In: ICML, vol. 98, pp. 296–304 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schlicker, A., Domingues, F.S., Rahnenführer, J., Lengauer, T.: A new measure for functional similarity of gene products based on gene ontology. BMC Bioinformatics 7(1), 302 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Harispe, S., Janaqi, S., Ranwez, S., Montmain, J.: From theoretical framework to generic semantic measures library. In: Demey, Y.T., Panetto, H. (eds.) OTM 2013 Workshops. LNCS, vol. 8186, pp. 739–742. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Harispe, S., Ranwez, S., Janaqi, S., Montmain, J.: The Semantic Measures Library and Toolkit: fast computation of semantic similarity and relatedness using biomedical ontologies (2013), doi:10.1093/bioinformatics

    Google Scholar 

  14. Seco, N., Veale, T., Hayes, J.: An intrinsic information content metric for semantic similarity in wordnet. In: ECAI, vol. 16, p. 1089. Citeseer (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Fiorini, N., Ranwez, S., Montmain, J., Ranwez, V. (2014). Coping with Imprecision During a Semi-automatic Conceptual Indexing Process. In: Laurent, A., Strauss, O., Bouchon-Meunier, B., Yager, R.R. (eds) Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems. IPMU 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 444. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08852-5_2

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08851-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08852-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics