Skip to main content

Demographic and Psychographic Estimation of Twitter Users Using Social Structures

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Online Social Media Analysis and Visualization

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Social Networks ((LNSN))

Abstract

Word-of-mouth marketing on social media has become more urgent with the increasing number of users and posts, and it is important to estimate user attributes because most users on Twitter do not reveal their attributes. We propose new methods for estimating user attributes of a Twitter user from the user’s contents (a profile document and tweets) and social neighbors, i.e. those with whom the user has mentioned. This study has three contributions on the task of user attribute estimation. First, we investigate a labeling method that finds the users associated with a blog account and uses their profile attributes on blog as true labels of training tweet data. We confirm that using the blog labels achieved higher accuracy than manual labeling and pattern matching methods, with respect to four attributes (gender, age, occupation, and interests). Second, we validate the best way to combine bag-of-words features of profile documents and tweets. We evaluate nine combining methods and show that words in profile documents should be treated distinctively from those in tweets. Third, we reveal that to adjust amount of information from social neighbors affects estimation accuracy. We experiment three adjustment levels and show that our method, which utilizes the target user’s profile document and tweets and the neighbors’ profile documents (not including tweets), achieved the best accuracy. Overall experiments conducted on the estimation of the four attributes show that our method achieved higher accuracy than conventional methods that use manually-labeled tweets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://www.facebook.com/.

  2. 2.

    https://twitter.com/.

  3. 3.

    http://newsroom.fb.com/Key-Facts.

  4. 4.

    http://blog.twitter.com/2013/03/celebrating-twitter7.html.

  5. 5.

    http://mashable.com/2012/04/23/facebook-now-has-901-million-users/.

  6. 6.

    A friend is another Twitter user whom you are following.

  7. 7.

    A Tweet by another user, forwarded to you by someone you follow.

  8. 8.

    https://www.mturk.com/.

  9. 9.

    http://www.csie.ntu.edu.tw/~cjlin/liblinear/.

  10. 10.

    The tendency of individuals to associate and bond with similar others.

References

  1. Akaike H (1974) A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Trans Autom Control 19(6):716–723

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Burger JD, Henderson J, Kim G, Zarrella G (2011) Discriminating gender on Twitter. In: EMNLP, pp 1301–1309

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cheng Z, Caverlee J, Lee K (2010) You are where you tweet: a content-based approach to geo-locating Twitter users. In: CIKM, pp 759–768

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chu Z, Gianvecchio S, Wang H, Jajodia S (2010) Who is tweeting on Twitter: human, bot, or cyborg? In: ACSAC, pp 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  5. Conover M, Gonçalves B, Ratkiewicz J, Flammini A, Menczer F (2011) Predicting the political alignment of Twitter users. In: SocialCom, pp 192–199

    Google Scholar 

  6. Eisenstein J, O’Connor B, Smith NA, Xing EP (2010) A latent variable model for geographic lexical variation. In: EMNLP, pp 1277–1287

    Google Scholar 

  7. He J, Chu WW, Liu ZV (2006) Inferring privacy information from social networks. In: ISI, pp 154–165

    Google Scholar 

  8. Ikeda K, Hattori G, Matsumoto K, Ono C, Higashino T (2012) Demographic estimation of twitter users for marketing analysis. IPSJ Trans Consum Devices Syst 2(1):82–93

    Google Scholar 

  9. Jansen BJ, Zhang M, Sobel K, Chowdury A (2009) Twitter power: tweets as electronic word of mouth. J Am Soc Inf Sci Technol 60(11):2169–2188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lindamood J, Heatherly R, Kantarcioglu M, Thuraisingham B (2009) Inferring private information using social network data. In: WWW, pp 1145–1146

    Google Scholar 

  11. Matsumoto K, Hashimoto K (1999) Schema design for causal law mining from incomplete database. In: DS, pp 92–102

    Google Scholar 

  12. Mislove A, Viswanath B, Gummadi KP, Druschel P (2010) You are who you know: inferring user profiles in online social networks. In: WSDM, pp 251–260

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mislove A, Lehmann S, Ahn YY, Onnela JP, Rosenquist JN (2011) Understanding the demographics of Twitter users. In: ICWSM

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pennacchiotti M, Popescu AM (2011) Democrats, republicans and starbucks afficionados: user classification in Twitter. In: KDD, pp 430–438

    Google Scholar 

  15. Rao D, Yarowsky D, Shreevats A, Gupta M (2010) Classifying latent user attributes in Twitter. In: SMUC, pp 37–44

    Google Scholar 

  16. Trusov M, Bucklin RE, Pauwels K (2009) Effects of word-of-mouth versus traditional marketing: findings from an internet social networking site. J Mark 73(5):90–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wen Z, Lin CY (2010) On the quality of inferring interests from social neighbors. In: KDD, pp 373–382

    Google Scholar 

  18. Wen Z, Lin CY (2011) Improving user interest inference from social neighbors. In: CIKM, pp 1001–1006

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zamal FA, Liu W, Ruths D (2012) Homophily and latent attribute inference: inferring latent attributes of Twitter users from neighbors. In: ICWSM

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zheleva E, Getoor L (2009) To join or not to join: the illusion of privacy in social networks with mixed public and private user profiles. In: WWW, pp 531–540

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jun Ito .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Ito, J., Nishida, K., Hoshide, T., Toda, H., Uchiyama, T. (2014). Demographic and Psychographic Estimation of Twitter Users Using Social Structures . In: Kawash, J. (eds) Online Social Media Analysis and Visualization. Lecture Notes in Social Networks. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13590-8_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13590-8_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13589-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13590-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics