Skip to main content

Towards an Improved Stakeholder Management for Software Reference Architectures

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8627))

Abstract

A recent survey on software reference architectures (RA) indicates their widespread usage. Among the leading problems when designing and using RA, practitioners point to various aspects of stakeholder management (e.g., stakeholder identification, involvement). In this paper, we identify and analyze issues that lie at the basis of the problems reported in stakeholder management, with a goal to improve the state of the practice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Angelov, S., Grefen, P., Greefhorst, D.: A Framework for Analysis and Design of Software Reference Architectures. Inf. and Soft. Technology 54(4), 417–431 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Angelov, S., Trienekens, J.J.M., Grefen, P.: Towards a Method for the Evaluation of Reference Architectures: Experiences from a Case. In: Morrison, R., Balasubramaniam, D., Falkner, K. (eds.) ECSA 2008. LNCS, vol. 5292, pp. 225–240. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Angelov, S., Trienekens, J., Kusters, R.: Software Reference Architectures - Exploring Their Usage and Design in Practice. In: Drira, K. (ed.) ECSA 2013. LNCS, vol. 7957, pp. 17–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Freeman, R.E.: Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Pitman, Boston (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Mitchell, R., Agle, B., Wood, D.: Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience: Defining the Principle of Who and What Really Counts. Academy of Management Review 22(4), 853–886 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Project Management Institute, A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge (PMBOK Guide), 4th ed. Project Management Institute Inc., Pennsylvania (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Preble, J.: Toward a Comprehensive Model of Stakeholder Management. Business and Society Review 10(4), 407–431 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Parent, M., Deephouse, D.: A Case Study of Stakeholder Identification and Prioritization by Managers. Journal of Business Ethics 75, 1–23 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cappelen, A.: Two Approaches to Stakeholder Identification. Ethics and Economics 2(2), 1–9 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Vos, J., Achterkamp, M.: Stakeholder Identification in Innovation Projects - Going Beyond Classification. European J. of Innovation Management 9(2), 161–177 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clarkson, M.: A Stakeholder Framework for Analyzing and Evaluating Corporate Social Performance. Academy of Management Review 20, 65–91 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Hull, E., Jackson, K., Dick, J.: Requirements Engineering, 3rd edn. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sharp, H., Finkelstein, A., Galal, G.: Stakeholder Identification in the Requirements Engineering Process. In: Proceedings of the Tenth International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications. IEEE Computer Society (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Alexander, I., Robertson, S.: Understanding Project Sociology by Modeling Stakeholders. IEEE Software 21(1), 23–27 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. IEEE: Recommended Practice for Architectural Description of Software-Intensive Systems.Std 1471-2000. IEEE (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  16. ISO/IEC/IEEE: Systems and software engineering —Architecture description. 42010, ISO/IEC/IEEE (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rozanski, N., Woods, E.: Software Systems Architecture: Working With Stakeholders Using Viewpoints and Perspectives. Addison-Wesley Professional (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Cotterell, M., Hughes, B.: Software Project Management. Int. Thomson Publishing (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Newman, W., Lamming, M.: Interactive System Design. Addison-Wesley (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Clements, P., Kazman, R., Klein, M.: Evaluating Software Architectures: Methods and Case Studies. Addison-Wesley (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  21. McManus, J.: A Stakeholder Perspective within Software Engineering Projects. In: Proceedings of the 2004 IEEE International I Engineering Management Conference, vol. 2, pp. 880–884. IEEE (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Preiss, O., Wegmann, A.: Stakeholder Discovery and Classification Based on Systems Science Principles. In: Proceedings of the Second Asia-Pacific Conference on Quality Software, pp. 194–198. IEEE (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ballejos, L., Montagna, J.: Method for Stakeholder Identification in Interorganizational Environments. Requirements Eng. 13, 281–297 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galster, M., Avgeriou, P., Tofan, D.: Constraints for the Design of Variability-Intensive Service-Oriented Reference Architectures – An Industrial Case Study. Information and Software Technology 55(2), 428–441 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Martínez-Fernández, S., Ameller, D., Ayala, C., Franch, X., Terradellas, X.: Conducting Empirical Studies on Reference Architectures in IT Consulting Firms. UPC (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Cloutier, R., et al.: The Concept of Reference Architectures. Systems Engineering 13(1), 14–27 (2010)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Conger, S.: The New Software Engineering. International Thomson Publishing (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Muller, G.: A Reference Architecture Primer (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Angelov, S., Grefen, P., Greefhorst, D.: A Classification of Software Reference Architectures: Analyzing their Success and Effectiveness. In: Joint Working IEEE/IFIP Conference on Software Architecture, 2009 & European Conference on Software Architecture, WICSA/ECSA 2009, September 14-17, pp. 141–150. IEEE, Cambridge (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. CCSDS: CCSDS Recommended Practice - Reference Architecture for Space Data Systems. CCSDS, NASA (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  31. ESDS Reference Architecture Working Group: ESDS Reference Architecture for the Decadal Survey Era. NASA ESDS Reference Architecture v1.0, NASA (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Nakagawa, E., Oquendo, F., Becker, M.: RAModel: A Reference Model for Reference Architectures. In: SPLC 2011 Proceedings of the 15th International Software Product Line Conference, vol. 2(28). IEEE Computer Society (2012)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Angelov, S., Hilliard, R. (2014). Towards an Improved Stakeholder Management for Software Reference Architectures. In: Avgeriou, P., Zdun, U. (eds) Software Architecture. ECSA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8627. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-09970-5_9

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-09969-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-09970-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics