Skip to main content

Tight Complexity Bounds for Reasoning in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\)

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8761))

Abstract

Recently, Bayesian extensions of Description Logics, and in particular the logic \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\), were introduced as a means of representing certain knowledge that depends on an uncertain context. In this paper we introduce a novel structure, called proof structure, that encodes the contextual information required to deduce subsumption relations from a \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\) knowledge base. Using this structure, we show that probabilistic reasoning in \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\) can be reduced in polynomial time to standard Bayesian network inferences, thus obtaining tight complexity bounds for reasoning in \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Baader, F., Brandt, S., Lutz, C.: Pushing the \(\mathcal{EL}\) envelope. In: Proc. IJCAI 2005. Morgan Kaufmann (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Baader, F., Calvanese, D., McGuinness, D.L., Nardi, D., Patel-Schneider, P.F. (eds.): The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R.: Automata-based axiom pinpointing. J. of Automated Reasoning 45(2), 91–129 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Baader, F., Peñaloza, R., Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Suntisrivaraporn, B.: Pinpointing in the description logic \(\mathcal{EL}^+\). In: Hertzberg, J., Beetz, M., Englert, R. (eds.) KI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4667, pp. 52–67. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brandt, S.: Polynomial time reasoning in a description logic with existential restrictions, GCI axioms, and—what else? In: Proc. ECAI 2004, pp. 298–302. IOS Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ceylan, İ.İ.: Context-Sensitive Bayesian Description Logics. Master’s thesis, Dresden University of Technology, Germany (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Ceylan, İ.İ., Peñaloza, R.: The Bayesian Description Logic \(\mathcal{BEL}\). In: Demri, S., Kapur, D., Weidenbach, C. (eds.) IJCAR 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8562, pp. 480–494. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Ceylan, İ.İ., Peñaloza, R.: Bayesian Description Logics. In: Bienvenu, M., Ortiz, M., Rosati, R., Simkus, M. (eds.) Proceedings of the 27th International Workshop on Description Logics (DL 2014). CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1193, pp. 447–458. CEUR-WS (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, G.F.: The computational complexity of probabilistic inference using Bayesian belief networks (research note). Artif. Intel. 42(2-3), 393–405 (1990)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. da Costa, P.C.G., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J.: PR-OWL: A Bayesian ontology language for the semantic web. In: da Costa, P.C.G., d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Laskey, K.B., Laskey, K.J., Lukasiewicz, T., Nickles, M., Pool, M. (eds.) URSW 2005 - 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5327, pp. 88–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. d’Amato, C., Fanizzi, N., Lukasiewicz, T.: Tractable reasoning with Bayesian description logics. In: Greco, S., Lukasiewicz, T. (eds.) SUM 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5291, pp. 146–159. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Darwiche, A.: Modeling and Reasoning with Bayesian Networks. Cambridge University Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Homola, M., Serafini, L.: Contextualized knowledge repositories for the semantic web. In: Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, vol. 12 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Klarman, S., Gutiérrez-Basulto, V.: \(\mathcal{ALC}_\mathcal{ALC}\): A context description logic. In: Janhunen, T., Niemelä, I. (eds.) JELIA 2010. LNCS, vol. 6341, pp. 208–220. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Koller, D., Friedman, N.: Probabilistic Graphical Models - Principles and Techniques. MIT Press (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Koller, D., Levy, A.Y., Pfeffer, A.: P-classic: A tractable probablistic description logic. In: Proc. 14th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 1997), pp. 390–397. AAAI Press (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lukasiewicz, T., Straccia, U.: Managing uncertainty and vagueness in description logics for the semantic web. J. of Web Semantics 6(4), 291–308 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lutz, C., Schröder, L.: Probabilistic description logics for subjective uncertainty. In: Lin, F., Sattler, U., Truszczynski, M. (eds.) KR. AAAI Press (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Niepert, M., Noessner, J., Stuckenschmidt, H.: Log-linear description logics. In: Walsh, T. (ed.) IJCAI, pp. 2153–2158. IJCAI/AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Pan, H., McMichael, D., Lendjel, M.: Inference algorithms in Bayesian networks and the probanet system. Digital Signal Processing 8(4), 231–243 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Riguzzi, F., Bellodi, E., Lamma, E., Zese, R.: Epistemic and statistical probabilistic ontologies. In: Proc. 8th Int. Workshop on Uncertainty Reasoning for the Semantic Web (URSW 2012), vol. 900, pp. 3–14. CEUR-WS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Roth, D.: On the hardness of approximate reasoning. Artif. Intel. 82(1-2), 273–302 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shimony, E.S.: Finding MAPs for belief networks is NP-hard. Artif. Intell. 68(2), 399–410 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Simancik, F., Kazakov, Y., Horrocks, I.: Consequence-based reasoning beyond horn ontologies. In: Proc. IJCAI 2011, pp. 1093–1098. IJCAI/AAAI (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ceylan, İ.İ., Peñaloza, R. (2014). Tight Complexity Bounds for Reasoning in the Description Logic \(\mathcal{BE{\kern-.1em}L}\) . In: Fermé, E., Leite, J. (eds) Logics in Artificial Intelligence. JELIA 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8761. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11558-0_6

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11557-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11558-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics