Skip to main content

Towards Empirical Modelling of Knowledge Transfer in Teaching/Learning Process

  • Conference paper
Book cover Information and Software Technologies (ICIST 2014)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 465))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Educational systems are complex adaptive systems with basic properties of openness, nonlinearity, feedback and adaptivity.Modelling and assessment of a teaching/learning process is a difficult task that involves many factors at multiple dimensions (pedagogical, technological, organizational, social, etc.). Common methods used for evaluation of teaching/learning effectiveness such as surveys, questionnaires and tests are subjective and lack of statistical control and standards for comparison. In this paper, we propose an empirical knowledge transfer model for closed teacher-learner systems and its extension for open teacher-learner systems. The model is based on the theory of communication in noisy channels with additive white Gaussian noise. We describe the pedagogical interpretation of the model’s parameters and describe its application in modelling the transfer of knowledge in the teaching/learning process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Rocha, L.M.: Complex Systems Modeling: Using Metaphors From Nature in Simulation and Scientific Models. In: BITS: Computer and Communications News. Computing, Information, and Communications Division. Los Alamos National Laboratory (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Johnson, N.F.: Two’s Company, Three is Complexity: A simple guide to the science of all sciences. Oneworld, Oxford (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Morrison, K.R.B.: Complexity Theory and Education. In: APERA Conference, Hong Kong (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Jorg, T., Davis, B., Nickmans, G.: Towards a new, complexity science of learning and education. Educational Research Review 2, 145–156 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Clarke, A., Collins, S.: Complexity science and student teacher supervision. Teaching and Teacher Education 23, 160–172 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Khan, B.H.: Managing E-Learning: Design, Delivery, Implementation and Evaluation. Information Science Pub. (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wiley, D.A.: Learning Object Design and Sequencing Theory. PhD Thesis, Brigham Young University (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Piskurich, G.M.: The AMA Handbook of E-Learning: Effective Design, Implementation, and Technology Solutions. AMACOM (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Janson, A., Janson, R.: Integrating Digital Learning Objects in the Classroom: A Need for Educational Leadership. Innovate 5(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hannum, W.: A Pedagogy for Learning Objects: The Theoretical and Empirical Basis. In: Interactive Mobile and Computer Aided Learning Conference, Amman, Jordan (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Štuikys, V., Damaševičius, R.: Towards Knowledge-Based Generative Learning Objects. Information Technology and Control 36(2), 202–212 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haughey, M., Muirhead, B.: Evaluating learning objects for schools. E-Journal of Instructional Science and Technology 8(1) (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wirth, K.R., Perkins, D.: Knowledge Surveys: An Indispensable Course Design and Assessment Tool. Innovations in the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Martin, J.R.: Evaluating Faculty Based on Student Opinions. Issues in Accounting Education, 1079–1094 (November 1998)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Nuhfer, E.B., Knipp, D.: The knowledge survey: A tool for all reasons. To Improve the Academy 21, 59–78 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Schoner, V., Buzza, D., Harrigan, K., Strampel, K.: Learning objects in use: ’Lite’ assessment for field studies. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching 1(1), 1–18 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Cohen, P.A.: Student ratings of instruction and student achievement: A meta-analysis of multisection validity studies. Review of Educational Research 51(3), 281–309 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ju, T., Lin, C., Tran, H., Ju, P.: Knowledge transfer in higher education. In: Effective Teaching in Taiwan vs. Thailand, 2006 ACME Annual Meeting, Honolulu, Hawaii USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Heilprin, L.B., Goodman, F.L.: Analogy Between Information Retrieval and Education. American Documentation 16, 163–169 (1965)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kanagaretnam, K., Thevaranjan, A.: Grade inflation: causes and cures. Syracuse University (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cordier, P., France, M.M., Pailhous, J., Bolon, P.: Entropy as a global variable of the learning process. Human Movement Science 13(6) (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh, V.A., Pathak, P., Pandey, P.: An entropic measure for the teaching-learning process. Physica A 388, 4453–4458 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Bordogna, C.M., Albano, E.V.: Theoretical Description of Teaching-Learning Processes: A Multidisciplinary Approach. Phys. Rev. Lett. 87(11), 118701 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Yeung, Y.: Scientific Modeling of Technology-Mediated Collaborative Learning Processes. In: Proc. of Conference on Learning by Effective Utilization of Technologies: Facilitating Intercultural Understanding, pp. 249–256. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Nitta, H.: Mathematical theory of peer-instruction dynamics. Physical Review Special Topics - Physics Education Research 6, 020105-1– 020105-4(2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Ogawa, K., Nakamura, Y., Yasutake, K., Yamakawa, O.: Mathematical Model For Collaborative Learning: Acquiring Hierarchic-Structured Knowledge. In: Proc. of the 21st International Conference on Computers in Education, Bali, Indonesia (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Patriarcheas, K., Xenos, M.: Modelling of distance education forum: Formal languages as interpretation methodology of messages in asynchronous text-based discussion. Computers & Education 52(2), 438–448 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Shannon, C.E.: Communication in the presence of noise. Proc. of Institute of Radio Engineers 37(1), 10–21 (1949)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  29. Bruggeman, H., Legge, G.E.: Psychophysics of Reading XIX. Hypertext Search and Retrieval with Low Vision. Proceedings of the IEEE 90, 94–103 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Reed, C.M., Durlach, N.I.: Note on Information Transfer Rates in Human Communication. Presence 7(5), 509–518 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Ziefle, M.: Effects of display resolution on visual performance. Human Factors 40(4), 555–568 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Williams, J.R.: Guidelines for the use of multimedia in instruction. In: Proc.of the 42nd Annual Meeting on Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, pp. 1447–1451 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Yuan, J., Liberman, M., Cieri, C.: Towards an integrated understanding of speaking rate in conversation. In: Proc. of Interspeech 2006, pp. 541–544 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Dillon, H., Massie, R.: The Impact of Sound-Field Amplification. Australian Journal of Education 50(1), 62–77 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Resnick, L.B., Zurawsky, C.: Class Size: Counting Students Can Count. Research Points 1(2) (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  36. Bressoux, P., Kramarz, F., Prost, C.: Teachers Training, Class Size and Students Outcomes: Learning from Administrative Forecasting Mistakes. The Economic Journal 119(536), 540–561 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bandiera, O., Larcinese, V., Rasul, I.: Heterogeneous Class Size Effects: New Evidence from a Panel of University Students. The Economic Journal 120(549), 1365–1398 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Monks, J., Schmidt, R.: The impact of class size and number of students on outcomes in higher education. Cornell University (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  39. Becker, K.A.: History of the Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales: Content and Psychometrics. Stanford-Binet Intelligence Scales, 5th Edition Assessment Service Bulletin, vol. 4. Riverside Publishing, Itasca (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Damaševičius, R. (2014). Towards Empirical Modelling of Knowledge Transfer in Teaching/Learning Process. In: Dregvaite, G., Damasevicius, R. (eds) Information and Software Technologies. ICIST 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 465. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-11958-8_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-11957-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-11958-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics