Abstract
In the course of several years, we employed blogging assignments in an obligatory web design course. The assignment was able to attract interest of few students only, while the majority did not participate, or only very sparsely. It did not help much to make the assignment part of the course evaluation. The course received mixed reviews from the students. The students who were not really interested in the subject, or considered it too much work, complained. In last two years we tried to address this problem by introduction of a tight blogging schedule, and peer-reviews. As we report in this paper, this step radically improved the participation rate, and also learning outcomes were higher, however the student’s opinion of these activities was not amended.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Andergassen, M., Behringer, R., Finlay, J., Gorra, A., Moore, D.: Weblogs in higher education-why do students (not) blog? Electronic Journal of e-Learning 7(3) (2009)
Churchill, D.: Educational applications of web 2.0: Using blogs to support teaching and learning. British Journal of Educational Technology 40(1) (2009)
Gehringer, E.F.: Strategies and mechanisms for electronic peer review. In: Proceedings Frontiers in Education (2000)
von Glasersfeld, E.: Radical Constructivism. A Way of Knowing and Learning. Falmer Press, London (1995)
Homola, M., Kubincová, Z.: Taking advantage of Web 2.0 in organized education (a survey). In: ICL, Villach, Austria (2009)
Ken, P.M., Park, K.H., Domazlicky, B.R.: Peer grading of essays in a principles of microeconomics course. Journal of Education for Business 70(6) (1995)
Lin, S.S.J., Liu, E.Z.F., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer assessment: feedback for students with various thinking-styles. J. Comput. Assist. Lear. 17(4) (2001)
Liu, E.Z.F., Lin, S.S.J., Chiu, C.H., Yuan, S.M.: Web-based peer review: the learner as both adapter and reviewer. IEEE Transactions on Education 44(3), 246–251 (2001)
MacAlpine, J.M.K.: Improving and encouraging peer assessment of student presentations. Assess. Eval. High. Educ. 24(1) (1999)
Mosel, S.: Self directed learning with personal publishing and microcontent. In: Microlearning 2005 Conference (2005)
Popescu, E.: Students’ acceptance of web 2.0 technologies in higher education: Findings from a survey in a romanian university. In: DEXA 2010 (2010)
Popescu, E., Manafu, L.: Repurposing a wiki for collaborative learning-pedagogical and technical view. In: ISTCC (2011)
Sterbini, A., Temperini, M.: Dealing with open-answer questions in a peer-assessment environment. In: Popescu, E., Li, Q., Klamma, R., Leung, H., Specht, M. (eds.) ICWL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7558, pp. 240–248. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Tekinarslan, E.: Blogs: A qualitative investigation into an instructor and undergraduate students’ experience. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 24(4) (2008)
Williams, J., Jacobs, J.: Exploring the use of blogs as learning spaces in higher education sector. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology 20(2) (2004)
Wu, W.S.: The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers. Journal of Education and Foreign Languages and Literature 3(2) (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Bejdová, V., Homola, M., Kubincová, Z. (2014). Blogging in Obligatory Course: A Bitter Victory. In: Popescu, E., Lau, R.W.H., Pata, K., Leung, H., Laanpere, M. (eds) Advances in Web-Based Learning – ICWL 2014. ICWL 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8613. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09635-3_1
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09634-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09635-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)