Skip to main content

Classifier-Based Multi-atlas Label Propagation with Test-Specific Atlas Weighting for Correspondence-Free Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Medical Computer Vision: Algorithms for Big Data (MCV 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8848))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

We propose a segmentation method which transfers the advantages of multi-atlas label propagation (MALP) to correspondence-free scenarios. MALP is a branch of segmentation approaches with attractive properties, which is currently applicable only in correspondence-based regimes such as brain labeling, which assume correspondence between atlases and test image. This precludes its use for the large class of tasks without this property, such as tumor segmentation. In this work, we propose a method which circumvents the correspondence assumption by using a classifier-based atlas representation in the spirit of the recently proposed Atlas Forests (AF). To counteract the negative effects of the over-training property of AF for applications with highly heterogeneous examples, we employ test-specific atlas weighting by the STAPLE approach. The main idea is that over-training ceases to be a problem if the prediction is based only on training atlases which are “similar” to the test image. Here, the “similarity” is based on the estimated ability of an atlas-based classifier to perform a correct labeling. We show a successful use of the proposed method for segmentation of brain tumors on data from the BraTS 2013 Challenge, which presents a correspondence-free scenario in which standard MALP cannot be expected to operate.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    In the context of STAPLE, ‘performance’ stands for ‘accuracy’, and we use the term in the same sense in this paper.

References

  1. Landman, B., Warfield, S. (eds.): MICCAI Workshop on Multi-Atlas Labeling (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Asman, A., Akhondi-Asl, A., Wang, H., Tustison, N., Avants, B., Warfield, S.K., Landman, B.: MICCAI 2013 segmentation algorithms, theory and applications (SATA) challenge results summary. In: MICCAI Challenge Workshop on Segmentation: Algorithms, Theory and Applications (SATA) (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wolz, R., Chu, C., Misawa, K., Mori, K., Rueckert, D.: Multi-organ abdominal CT segmentation using hierarchically weighted subject-specific atlases. In: Ayache, N., Delingette, H., Golland, P., Mori, K. (eds.) MICCAI 2012, Part I. LNCS, vol. 7510, pp. 10–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Menze, B., et al.: The Multimodal Brain Tumor Image Segmentation Benchmark (BRATS) (2014). http://hal.inria.fr/hal-00935640

  5. Aljabar, P., Heckemann, R., Hammers, A., Hajnal, J., Rueckert, D.: Multi-atlas based segmentation of brain images: atlas selection and its effect on accuracy. NeuroImage 46(3), 726–738 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Criminisi, A.: Atlas encoding by randomized forests for efficient label propagation. In: Mori, K., Sakuma, I., Sato, Y., Barillot, C., Navab, N. (eds.) MICCAI 2013, Part III. LNCS, vol. 8151, pp. 66–73. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  7. Akhondi-Asl, A., Warfield, S.: Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation through fusion of probabilistic segmentations. IEEE TMI 32, 1840–1852 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Rohlfing, T., Brandt, R., Menzel, R., Maurer, C.: Evaluation of atlas selection strategies for atlas-based image segmentation with application to confocal microscopy images of bee brains. NeuroImage 21(4), 1428–1442 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Heckemann, R., Hajnal, J., Aljabar, P., Rueckert, D., Hammers, A., et al.: Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion. NeuroImage 33(1), 115–126 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Rousseau, F., Habas, P., Studholme, C.: A supervised patch-based approach for human brain labeling. IEEE TMI 30(10), 1852–1862 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Coupé, P., Manjón, J., Fonov, V., Pruessner, J., Robles, M., Collins, D.: Patch-based segmentation using expert priors: application to hippocampus and ventricle segmentation. NeuroImage 54(2), 940–954 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Warfield, S., Zou, K., Wells, W.: Simultaneous truth and performance level estimation (STAPLE): an algorithm for the validation of image segmentation. IEEE TMI 23(7), 903–921 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Konukoglu, E., Shotton, J., Criminisi, A., Ye, D., Demiralp, C., Thomas, O.M., Das, T., Jena, R., Price, S.J.: Context-sensitive classification forests for segmentation of brain tumor tissues. In: MICCAI 2012 Challenge on Multimodal Brain Tumor Segmentation (BraTS) (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tustison, N., Gee, J.: N4ITK: Nick’s N3 ITK implementation for MRI bias field correction. Insight J. (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Darko Zikic .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Zikic, D., Glocker, B., Criminisi, A. (2014). Classifier-Based Multi-atlas Label Propagation with Test-Specific Atlas Weighting for Correspondence-Free Scenarios. In: Menze, B., et al. Medical Computer Vision: Algorithms for Big Data. MCV 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8848. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13972-2_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-13972-2_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-13971-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-13972-2

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics