Skip to main content

Artefact-Based Requirements Engineering Improvement: Learning to Walk in Practice

  • Conference paper
Product-Focused Software Process Improvement (PROFES 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 8892))

Abstract

Requirements engineering process improvement (REPI) has gained much attention in research and practice. Most REPI approaches are of solution-driven and activity-based nature. They focus on the assessment of company-specific RE reference models against an external norm of best practices, and they propagate an improvement by forecasting the adaptation of the processes and methods in the RE reference model towards that norm. In recent years, we could develop a first problem-driven RE improvement approach that supports an improvement against individual goals and problems of a company putting primary attention to the quality of the RE artefacts (named ArtREPI). In this short paper, we briefly illustrate our resulting approach and report on our initial experiences from ongoing empirical evaluations in practice. We conclude with a summary of planned next steps.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Méndez Fernández, D., Wagner, S.: Naming the Pain in Requirments Enginering: A Design for a global Family of Surveys and First Results from Germany. IST (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Pettersson, F., Ivarsson, M., Gorschek, T., Öhman, P.: A practitioner’s Guide to light weight Software Process Assessment and Improvement Planning. JSS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Beecham, S., Hall, T., Rainer, A.: Defining a requirements process improvement model. Software Quality Control 13 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Méndez Fernández, D., Ognawala, S., Wagner, S., Daneva, M.: Where Do We Stand in Requirements Engineerign Improvement Today? First Results from a Mapping Study. In: ESEM 2014 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Méndez Fernández, D., Mund, J., Femmer, H., Vetrò, A.: Quest for Requirements Engineering Oracles: Dependent Variables and Measurements for (good) RE. In: EASE (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Méndez Fernández, D., Wieringa, R.: Improving requirements engineering by artefact orientation. In: Heidrich, J., Oivo, M., Jedlitschka, A., Baldassarre, M.T. (eds.) PROFES 2013. LNCS, vol. 7983, pp. 108–122. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Méndez Fernández, D.: ArtREPI Online Resources (2014), http://www4.in.tum.de/~mendezfe/openspace.shtml

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Méndez Fernández, D. (2014). Artefact-Based Requirements Engineering Improvement: Learning to Walk in Practice. In: Jedlitschka, A., Kuvaja, P., Kuhrmann, M., Männistö, T., Münch, J., Raatikainen, M. (eds) Product-Focused Software Process Improvement. PROFES 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8892. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_27

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13835-0_27

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13834-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13835-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics