Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Beta Version of Implementation Tool for SURE Model

  • Conference paper
Knowledge-Based Software Engineering (JCKBSE 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 466))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

This paper describes beta version of implementation tool which we developed to test structure oriented evaluation model for e-learning. The structure oriented evaluation (SURE) model consists of eight steps where included all essential parts of evaluation processes. The Mongolian University of Science and Technology and Technische Universitaet Chemnitz first time used this evaluation model for inner evaluation processes. To test advantages of SURE model we developed web based application - tool for SURE model. The beta version of tool was used in evaluation processes of above mentioned two universities. This application includes main functions of evaluation process: to create online survey based in the evaluation goal structures, to collect data online, to process data using calculation rules of SURE model, to produce graphical and statistical diagrams by evaluation scores.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alkin, M.C.: Evaluation Theory Development. Evaluation Comment 2, 2–7 (1969)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Alkin, M.C., Fitz-Gibbon, C.T.: Methods and Theories of Evaluating Programs. Journal of Research and Development in Education 8(3), 2–15 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Alkin, M.C., Christie, C.A.: An Evaluation Theory Tree, pp. 12–65. SAGE Press (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Community Tool Box. A Framework for Program Evaluation: A Gateway to Tools, ch. 36. Work Group for Community Health and Development at the University of Kansas (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. E-learning quality, Aspects and criteria for evaluation of e-learning in higher education. Hoegskoleverket, Swedish National Agency for Higher Education, Report 2008:11 R (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Colace, F., De Santo, M., Vento, M.: E-learning platform: Developing an Evaluation, Strategy in a Real Case. In: Frontiers in Education 35th Annual Conference, pp. 20–25

    Google Scholar 

  7. Colace, F., De Santo, M., Pietrosanto, A.: Evaluation Models for E-Learning Platform: an AHP approach. In: 36th ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference, pp. 1–6 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ehlers, U.D.: Quality in e-learning: use and dissemination of quality approaches in European e-learning: a study by the European Quality Observatory. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ehlers, U.D., Pawlowski, J.M. (eds.): Handbook of Quality and Standardisation in E-Learning. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ehlers, U.D.: Low Cost, Community Based Certification for E-learning in Capacity Building, Bonn (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Joint Committee on Educational Evaluation, Sanders, J.R. (Chair): The program evaluation standards: how to assess evaluations of educational programs. Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Khan, B.H.: The People, process and product continuum in e-learning: The e-learning P3 model. Educational Technology 44(5), 33–40 (2004) http://asianvu.com/bookstoread/etp/elearning-p3model.pdf

  13. Khan, B.H.: Managing e-learning: Design, delivery, implementation and evaluation. Information Science Publishing, Hershey (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Khan, B.H.: Flexible Learning in an Information Society. IGI Global, Hershey (2006)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Kirkpatrick, D.L.: Techniques for evaluating training programs. Journal of American Society of Training Directors 13(3), 21–26 (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kirkpatrick, D.L.: Evaluating Training Programs. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc. (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kirkpatrick, D.L., Kirkpatrick, J.D.: Evaluating Training Programs, The Four Levels, 3rd edn., San Francisco (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lam, P., McNaught, C.: A Three-Layered Cyclic Model of ELearning Development and Evaluation. Journal of Interactive Learning Research 19(2), 313–329 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Messick, S.J.: The Once and Future Issues of Validity: Assessing the Meaning and Consequences of Measurement, ETS Research Report. RR-86-30 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Messick, S.J.: The Interplay of Evidence and Consequences in the Validation of Performance Assessments. Educational Researcher 23(2), 13–23 (1994), http://edr.sagepub.com/content/23/2/13.full.pdf

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Patton, M.Q.: Qualitative Evaluation Methods. Sage Publication, Beverly Hills (1980)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Patton, M.Q.: Utilization-focused evaluation. Sage Publications, Inc. Ruhe,V and Zumbo, B. D, Evaluation in distance education and learning: the unfolding model. The Guilford Press, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Phillips, J.J.: Handbook of Evaluation and Measurement Methods. Gulf Press, London (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Phillips, J.J.: Return on Investment in Training and Performance Improvement Programs. Gulf Publishing Co., Houston (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Phillips, P.P., Phillips, J.J.: ROI Fundamentals: Why and When to Measure Return on Investment (Measurement and Evaluation Series). Pfeiffer, San Francisco (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Phillips, P.P., et al.: ASTD Handbook of Measuring and evaluating training. ASDT, Alex-andria (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Ruhe, V., Zumbo, B.D.: Evaluation in distance education and elearning: the unfolding model. The Guilford Press, New York (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Stufflebeam, D.L.: The CIPP model for Program Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services 6, 117–141 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Stufflebeam, D.L.: The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services 49, 279–317 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shadish, W.: Evaluation theory is who we are. American Journal of Evaluation 19(1), 1–19 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Scriven, M.S., et al.: The methodology of evaluation. In: Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, AERA Monograph Series on Curriculum Evaluation, vol. (1), pp. 39–81. Rand McNally, Chicago (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Scriven, M.S.: Pros and cons about goal-free evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation 12(1), 55–76 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scriven, M.S.: The nature of evaluation part II: Training. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation 6(12), 1–5 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Stufflebeam, D.L.: The CIPP model for Program Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services 6, 117–141 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Stufflebeam, D.L.: The CIPP Model for Evaluation. Evaluation in Education and Human Services 49, 279–317 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Taylor-Powell, E., Henert, E.: Developing a logic model: Teaching and training guide. Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System. Program Development and Evaluation, Madison (2008), http://www.uwex.edu/ces/pdande/evaluation/pdf/lmguidecomplete.pdf

  37. Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W.: A new evaluation model for eLearning programs. Technical Report CSR-11-03, Chemnitz University of Technology, Chemnitz, Germany (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Tudevdagva, U., Hardt, W.: A measure theoretical evaluation model for e-learning programs. In: Proceedings of the IADIS on e-Society 2012, Berlin, Germany, March 10-13, pp. 44–52 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Tyler, R.W.: Basic principles of curriculum and instruction. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Tyler, R.W.: General statement of evaluation. The Journal of Educational Research 35(4), 492–501 (1972)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  41. Weiss, C.: Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation? American Journal of Evaluation 19(1), 21–33 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Yarbrough, D.B., Shulha, L.M., Hopson, R.K., Caruthers, F.A.: The Program Evaluation Standards: A Guide for Evaluators and Evaluation Users, 3rd edn. Sage Publications (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Zaharias, P., Poulymenakou, A.: Developing a usability evaluation method for e-learning applications: beyond functional usability. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 25(1), 75–98 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Addpoll, http://www.addpoll.com/

  45. Easy polls, http://www.easypolls.net/

  46. Esurv, http://esurv.org/

  47. Esurvey creator, https://www.esurveycreator.com

  48. Esurveyspro, http://www.esurveyspro.com/free-onlinesurvey.aspx

  49. Fluid Surveys, http://uidsurveys.com/

  50. Free online survyes, http://freeonlinesurveys.com/

  51. Iperceptions, http://signup.iperceptions.com/

  52. Kwik Survey, http://kwiksurveys.com/

  53. OnlQuestionform, http://questionform.com/

  54. Panelplace, http://www.panelplace.com/

  55. Questionpro, http://www.questionpro.com/

  56. Quick Surveys, https://www.quicksurveys.com/

  57. Sogo survey, http://www.sogosurvey.com/

  58. Stellar survey, http://stellarsurvey.com/

  59. Survey Monkey, https://de.surveymonkey.com

  60. Survey planet, https://www.surveyplanet.com/

  61. Surveycrest, http://www.surveycrest.com/

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mongolian University of Science and Technology, Ulaanbaatar, Mongolia

    Uranchimeg Tudevdagva & Tumurchudur Lkham

  2. Technische Universitaet Chemnitz, Chemnitz, Germany

    Uranchimeg Tudevdagva & Wolfram Hardt

Authors
  1. Uranchimeg Tudevdagva
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tumurchudur Lkham
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfram Hardt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Volgograd State Technical University, Lenin av., 64/1, k.20, Volgograd, Russia

    Alla Kravets

  2. Volgograd State Technical University, Lenin av., 28, k.1406, Volgograd, Russia

    Maxim Shcherbakov

  3. Volgograd State Technical University, Lenin av., 28, k.904, Volgograd, Russia

    Marina Kultsova

  4. Department of Administration Engineering, Keio University, 3-14-1 Hiyoshi, Kohoku-ku, P.O. Box, 223-8522, Yokohama-shi, Kanagawa-ken, Japan

    Tadashi Iijima

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Tudevdagva, U., Lkham, T., Hardt, W. (2014). The Beta Version of Implementation Tool for SURE Model. In: Kravets, A., Shcherbakov, M., Kultsova, M., Iijima, T. (eds) Knowledge-Based Software Engineering. JCKBSE 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 466. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11854-3_21

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11853-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11854-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation