Abstract
Real time logics such as Metric Temporal Logic, MTL and Timed Propositional Temporal Logic (TPTL) exhibit considerable diversity in expressiveness and decidability properties based on the permitted set of modalities, the nature of time interval constraints and restriction on models. We study the expressiveness and decidability properties of various unary fragments of MTL incorporating strict as well as non-strict modalities. We show that, from the point of view of expressive power, MTL[\(\Diamond_I\)] \(\subsetneq\) MTL \([\Diamond^s_I] \subsetneq\) MTL \([\Diamond_I,\bigcirc] \equiv\) MTL \([\Diamond^s_I,\bigcirc] \subsetneq\) MTL \([\mathsf{U}^s_I]\), in pointwise semantics. We also sharpen the decidability results by showing that, in the pointwise semantics, MTL \([\Diamond_I]\) (which is the least expressive amongst the unary fragments considered) already has non-primitive-recursive complexity and is \({\bf F}_{\omega^\omega}\)-hard for satisfiability checking over finite timed words, and that MTL [\(\Diamond_I\), I ] is undecidable and \(\Sigma_1^0\)-hard. Next we explore, in the pointwise models, the decidability of TPTL \([\Diamond_I]\) (unary TPTL) and show that 2-variables unary TPTL has undecidable satisfiability, while the single variable fragment TPTL[U s] incorporating even the most expressive operator U s operator is decidable over finite timed words. We provide a comprehensive picture of the decidability and expressiveness properties of unary fragments of TPTL and MTL over pointwise time.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Alur, R., Henzinger, T.A.: Logics and Models of Real Time: A Survey. In: Proceedings of REX Workshop, pp. 74–106 (1991)
Alur, R., Feder, T., Henzinger, T.A.: The Benefits of Relaxing Punctuality. Journal of the ACM 43(1), 116–146 (1996)
Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.B.: Some Recent Results in Metric Temporal Logic. In: Cassez, F., Jard, C. (eds.) FORMATS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5215, pp. 1–13. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)
Bouyer, P., Chevalier, F., Markey, N.: On the expressiveness of TPTL and MTL. In: Sarukkai, S., Sen, S. (eds.) FSTTCS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3821, pp. 432–443. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
D’Souza, D., Prabhakar, P.: On the expressiveness of MTL in the pointwise and continuous semantics. Technical Report IISc, India (2005)
D’Souza, D., Raj Mohan, M., Prabhakar, P.: Eliminating past operators in Metric Temporal Logic. In: Perspectives in Concurrency, pp. 86–106 (2008)
Demri, S., Lazic, R.: LTL with freeze quantifier and register automata. In: LICS 2006, pp. 17–26 (2006)
Etessami, K., Wilke, T.: An Until Hierarchy for Temporal Logic. In: Proceedings of LICS 1996, pp. 108–117 (1996)
Henzinger, T.A.: The Temporal Specification and Verification of Real-time Systems. Ph.D Thesis, Stanford University (1991)
Hirshfeld, Y., Rabinovich, A.: Logics for Real Time: Decidability and Complexity. Fundam. Inform. 62(1), 1–28 (2004)
Kini, D.R., Krishna, S.N., Pandya, P.K.: On Construction of Safety Signal Automata for MITL[U I , S I ] using Temporal Projections. In: Fahrenberg, U., Tripakis, S. (eds.) FORMATS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6919, pp. 225–239. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Koymans, R.: Specifying Real-Time Properties with Metric Temporal Logic. Real Time Systems 2(4), 255–299 (1990)
Maler, O., Nickovic, D., Pnueli, A.: Real Time Temporal Logic: Past, Present, Future. In: Pettersson, P., Yi, W. (eds.) FORMATS 2005. LNCS, vol. 3829, pp. 2–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Minsky, M.: Finite and infinite machines. Prentice Hall, New Jersey (1967)
Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.: On the Decidability of Metric Temporal Logic. In: Proceedings of LICS 2005, pp. 188–197 (2005)
Ouaknine, J., Worrell, J.B.: On Metric Temporal Logic and Faulty Turing Machines. In: Aceto, L., Ingólfsdóttir, A. (eds.) FOSSACS 2006. LNCS, vol. 3921, pp. 217–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Pandya, P.K., Shah, S.: On Expressive Powers of Timed Logics: Comparing Boundedness, Non-punctuality, and Deterministic Freezing. In: Katoen, J.-P., König, B. (eds.) CONCUR 2011. LNCS, vol. 6901, pp. 60–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Pandya, P.K., Shah, S.: The Unary Fragments of Metric Interval Temporal Logic: Bounded versus Lower Bound Constraints. In: Chakraborty, S., Mukund, M. (eds.) ATVA 2012. LNCS, vol. 7561, pp. 77–91. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)
Prabhakar, P., D’Souza, D.: On the Expressiveness of MTL with Past Operators. In: Asarin, E., Bouyer, P. (eds.) FORMATS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4202, pp. 322–336. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Chambart, P., Schnobelen, P.: The ordinal recursive complexity of lossy channel systems. In: Proceedings of LICS, pp. 205–216 (2008)
Schnobelen, P.: Verifying lossy channel systems has nonprimitive recursive complexity. Info. Proc. Lett. 83(5), 251–261 (2002)
Straubing, H.: Finite Automata, Formal Logic and Circuit Complexity. Birkhauser, Boston (1994)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Madnani, K., Krishna, S.N., Pandya, P.K. (2014). On Unary Fragments of MTL and TPTL over Timed Words. In: Ciobanu, G., Méry, D. (eds) Theoretical Aspects of Computing – ICTAC 2014. ICTAC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8687. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10882-7_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10882-7_20
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-10881-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-10882-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)