Skip to main content

Rough Sets Theory Approch to Extenics Risk Assessment Model in Social Risk

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2014 (ISNN 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 8866))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 4196 Accesses

Abstract

Social risks in large-scale projects are ranked according to the results of risk assessment, and the order helps assign the resource priority for the high risk events. The common method of risk evaluation is mostly based on probability and consequences of risk events, but ignores the management properties of them. This paper combines rough sets theory and extenics theory, and then builds the extenics risk assessment model based on rough sets theory. This model eliminates some valueless indicators and evaluates their weights using the rough sets theory and calculates the risk grades by extenics evaluation. In the last part, this paper analyzes an airport construction project to prove the practicality and effectiveness of the model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Ulrich, B., Joost, V.L.: The risk society and beyond: critical issues for social theory. Sage (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Holzmann, R., Jørgensen, S.: Social Risk Management: A new conceptual framework for Social Protection, and beyond. International Tax and Public Finance 8(4), 529–556 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li, S.M.: A Summarize on the Project Risk Sequencing. Sci./Tech. Information Development & Economy 1, 158–160 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Haimes, Y.Y.: Risk modeling, assessment, and management, vol. 40. John Wiley & Sons (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ward, S.C.: Assessing and managing important risks. International Journal of Project Management 17(6), 331–336 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cai, W.: Extension theory and its application. Chinese Science Bulletin 44(17), 1538–1548 (1999)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Baccarini, D., Richard, A.: The risk ranking of projects: a methodology. International Journal of Project Management 19(3), 139–145 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Pawlak, Z.: Rough sets. International Journal of Computer & Information Sciences 11(5), 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Ayyub, B.M.: Risk analysis in engineering and economics. CRC Press (2014)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yaodong Le .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gu, G., Le, Y., Wei, F., Li, C. (2014). Rough Sets Theory Approch to Extenics Risk Assessment Model in Social Risk. In: Zeng, Z., Li, Y., King, I. (eds) Advances in Neural Networks – ISNN 2014. ISNN 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8866. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12436-0_36

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-12436-0_36

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-12435-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-12436-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics