Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Assessing the Structural Fluidity of Virtual Organizations and Its Effects

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Socioinformatics - The Social Impact of Interactions between Humans and IT

Part of the book series: Springer Proceedings in Complexity ((SPCOM))

  • 644 Accesses

Abstract

A major advantage of Virtual Organizations (VOs) is flexible membership and participation. VO members are able to join and leave VOs at will, and can change whom they collaborate with at any point in time. Such flexibility may make VOs more efficient in the completion of collaborative work than traditional organizations. However, efficiency is only one of several measures of organizational performance; and flexibility in a virtual organization includes both how VO structures may be more fluid and adaptive, and how VO leadership emerges and evolves throughout the VO lifecycle. The aim of this chapter is to: (1) define and quantitatively assess the actual flexibility of participation in VOs, through a social network index that we call structural fluidity; and (2) measure the relationship between fluidity and performance in the work carried out within the VO. These are essential insights for the development of theories to guide the formation, development and dissolution of VOs, and teams that emerge around VO work. To accomplish these aims, we will apply a methodological approach and ontology for the study of VOs that we have used in over a dozen published studies, and refer to as Group Informatics. Our approach enables a comprehensive, interdisciplinary inquiry into the relationship between structural fluidity and performance in diverse VOs. Specifically, we will examine VOs in software engineering, disaster relief, online learning and public discourse communities that emerge through social media. We will apply Group Informatics to the design, development and testing of empirically and theoretically grounded algorithms for measuring VO fluidity and performance in each context, which will result in new theoretical advances that enable sophisticated analysis of the resulting data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Adar E, Ré C (2007) Managing uncertainty in social networks. IEEE Data Eng Bull 30(2):15–22

    Google Scholar 

  2. Arisholm E, Briand LC, Johannessen EB (2010) A systematic and comprehensive investigation of methods to build and evaluate fault prediction models. J Syst Softw 83(1):2–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Blincoe K, Valetto G, Goggins S (2012) Leveraging task contexts for managing developers’ coordination. In: Proceedings of the 2012 ACM CSCW conference, ACM, New York, pp 1351–1360

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown JS, Duguid P (1991) Organizational learning and communities-of-practice: toward a unified view of working, learning and innovation. Organ Sci 2(1):40–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown JS, Duguid P (2000) The social life of information. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryant SL, Forte A, Bruckman A (2005) Becoming Wikipedian: transformation of participation in a collaborative online encyclopedia. In: Proceedings of the 2005 international ACM SIGGROUP conference on supporting group work, ACM, New York, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bui T, Cho S, Sankaran S et al (2000) A framework for designing a global information network for multinational humanitarian assistance/disaster relief. Inf Syst Front 1(4):427–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Burt RS (2004) Structural holes and good ideas. Am J Sociol 110(2):349–399

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cataldo M, Wagstrom PA, Herbsleb JD et al (2006) Identification of coordination requirements: implications for the design of collaboration and awareness tools. In: Proceedings of the CSCW 2006, Alberta

    Google Scholar 

  10. Child J (1972) Organizational structure, environment and performance: the role of strategic choice. Sociology 6(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Chudoba KM, Wynn E, Lu M et al (2005) How virtual are we? Measuring virtuality and understanding its impact in a global organization. J Inf Syst 15:279–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Crandall D, Cosley D, Huttenlocher D et al (2008) Feedback effects between similarity and social influence in online communities. In: Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, ACM, New York, pp 160–168

    Google Scholar 

  13. Crowston K, Howison J (2005) The social structure of free and open source software development. First Monday, p 10

    Google Scholar 

  14. Crowston K, Wei K, Howison J et al (2012) Free/Libre open source software development: what we know and what we do not know. ACM Comput Surv 44(2):7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Crowston K, Wei K, Li Q et al (2006) Core and periphery in Free/Libre and Open Source software team communications. In: HICSS ’06. Proceedings of the 39th Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, vol 6, Waikoloa, p 118

    Google Scholar 

  16. Crowston K, Wiggins A, Howison J (2010) Analyzing leadership dynamics in distributed group communication. In: HICSS ’10. Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Hawaii international conference on system sciences, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dourish P (2004) What we talk about when we talk about context. Pers Ubiquit Comput 8:19–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. English R, Schweik CM (2007) Identifying success and tragedy of FLOSS commons: a preliminary classification of Sourceforge.net projects. In: FLOSS ’07. First international workshop on emerging trends in FLOSS research and development, Minneapolis

    Google Scholar 

  19. Fine GA, Harrington B (2004) Tiny publics: small groups and civil society. Sociol Theory 22(3):341–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fleming L, Waguespack DM (2007) Brokerage, boundary spanning, and leadership in open innovation communities. Organ Sci 18(2):165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Freeman LC (1979) Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc Networks 1(3):215–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Geiger RS, Ribes D (2011) Trace ethnography: following coordination through documentary practices. In: Proceedings of the 2011 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences, IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, pp 1–10. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2011.455

  23. Goggins SP, Gallagher M, Laffey J (2011) Completely online group formation and development: small groups as socio-technical systems. Inform Technol People 24(2):104–133. doi:10.1108/09593841111137322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Goggins SP, Laffey J, Amelung C (2011) Context aware CSCL: moving toward contextualized analysis. In: CSCL 2011, Hong Kong

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goggins SP, Laffey J, Amelung C et al (2010) Social intelligence in completely online groups. In: IEEE international conference on social computing, Minnesota, 20–22 August 2010, pp 500–507

    Google Scholar 

  26. Goggins SP, Mascaro C, Valetto G (2013) Group informatics: a methodological approach and ontology for socio-technical group research. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 64(3):516–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Goggins SP, Valetto G, Mascaro C et al (2013) Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups using electronic trace data. User Model User-Adap Inter 23(4):345–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Goggins S, Mascaro C, Mascaro S (2012) Relief after the 2010 Haiti Earthquake: participation and leadership in an Online Resource Coordination Network. In: Proceedings from ACM conference on computer supported cooperative work, Seattle, pp 57–66

    Google Scholar 

  29. Goggins S, Mascaro C, Valetto G (2012) Group informatics: a methodological approach and ontology for understanding socio-technical groups. J Assoc Inform Sci Technol 64(3):516–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goggins S, Valetto P, Mascaro C et al (2012) Creating a model of the dynamics of socio-technical groups. User Model User-Adap Interact J Pers Res 23(4):345–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Gong L, Teng CY, Eecs AL et al (2011) Coevolution of network structure and content. WebSci~’12. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM web science conference, Illinois, Evanston, 22–24 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

  32. Gross T, Stary C, Totter A (2005) User-centered awareness in computer supported cooperative work systems: structured embedding of findings from social sciences. Int J Hum Comput Interact 18(3):323–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Healy PGT, White G, Eshghi A et al (2007) Communication spaces. Comput Supported Coop Work 16

    Google Scholar 

  34. Howison J, Wiggins A, Crowston K (2012) Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. J Assoc Inform Syst 12(2):767–797

    Google Scholar 

  35. Howley I, Mayfield E, Rosé CP (2012) Linguistic analysis methods for studying small groups. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  36. Huffaker DA, Teng CY, Simmons MP et al (2011) Group membership and diffusion in virtual worlds. In: IEEE ’11, Massachusetts, Boston, 9–11 October 2011

    Google Scholar 

  37. Kiesler S, Boh WF, Ren Y et al (2005) Virtual Teams and the geographically dispersed professional organization. In: Extending the contributions of Professor Rob Kling to the analysis of computerization movements California, Irvine, 11–12 March 2005

    Google Scholar 

  38. King G (2011) Ensuring the data-rich future of the social sciences. Science 331(6018):719–721. doi:10.1126/science.1197872

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kittur A, Chi EH, Pendelton BA et al (2007) Power of the few vs. wisdom of the crowd: Wikipedia and the rise of the bourgeoisie. In: CHI ‘07: 25th annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems. California, San Jose, April 28-May 3 2007

    Google Scholar 

  40. Kobsa A (2001) Generic user modeling systems. User Model User-Adap Inter 11(1):49–63

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Lee CP (2007) Boundary negotiating artifacts: unbinding routine of boundary objects and embracing chaos in collaborative work. Comput Supported Coop Work 16:307–339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Livne A, Simmons MP, Adar E et al (2011) The party is over here: structure and content in the 2010 election. In: Fifth international AAAI conference on weblogs and social media, Barcelona

    Google Scholar 

  43. Mascaro C, Goggins S (2011) Brewing up citizen engagement: the coffee party on Facebook. In: Proceedings of the communities and technologies, ACM, Brisbane

    Google Scholar 

  44. Mcculloh I (2009) Detecting changes in a dynamic social network. ProQuest, Ann Arbor

    Google Scholar 

  45. Mockus A, Fielding RT, Herbsleb JD (2002) Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans Softw Eng Methodol 11(3):309–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Newman MEJ (2004) Analysis of weighted networks. Phys Rev E 70(5):056131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. O’Leary M, Orlikowski W, Yates J (2002) Distributed work over the centuries: trust and control in the Hudson’s Bay Company, 1670–1826. Distributed Work, 27–54

    Google Scholar 

  48. Olson G, Herbsleb J, Rueter H (1994) Characterizing the sequential structure of interactive behaviors through statistical and grammatical techniques. Hum Comput Interact 9(4):427–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Orlikowski W (2002) Knowing in practice: enacting a collective capability in distributed organizing. Organ Sci 13:249–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Palen L, Anderson K M, Mark G et al (2010) A vision for technology-mediated support for public participation & assistance in mass emergencies & disasters. In: Proceedings of the 2010 ACM-BCS visions of computer science conference, Edinburgh, 13–16 April 2010

    Google Scholar 

  51. Petrinja E, Sillitti A, Succi G (2010) Comparing OpenBRR, QSOS, and OMM assessment models. Open Source Software, New Horizons, pp 224–238

    Google Scholar 

  52. Powell A, Piccoli G, Ives B (2004) Virtual teams: a review of current literature and directions for future research. Data Base Adv Inform Syst 35(1):6–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Stahl G (2006) Group cognition: computer support for building collaborative knowledge. MIT Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  54. Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, ‘translations’ and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907–39. Soc Stud Sci 19(3):87–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Strijbos JW, De Laat M, Martens RL et al (2005) Functional versus spontaneous roles during CSCL. In: CSCL 2005, pp 647–657

    Google Scholar 

  56. Teng CY, Gong L, Livne A et al (2011) Coevolution of network structure and content. In: Proceedings of the 3rd annual ACM web science conference, ACM, New York, pp 288–297

    Google Scholar 

  57. Terveen L, McDonald DW (2005) Social matching: a framework and research agenda. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 12(3):401–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Twidale MB (2005) Over the shoulder learning: supporting brief informal learning. Comput Support Coop Work (CSCW) 14(6):505–547. doi:10.1007/s10606-005-9007-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Watson-Manheim MB, Chudoba KM, Crowston K (2002) Discontinuities and continuities: a new way to understand virtual work. Inform Technol People 15(3):191–209. doi:10.1108/09593840210444746

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Wenger E (1998) Communities of practice: learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Wiggins A, Crowston K (2010) Reclassifying success and tragedy in FLOSS projects. Open Source Software, New Horizons, pp 294–307

    Google Scholar 

  62. Wu J, Goh KY (2009) Evaluating longitudinal success of open source software projects: a social network perspective. system sciences. In: HICSS ’09: 42nd Hawaii international conference, Hawaii

    Google Scholar 

  63. Zanetti MS, Scholtes I, Tessone CJ et al (2013) Categorizing bugs with social networks: a case study on four open source software communities. In: Proceedings of the 35th international conference on software engineering, San Francisco, pp 1032–1041, 18–26 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  64. Zanetti MS, Scholtes I, Tessone CJ, Schweitzer F (2013) The rise and fall of a central contributor: dynamics of social organization and performance in the GENTOO community, In: Proceedings of the international workshop on cooperative and human aspects of software engineering, San Francisco, pp 49–56

    Google Scholar 

  65. Zhou M, Mockus A (2012) What make long term contributors: willingness and opportunity in OSS community. In: Proceedings of the 34th ICSE. Zurich, pp 518–528, 2–9 June 2012

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Missouri, Columbia, MO, USA

    Sean P. Goggins

  2. Fondazione Bruno Kessler, Trento, Italy

    Giuseppe Valetto

Authors
  1. Sean P. Goggins
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giuseppe Valetto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sean P. Goggins .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Katharina Zweig

  2. Faculty Social Sciences, TU Kaiserslautern, Kaiserslautern, Germany

    Wolfgang Neuser

  3. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Volkmar Pipek

  4. Institut für Wirtschaftsinformatik, Universität Siegen, Siegen, Germany

    Markus Rohde

  5. Chair of Systems Design, ETH Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland

    Ingo Scholtes

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Goggins, S.P., Valetto, G. (2014). Assessing the Structural Fluidity of Virtual Organizations and Its Effects. In: Zweig, K., Neuser, W., Pipek, V., Rohde, M., Scholtes, I. (eds) Socioinformatics - The Social Impact of Interactions between Humans and IT. Springer Proceedings in Complexity. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09378-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09378-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09377-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09378-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation