Skip to main content

Generic Components for BPMN Specifications

  • Conference paper
Perspectives in Business Informatics Research (BIR 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 194))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper introduces generic components to BPMN that reduce modelling efforts and ensure higher quality of specifications. The idea is transferred from task models to business process models. Some of the introduced components can be considered as patterns. Therefore, the paper discusses different views on patterns and their relations to reusable generic component. Additionally, different strategies for adaptation like design time adaptation and runtime adaptation of components are discussed. Parameter substitution is supported best by tools. Requirements for such support are finally collected and discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. BPMN, http://www.bpmn.org (last visited June 29, 2014)

  2. BPMN 2.0 Tutorial: Get Started with Process Modelling using BPMN, http://camunda.org/bpmn/tutorial.html (last visited June 29, 2014)

  3. OMG. BPMN 2.0 by Example, Version 1.0, OMG Document Number: dtc/2010-06-02, http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/examples/PDF (last visited March 5, 2014)

  4. Breedvelt-Schouten, I.M., Paternò, F., Severijns, C.: Reusable structures in task models. In: Proc. DSV-IS 1997, pp. 225–239 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brüning, J., Dittmar, A., Forbrig, P., Reichart, D.: Getting SW Engineers on Board: Task Modelling with Activity Diagrams. In: Gulliksen, J., Harning, M.B., van der Veer, G.C., Wesson, J. (eds.) EIS 2007. LNCS, vol. 4940, pp. 175–192. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. CTTE, http://giove.isti.cnr.it/tools/CTTE/last (visited April 22, 2014)

  7. P. Forbrig, C. Martinie, P. Palanque, M. Winckler: Rapid Task-Models Development using Sub-models, Sub-routines and Generic Components. submitted to HCSE 2014 in Paderborn (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gamma, E., Helm, R., Johnson, R., Vlissides, J.: Design patterns: Elements of reusable object-oriented software. Addison Wesley (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  9. HAMSTERS, http://www.irit.fr/ICS/hamsters/ (last visited April 22, 2014)

  10. Hubaux, A., Classen, A., Heymans, P.: Formal Modelling of Feature Configuration Workflows. In: SPLC 2009 Proceedings of the 13th International Software Product Line Conference, pp. 221–230 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Laue, R., Awad, A.: Visualization of Business Process Modeling Anti Patters. Electronic Communications of the EASST X, 1/12–12/12 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Radeke, F., Forbrig, P.: Patterns in Task-Based Modeling of User Interfaces. In: Winckler, M., Johnson, H. (eds.) TAMODIA 2007. LNCS, vol. 4849, pp. 184–197. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Rational Rose, http://www-03.ibm.com/software/products/en/rosemod (last visited April 22, 2014)

  14. Recker, J., Rosemann, M., van der Aalst, W., Mendlin, J.: On the Syntax of Reference Model Configuration – Transforming the C-EPC into Lawful EPC Models. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM 2005), pp. 60–75 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Mulyar, N.: Workflow Control-Flow Patterns: A Revised View, BPM Center Report BPM-06-22, BPMcenter.org (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Russell, N., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Wohed, P.: On the Suitability of UML 2.0 Activity Diagrams for Business Process Modelling. In: Stumptner, M., Hartmann, S., Kiyoki, Y. (eds.) Proceedings of the Third Asia-Pacific Conference on Conceptual Modelling (APCCM 2006). CRPIT, vol. 53, pp. 95–104. ACS, Hobart (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Scheer, A.-W.: Business Process Engineering: Reference Models for Industrial Enterprises. Springer (1994) ISBN-10: 3540582347

    Google Scholar 

  18. Scheer, A.-W., Jost, W., Güngöz, Ö.: A Reference model for industrial enterprises. In: Fettke, P., Loos, P. (eds.) Reference Modeling for Business Systems Analysis, pp. 166–181. Idea Group Publishing, Hershey (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Scheer, A.-W., Feld, T., Caspers, R.: BPM: new architecture driven by Business Process Planning and Control (BPPC). IM Journal for Information Management and Consulting (2) (2012), special print, https://www.scheerprocesstailor.com/tpl/download/IM-2012-Ausgabe2-Sonderdruck_EN_Homepage.pdf

  20. Scheer-Process-Tailor, https://www.scheerprocesstailor.com/ (last visited: April 22, 2014)

  21. Schobbens, P.-Y., Heymans, P., Trigaux, J.-C., Bontemps, Y.: Feature Diagrams: A Survey and A Formal Semantics. In: RE 2006, pp. 139–148 (September 2006)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Sinnig, D., Gaffar, A., Reichart, D., Seffah, A., Forbrig, P.: Patterns in Model-Based Engineering. In: Proc. CADUI 2004, pp. 195–208 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Together Software Modelling Tool, http://www.step-10.com/SoftwareTools/Together/introduction.html (last visited April 22, 2014)

  24. UML, http://www.uml.org (last visited June 29, 2014)

  25. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Basten, T.: Inheritance of Workflows: An Approach to Tackling Problems Related to Change. Theoretical Computer Science 270(1-2), 125–203 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van der Aalst, W.M.P., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Kiepuszewski, B., Barros, A.P.: Workflow Patterns. Distributed and Parallel Databases 14(3), 5–51 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dreiling, A., Gottschalk, F., Rosemann, M., Jansen-Vullers, M.H.: Configurable Process Models as a Basis for Reference Modeling. In: Proc. of the Workshop on Business Process Reference Models (BPRM 2005), pp. 76–82 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. White, S.A.: Process Modeling Notations and Workflow Patterns, BPTrends (March 2004), http://www.omg.org/bp-corner/bp-files/Process_Modeling_Notations.pdf (last visited at April 22, 2014)

  29. Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W.M.P., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A.H.M., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Forbrig, P. (2014). Generic Components for BPMN Specifications. In: Johansson, B., Andersson, B., Holmberg, N. (eds) Perspectives in Business Informatics Research. BIR 2014. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 194. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11370-8_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11370-8_15

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11369-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11370-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics