Skip to main content

A Prioritized Assertional-Based Revision for DL-Lite Knowledge Bases

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8761))

Abstract

DL-Lite is a powerful and tractable family of description logics. One of the fundamental issue in this area is the evolution or revision of knowledge bases. To this end, many approaches are recently developed for revising flat DL-Lite knowledge bases. This paper investigates “Prioritized Removed Sets Revision” (PRSR) in DL-Lite framework where the assertions or data are prioritized (for instance in case where the data are provided by multiple sources having different reliability levels). PRSR approach is based on inconsistency minimization in order to restore consistency where the minimality refers to the lexicographic criterion and not to the set inclusion one. We study different forms of incorporated information: an assertion, a positive inclusion axiom or a negative inclusion axiom. We show that under some conditions PRSR can be achieved in polynomial time. We give logical properties of the proposed operators in terms of satisfaction of Hansson’s postulates rephrased in DL-Lite framework. We finally show how to use the notion of hitting sets for computing prioritized removed sets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alchourrón, C.E., Gärdenfors, P., Makinson, D.: On the logic of theory change: Partial meet contraction and revision functions. J. Symb. Log. 50(2), 510–530 (1985)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Artale, A., Calvanese, D., Kontchakov, R., Zakharyaschev, M.: The dl-lite family and relations. J. Artif. Intell. Res (JAIR) 36, 1–69 (2009)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benferhat, S., Ben-Naim, J., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: An answer set programming encoding of prioritized removed sets revision: application to gis. Appl. Intell. 32(1), 60–87 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Benferhat, S., Bouraoui, Z., Papini, O., Würbel, E.: Assertional-based removed sets revision of DL-Lite R knowledge bases. In: ISAIM (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H.: How to infer from inconsisent beliefs without revising. In: IJCAI, pp. 1449–1457 (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Benferhat, S., Dubois, D., Prade, H., Williams, M.-A.: A practical approach to revising prioritized knowledge bases. Studia Logica 70(1), 105–130 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Bienvenu, M., Rosati, R.: New inconsistency-tolerant semantics for robust ontology-based data access. In: Eiter, T., Glimm, B., Kazakov, Y., Krötzsch, M. (eds.) Description Logics. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1014, pp. 53–64. CEUR-WS.org (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Calvanese, D., Giacomo, G.D., Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R.: Tractable reasoning and efficient query answering in description logics: The dl-lite family. J. Autom. Reasoning 39(3), 385–429 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Calvanese, D., Kharlamov, E., Nutt, W., Zheleznyakov, D.: Evolution of dl-lite knowledge bases. In: Patel-Schneider, P.F., Pan, Y., Hitzler, P., Mika, P., Zhang, L., Pan, J.Z., Horrocks, I., Glimm, B. (eds.) ISWC 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6496, pp. 112–128. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Flouris, G., Plexousakis, D., Antoniou, G.: On applying the agm theory to dls and owl. In: Gil, Y., Motta, E., Benjamins, V.R., Musen, M.A. (eds.) ISWC 2005. LNCS, vol. 3729, pp. 216–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Fuhrmann, A.: An essay on contraction. CSLI Publications, Stanford (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gao, S., Qi, G., Wang, H.: A new operator for abox revision in dl-lite. In: Hoffmann, J., Selman, B. (eds.) AAAI. AAAI Press (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hansson, S.O.: Revision of belief sets and belief bases. Handbook of Defeasible Reasoning and Uncertainty Management Systems 3, 17–75 (1998)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Hué, J., Würbel, E., Papini, O.: Removed sets fusion: Performing off the shelf. In: Proc. of ECAI 2008 (FIAI 178), pp. 94–98 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lembo, D., Lenzerini, M., Rosati, R., Ruzzi, M., Savo, D.F.: Inconsistency-tolerant semantics for description logics. In: Hitzler, P., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) RR 2010. LNCS, vol. 6333, pp. 103–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Papini, O.: A complete revision function in propositional calculus. In: ECAI, pp. 339–343 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Qi, G., Ji, Q., Haase, P.: A conflict-based operator for mapping revision. In: Bernstein, A., Karger, D.R., Heath, T., Feigenbaum, L., Maynard, D., Motta, E., Thirunarayan, K. (eds.) ISWC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5823, pp. 521–536. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Qi, G., Liu, W., Bell, D.A.: A revision-based approach to handling inconsistency in description logics. Artif. Intell. Rev. 26(1-2), 115–128 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Qi, G., Pan, J.: A stratfication-based approach for inconsistency handling in description logics. In: IWOD 2007, p. 83 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Reiter, R.: A theory of diagnosis from first principles. Artif. Intell. 32(1), 57–95 (1987)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wang, Z., Wang, K., Topor, R.W.: A new approach to knowledge base revision in dl-lite. In: Fox, M., Poole, D. (eds.) AAAI. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Wilkerson, R.W., Greiner, R., Smith, B.A.: A correction to the algorithm in reiter’s theory of diagnosis. Artificial Intelligence 41, 79–88 (1989)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Würbel, E., Jeansoulin, R., Papini, O.: Revision: An application in the framework of GIS. In: Cohn, A.G., Giunchiglia, F., Selman, B. (eds.) KR, pp. 505–515. Morgan Kaufmann (2000)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Benferhat, S., Bouraoui, Z., Papini, O., Würbel, E. (2014). A Prioritized Assertional-Based Revision for DL-Lite Knowledge Bases. In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_31

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11558-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics