Skip to main content

Agreement Technologies – Towards Sophisticated Software Agents

  • Conference paper
  • 1753 Accesses

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8733))

Abstract

Nowadays, agreements and all the processes and mechanisms implicated in reaching agreements between different kinds of agents are a subject of perspective interdisciplinary scientific research. Newest trend in Agent Technology is to enhance agents with "social" abilities. Agreement Technologies brings new flavor in implementation of more sophisticated autonomous software agents that negotiate to achieve acceptable agreements.

The paper presents key concepts in this area and highlights influence of Agreement Technologies on development of more sophisticated multi-agent systems.

The work is partially supported by Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Serbia, through project no. OI174023: “Intelligent techniques and their integration into wide-spectrum decision support”

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alberola, J.M., Such, J.M., Botti, V., Espinosa, A., Garcıa-Fornes, A.: A Scalable Multiagent Platform for Large Systems. Computer Science and Information Systems 10(1), 51–77 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Argente, E., Boissier, O., Carrascosa, C., Fornara, N., McBurney, P., Noriega, P., Ricci, A., Sabater-Mir, J., Ignaz Schumacher, M., Tampitsikas, C., Taveter, K., Vizzari, G., Vouros, G.A.: Environment and Agreement Technologies. In: AT 2012, pp. 260–261 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boella, G., van der Torre, L.W.N.: Constitutive norms in the design of normative multiagent systems. In: Toni, F., Torroni, P. (eds.) CLIMA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3900, pp. 303–319. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Broersen, J., Dastani, M., van der Torre, L.: Beliefs, obligations, intentions and desires as components in an agent architecture. International Journal of Intelligent Systems 20(9), 893–920 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Cardoso, H.L., Urbano, J., Brandão, P., Rocha, A.P., Oliveira, E.C.: ANTE: Agreement Negotiation in Normative and Trust-Enabled Environments. In: PAAMS 2012, pp. 261-264 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  6. da Silva, V.T., Choren, R., de Lucena, C.J.P.: A UML based approach for modeling and implementing multi-agent systems. In: International Joint Conference on Proceedings of the Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 2, pp. 914–921. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dignum, V.: A model for organizational interaction: Based on agents, founded in logic. Ph.D. thesis, Universiteit Utrecht (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dimitrakos, T.: System models, e-risks and e-trust. In: Proceedings of the IFIP Conference on Towards the E-society: E-Commerce, E-Business, E-Government, I3E 2001, pp. 45–58. Kluwer, Deventer (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ferber, J., Gutknecht, O., Michel, F.: From agents to organizations: An organizational view of multi-agent systems. In: Giorgini, P., Müller, J.P., Odell, J.J. (eds.) AOSE 2003. LNCS, vol. 2935, pp. 214–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Gâteau, B., Boissier, O., Khadraoui, D., Dubois, E.: Moiseinst: An organizational model for specifying rights and duties of autonomous agents. In: Third European workshop on multi-agent systems (EUMAS 2005), Brussels, pp. 484–485 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Godbole, N., Srinivasaiah, M., Skiena, S.: Large-scale sentiment analysis for news and blogs. In: Proceedings of the international Conference on weblogs and social media (ICWSM), Salt Lake City (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gostojić, S., Milosavljević, B., Konjović, Z.: Ontological Model of Legal Norms for Creating and Using Legislation. Computer Science and Information Systems 10(1), 151–171 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heras, S.: Case-based argumentation framework for agent societies. Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Sistemas Informáticos y Computación. Universitat Politècnica de València (2011), http://hdl.handle.net/10251/12497 ,

  14. Horling, B., Lesser, V.: A survey of multi-agent organizational paradigms. The Knowledge Engineering Review 19(4), 281–316 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hübner, J.F., Sichman, J., Boissier, O.: A model for the structural, functional, and deontic specification of organizations in multi-agent systems. In: Bittencourt, G., Ramalho, G.L. (eds.) SBIA 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2507, pp. 118–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Huynh, T.D., Jennings, N.R., Shadbolt, N.R.: An integrated trust and reputation model for open multi-agent systems. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 13, 119–154 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ivanovic, M., Budimac, Z.: An overview of ontologies and data resources in medical domains. Expert Syst. Appl. 41(11), 5158–5166 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kirschner, P.A., Buckingham Shum, S.J., Carr, C.S.: Visualizing argumentation: Software tools for collaborative and educational sense-making. Springer, London (2003), http://oro.open.ac.uk/12107/

  19. Lesser, V., Decker, K., Wagner, T., Carver, N., Garvey, A., Horling, B., Neiman, D., Podorozhny, R., NagendraPrasad, M., Raja, A., Vincent, R., Xuan, P., Zhang, X.: Evolution of the gpgp/taems domain-independent coordination framework. In: Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, vol. 9(1), pp. 87–143. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ossowski, S.: Agreement Technologies. Springer Series: Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 8, XXXV, p. 645 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ossowski, S., Sierra, C., Botti, V.: Agreement Technologies: A Computing perspective. In: Ossowski, S. (ed.) Springer Series: Law, Governance and Technology Series, vol. 8, pp. 3–16 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Van Dyke Parunak, H., Odell, J.J.: Representing social structures in UML. In: Wooldridge, M.J., Weiß, G., Ciancarini, P. (eds.) AOSE 2001. LNCS, vol. 2222, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Polleres, A., Huynh, D.: Special issue: The web of data. Journal of Web Semantics 7(3), 135 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rahwan, I., Zablith, F., Reed, C.: Laying the foundations for a world wide argument web. Artificial Intelligence 171, 897–921 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ramchurn, S., Vytelingum, P., Rogers, A., Jennings, N.: Putting the “Smarts” into the smart grid: A grand challenge for artificial intelligence. Communications of the ACM 55(4), 86–97 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sabater-Mir, J., Paolucci, M.: On Representation and aggregation of social evaluations in computational trust and reputation models. International Journal of Approximate Reasoning 46(3), 458–483 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Savarimuthu, B.T.R., Cranefield, S., Purvis, M.A., Purvis, M.K.: Obligation norm identification in agent societies. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation 13(4) (2010), http://jasss.soc.surrey.ac.uk/13/4/3.html

  28. Sen, S., Airiau, S.: Emergence of norms through social learning. In: Proceedings of the Twentieth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), pp. 1507–1512. AAAI Press, Menlo Park (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Sterling, L., Taveter, K.: The art of agent-oriented modeling. MIT, Cambridge/London (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Shaheen, F.S., Wooldridge, M., Jennings, N.R.: Optimal Negotiation of Multiple Issues in Incomplete Information Settings. In: AAMAS 2004, pp. 1080–1087 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Tambe, M., Adibi, J., Alonaizon, Y., Erdem, A., Kaminka, G.A., Marsella, S., Muslea, I.: Building agent teams using an explicit teamwork model and learning. Artificial Intelligence 110(2), 215–239 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Vrdoljak, L., Podobnik, V., Jezic, G.: Forecasting the Acceptance of New Information Services by using the Semantic-aware Prediction Model. Computer Science and Information Systems 10(3), 1025–1052 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ivanović, M., Budimac, Z. (2014). Agreement Technologies – Towards Sophisticated Software Agents. In: Hwang, D., Jung, J.J., Nguyen, NT. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8733. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11289-3_1

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11288-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11289-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics