Skip to main content

Predicate Abstraction of Rewrite Theories

  • Conference paper
Rewriting and Typed Lambda Calculi (RTA 2014, TLCA 2014)

Abstract

For an infinite-state concurrent system \(\mathcal{S}\) with a set AP of state predicates, its predicate abstraction defines a finite-state system whose states are subsets of AP, and its transitions s → s′ are witnessed by concrete transitions between states in \(\mathcal{S}\) satisfying the respective sets of predicates s and s′. Since it is not always possible to find such witnesses, an over-approximation adding extra transitions is often used. For systems \(\mathcal{S}\) described by formal specifications, predicate abstractions are typically built using various automated deduction techniques. This paper presents a new method—based on rewriting, semantic unification, and variant narrowing—to automatically generate a predicate abstraction when the formal specification of \(\mathcal{S}\) is given by a conditional rewrite theory. The method is illustrated with concrete examples showing that it naturally supports abstraction refinement and is quite accurate, i.e., it can produce abstractions not needing over-approximations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Abdulla, P.A., Chen, Y.-F., Delzanno, G., Haziza, F., Hong, C.-D., Rezine, A.: Constrained monotonic abstraction: A CEGAR for parameterized verification. In: Gastin, P., Laroussinie, F. (eds.) CONCUR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6269, pp. 86–101. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Avenhaus, J., Loría-Sáenz, C.: On conditional rewrite systems with extra variables and deterministic logic programs. In: Pfenning, F. (ed.) LPAR 1994. LNCS, vol. 822, pp. 215–229. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Snyder, W.: Unification theory. In: Handbook of Automated Reasoning, pp. 445–532. Elsevier and MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bae, K., Escobar, S., Meseguer, J.: Abstract logical model checking of infinite-state systems using narrowing. In: RTA. LIPIcs, vol. 21, pp. 81–96 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ball, T., Majumdar, R., Millstein, T., Rajamani, S.K.: Automatic predicate abstraction of C programs. ACM SIGPLAN Notices 36(5), 203–213 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarke, E., Grumberg, O., Jha, S., Lu, Y., Veith, H.: Counterexample-guided abstraction refinement. In: Emerson, E.A., Sistla, A.P. (eds.) CAV 2000. LNCS, vol. 1855, pp. 154–169. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Clarke, E.M., Grumberg, O., Peled, D.A.: Model Checking. The MIT Press (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clavel, M., Durán, F., Eker, S., Lincoln, P., Martí-Oliet, N., Meseguer, J., Talcott, C.: All About Maude - A High-Performance Logical Framework. LNCS, vol. 4350. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Comon-Lundh, H., Delaune, S.: The finite variant property: How to get rid of some algebraic properties. In: Giesl, J. (ed.) RTA 2005. LNCS, vol. 3467, pp. 294–307. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Das, S., Dill, D.L., Park, S.: Experience with predicate abstraction. In: Halbwachs, N., Peled, D.A. (eds.) CAV 1999. LNCS, vol. 1633, pp. 160–171. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dershowitz, N., Jouannaud, J.P.: Rewrite systems. In: Handbook of Theoretical Computer Science, vol. B, pp. 243–320. North-Holland (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Durán, F., Meseguer, J.: A Church-Rosser checker tool for conditional order-sorted equational Maude specifications. In: Ölveczky, P.C. (ed.) WRLA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6381, pp. 69–85. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Escobar, S., Meseguer, J.: Symbolic model checking of infinite-state systems using narrowing. In: Baader, F. (ed.) RTA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4533, pp. 153–168. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Escobar, S., Sasse, R., Meseguer, J.: Folding variant narrowing and optimal variant termination. J. Algebraic and Logic Programming 81, 898–928 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Genet, T., Rusu, V.: Equational approximations for tree automata completion. Journal of Symbolic Computation 45(5), 574–597 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Graf, S., Saïdi, H.: Construction of abstract state graphs with PVS. In: Grumberg, O. (ed.) CAV 1997. LNCS, vol. 1254, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Lahiri, S.K., Bryant, R.E., Cook, B.: A symbolic approach to predicate abstraction. In: Hunt Jr., W.A., Somenzi, F. (eds.) CAV 2003. LNCS, vol. 2725, pp. 141–153. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Meseguer, J.: Membership algebra as a logical framework for equational specification. In: Parisi-Presicce, F. (ed.) WADT 1997. LNCS, vol. 1376, pp. 18–61. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Meseguer, J.: Conditional rewriting logic as a unified model of concurrency. Theor. Comp. Sci. 96(1), 73–155 (1992)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Meseguer, J.: Twenty years of rewriting logic. J. Algebraic and Logic Programming 81, 721–781 (2012)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Meseguer, J., Palomino, M., Martí-Oliet, N.: Equational abstractions. Theor. Comp. Sci. 403(2-3), 239–264 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ohsaki, H., Seki, H., Takai, T.: Recognizing boolean closed A-tree languages with membership conditional rewriting mechanism. In: Nieuwenhuis, R. (ed.) RTA 2003. LNCS, vol. 2706, pp. 483–498. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Palomino, M.: A predicate abstraction tool for maude (2005), http://maude.sip.ucm.es/~miguelpt/bibliography.html

  24. Viry, P.: Equational rules for rewriting logic. Theor. Comp. Sci. 285 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Visser, W., Havelund, K., Brat, G., Park, S., Lerda, F.: Model checking programs. Automated Software Engineering 10(2), 203–232 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bae, K., Meseguer, J. (2014). Predicate Abstraction of Rewrite Theories. In: Dowek, G. (eds) Rewriting and Typed Lambda Calculi. RTA TLCA 2014 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8560. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08918-8_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-08918-8_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-08917-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-08918-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics