Skip to main content

Using Verb-Noun Patterns to Detect Process Inputs

  • Conference paper
Book cover Text, Speech and Dialogue (TSD 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8655))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1505 Accesses

Abstract

We present the preliminary results of an ongoing work aimed at using morpho-syntactic patterns to extract information from process descriptions in a semi-supervised manner. The experiments have been designed for generic information extraction tasks and evaluated on detecting ingredients from cooking recipes in French using a large gold standard corpus. The proposed method uses bi-lexical dependency oriented syntactic analysis of the text and extracts relevant morpho-syntactic patterns. Those patterns are then used as features for different machine learning methods to acquire the final ingredient list. Furthermore, this approach may easily be adapted to similar tasks since it relies on mining generic morpho-syntactic patterns from the documents automatically. The method itself is language independent, considering language specific parsers being used. The performance of our method on the DEFT 2013 data set is nevertheless satisfactory since it significantly outperforms the best system from the original challenge (0.75 vs 0.66 MAP).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Higgins, F.R.: The pseudo-cleft construction in English. PhD thesis. Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Cambridge (1973)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Heycock, C.: Specification, equation, and agreement in copular sentences. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics / La Revue Canadienne De Linguistique 57, 209–240 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Galton, A., Mizoguchi, R.: The water falls but the waterfall does not fall: New perspectives on objects, processes and events. Applied Ontology 4, 71–107 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Faure, D., Nédellec, C.: Knowledge acquisition of predicate argument structures from technical texts using machine learning: The system asium. In: Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) EKAW 1999. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1621, pp. 329–334. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Grouin, C., Zweigenbaum, P., Paroubek, P.: DEFT2013 se met à table: présentation du défi et résultats. In: Actes de DEFT 2013: 9e DÉfi Fouille de Textes, Les Sables d’Olonne, France, pp. 1–14 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dini, L., Bittar, A., Ruhlmann, M.: Approches hybrides pour l’analyse de recettes de cuisine DEFT, TALN-RECITAL 2013. In: Actes de DEFT 2013: 9e DÉfi Fouille de Textes, Les Sables d’Olonne, France, pp. 53–65 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pak, A., Paroubek, P.: Text representation using dependency tree subgraphs for sentiment analysis. In: Xu, J., Yu, G., Zhou, S., Unland, R. (eds.) DASFAA Workshops 2011. LNCS, vol. 6637, pp. 323–332. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Nouvel, D., Antoine, J.Y., Friburger, N.: Pattern mining for named entity recognition. LNCS/LNAI Series 8387 (post-proceedings LTC 2011) (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Candito, M., Nivre, J., Denis, P., Henestroza Anguiano, E.: Benchmarking of statistical dependency parsers for french. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters, COLING 2010, Beijing, China, pp. 108–116 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Petrov, S., Barrett, L., Thibaux, R., Klein, D.: Learning accurate, compact, and interpretable tree annotation. In: Proceedings of the 21st International Conference on Computational Linguistics and the 44th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, ACL-44, pp. 433–440. Association for Computational Linguistics, Stroudsburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Candito, M., Crabé, B., Pascal, D.: Statistical french dependency parsing: Treebank conversion and first results. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Language Resources and Evaluation (LREC 2010), pp. 1840–1847. European Language Resources Association (ELRA), Valletta (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Candito, M., Crabbé, B., Falco, M.: Dépendances syntaxiques de surface pour le français – Schéma d’annotation pour un corpus en dépendances obtenu par conversion du FrenchTreebank (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Tesnière, L.: Éléments de Syntaxe Structurale. Éditions Klinksieck, Paris (1959)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Asadullah, M., Nouvel, D., Paroubek, P. (2014). Using Verb-Noun Patterns to Detect Process Inputs. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds) Text, Speech and Dialogue. TSD 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8655. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10816-2_23

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10816-2_23

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10815-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10816-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics