Skip to main content

A Benchmarking Model for Sensors in Smart Environments

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8850))

Abstract

In smart environments, developers can choose from a large variety of sensors supporting their use case that have specific advantages or disadvantages. In this work we present a benchmarking model that allows estimating the utility of a sensor technology for a use case by calculating a single score, based on a weighting factor for applications and a set of sensor features. This set takes into account the complexity of smart environment systems that are comprised of multiple subsystems and applied in non-static environments. We show how the model can be used to find a suitable sensor for a use case and the inverse option to find suitable use cases for a given set of sensors. Additionally, extensions are presented that normalize differently rated systems and compensate for central tendency bias. The model is verified by estimating technology popularity using a frequency analysis of associated search terms in two scientific databases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Camp, R.C.: Benchmarking: the search for industry best practices that lead to superior performance. Quality Press, Milwaukee (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Lewis, B.C., Crews, A.E.: The evolution of benchmarking as a computer performance evaluation technique. MIS Q, 7–16 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Dongarra, J.J., Luszczek, P., Petitet, A.: The LINPACK benchmark: past, present and future. Concurr. Comput. Pract. Exp. 15, 803–820 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Weicker, R.P.: Dhrystone: A synthetic systems programming benchmark. Commun. ACM 27, 1013–1030 (1984)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Henning, J.L.: SPEC CPU2000: Measuring CPU performance in the new millennium. Computer (Long. Beach. Calif.) 33, 28–35 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Smith, J.E.: Characterizing computer performance with a single number. Commun. ACM 31, 1202–1206 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Crolotte, A.: Issues in Benchmark Metric Selection. In: Nambiar, R., Poess, M. (eds.) TPCTC 2009. LNCS, vol. 5895, pp. 146–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jain, R.: The art of computer systems performance analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Ranganathan, A., Al-Muhtadi, J., Biehl, J., Ziebart, B., Campbell, R.H., Bailey, B.: Towards a pervasive computing benchmark. In: Proceedings PerCom, pp. 194–198 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Barsocchi, P., Chessa, S., Furfari, F., Potorti, F.: Evaluating Ambient Assisted Living Solutions: The Localization Competition. IEEE Pervasive Comput. 12, 72–79 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Santos, R.M., de Oliveira, K.M., Andrade, R.M.C., Santos, I.S., Lima, E.R.: A Quality Model for Human-Computer Interaction Evaluation in Ubiquitous Systems. In: Collazos, C., Liborio, A., Rusu, C. (eds.) CLIHC 2013. LNCS, vol. 8278, pp. 63–70. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Jafari, S., Mtenzi, F., O’Driscoll, C., Fitzpatrick, R., O’Shea, B.: Measuring Privacy in Ubiquitous Computing Applications. Int. J. Digit. Soc. 2, 547–550 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wilson, J.S.: Sensor technology handbook. Elsevier (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Braun, A., Wichert, R., Kuijper, A., Fellner, D.W.: Capacitive proximity sensing in smart environments. J. Ambient Intell. Smart Environ. (in press)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleiss, J.L.: Measuring nominal scale agreement among many raters. Psychol. Bull. 76, 378 (1971)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Landsiedel, O., Wehrle, K., Götz, S.: Accurate prediction of power consumption in sensor networks. In: Proceedings Workshop on Embedded Networked Sensors (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Bertozzi, M., Broggi, A.: GOLD: A parallel real-time stereo vision system for generic obstacle and lane detection. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 7, 62–81 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Crawford, L.E., Huttenlocher, J., Engebretson, P.H.: Category effects on estimates of stimuli: Perception or reconstruction? Psychol. Sci. 11, 280–284 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andreas Braun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Braun, A., Wichert, R., Kuijper, A., Fellner, D.W. (2014). A Benchmarking Model for Sensors in Smart Environments. In: Aarts, E., et al. Ambient Intelligence. AmI 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8850. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14112-1_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14112-1_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14111-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14112-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics