Skip to main content

Single-Preference Consensus Measures Based on Models of Ecological Evenness

  • Conference paper

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8825))

Abstract

We investigate the relationship between consensus measures used in different settings depending on how voters or experts express their preferences. We propose some new models for single-preference voting, which we derive from the evenness concept in ecology, and show that some of these can be placed within the framework of existing consensus measures using the discrete distance. Finally, we suggest some generalizations of the single-preference consensus measures allowing the incorporation of more general notions of distance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alonso, S., Pérez, I.J., Cabrerizo, F.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A linguistic consensus model for web 2.0 communities. Applied Soft Computing 13(1), 149–157 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Beliakov, G., Calvo, T., James, S.: Consensus measures constructed from aggregation functions and fuzzy implications. Knowledge-Based Systems 55, 1–8 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Beliakov, G., James, S., Calvo, T.: Aggregating fuzzy implications to measure group consensus. In: Proc. Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 1016–1021 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Beliakov, G., James, S., Nimmo, D.: Can indices of ecological evenness be used to measure consensus? In: Proc. of FUZZIEEE, Beijing, China (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bosch, R.: Characterizations of Voting Rules and Consensus Measures, Ph.D. Thesis. Universiteit van Tilburg (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bulla, L.: An index of evenness and its associated diversity measure. Oikos 70, 167–171 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cabrerizo, F., Moreno, J., Pérez, I., Herrera-Viedma, E.: Analyzing consensus approaches in fuzzy group decision making: advantages and drawbacks. Soft Computing 14, 451–463 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cabrerizo, F.J., Alonso, S., Pérez, I.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: On consensus measures in fuzzy group decision making. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y. (eds.) MDAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5285, pp. 86–97. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Cabrerizo, F.J., Chiclana, F., Uren̈a, M.R., Herrera-Videma, E.: Challenges and open questions in soft consensus models. In: Proc. Joint IFSA World Congress and NAFIPS Annual Meeting, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 944–949 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chiclana, F., Tapia García, J.M., del Moral, M.J., Herrera-Viedma, E.: A statistical comparative study of different similarity measures of consensus in group decision making. Information Sciences 221, 110–123 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dalton, H.: The measurement of the inequality of incomes. The Economic Journal 30, 348–361 (1920)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Consensus measures generated by weighted Kemeny distances on weak orders. In: Proceedings of ISDA, Cairo, Egypt, pp. 463–468 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  13. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Measuring consensus in weak orders. In: Herrera-Viedma, E., García-Lapresta, J., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M., Nurmi, H., Zadrożny, S. (eds.) Consensual Processes. STUDFUZZ, vol. 267, pp. 213–234. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. García-Lapresta, J.L., Pérez-Román, D.: Consensus-based hierarchical agglomerative clustering in the context of weak orders. In: Proceedings of IFSA World Congress, Edmonton, Canada, pp. 1010–1015 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  15. García-Lapresta, J.L., Román, D.P.: Some measures of consensus generated by distances on weak orders. In: Proceedings of XIV Congreso Español sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy, Cuencas Mineras, September 17-19, pp. 477–483 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Heip, C.: A new index measuring evenness. Journal of Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom 54(3), 555–557 (1974)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Heiser, W.J., D’Ambrosio, A.: Clustering and prediction of rankings within a Kemeny distance framework. In: Algorithms from and for Nature and Life, pp. 19–31. Springer International Publishing (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Herrera-Viedma, E., Herrera, F., Chiclana, F.: A consensus model for multiperson decision making with different preference structures. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics – Part A: Systems and Humans 32, 394–402 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Krebs, C.J.: Ecological Methodology. Harper Collins, New York (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Martín, J., Mayor, G.: Multi-argument distances. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 167, 92–100 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Pielou, E.C.: An Introduction to Mathematical Ecology. Wiley-Interscience, New York (1969)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Ricotta, C.: A recipe for unconventional evenness measures. Acta Biotheoretica 52, 95–104 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W.: The mathematical theory of communication. Univ. of Illinois Press, Urbana (1949)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson, E.H.: Measurement of diversity. Nature 163, 688 (1949)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Smith, B., Wilson, J.B.: A consumer’s guide to evenness indices. Oikos 76, 70–82 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Szmidt, E., Kacprzyk, J.: Analysis of consensus under intuitionistic fuzzy preferences. In: Proc. Int. Conf. in Fuzzy Logic and Technology, Leicester, pp. 79–82, De Montfort University (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Taillie, C.: Species equitibility: a comparative approach. In: Ecological Diversity in Theory and Practice, pp. 51–62. Int. Coop. Publ. House, Fairland (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Tastle, W.J., Wierman, M.J., Dumdum, U.R.: Ranking ordinal scales using the consensus measure. Issues in Information Systems 185, 96–102 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Tuomisto, H.: An updated consumer’s guide to evenness and related indices. Oikos 121, 1203–1218 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Williams, C.B.: Patterns in the balance of nature. Academic Press, London (1964)

    Google Scholar 

  31. Xu, Z., Cai, X.: Group consensus algorithms based on preference relations. Information Sciences 181, 150–162 (2011)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Xu, Z., Cai, X.: On consensus of group decision making with interval utility values and interval preference orderings. Group Decision and Negotiation 22, 997–1019 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yager, R.R.: On the specificity of a possibility distribution. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 50, 279–292 (1992)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Beliakov, G., James, S., Smith, L. (2014). Single-Preference Consensus Measures Based on Models of Ecological Evenness. In: Torra, V., Narukawa, Y., Endo, Y. (eds) Modeling Decisions for Artificial Intelligence. MDAI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8825. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12054-6_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12054-6_5

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12053-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12054-6

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics