Skip to main content

A Human Perception Based Performance Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics

  • Conference paper
Book cover Advances in Visual Computing (ISVC 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 8887))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Though numerous image quality measures have been proposed, the search for a reliable IQM is still vigorously pursued by different research groups around the world. There is a need to compare the already proposed IQMs with respect to their adherence to human image quality perception. A model that can accurately simulate the human perception of image quality is a challenging task due to limited human knowledge in the related domains of psychology, vision, biology etc. The psycho-visual experiments remain the most accurate way to model human perception of visual quality. In this paper, different state of the art full-reference objective image quality metrics (IQMs) are evaluated against human subjective judgments on standard LIVE image quality database. The difference mean opinion scores (DMOS) were calculated from 17400 human judgments on 348 images distorted with white noise, Gaussian blur and Rayleigh fast-fading distortions. Subsequently, 13 leading IQMs like SSIM, VIF, FSIM, etc. were compared with DMOS on the basis of Pearson correlation coefficient. It is observed that though there is not a single winner, VIF and IFC seem to have a higher performance compared to other quality metrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: Modern image quality assessment. Synthesis Lectures on Image, Video, and Multimedia Processing 2, 1–156 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Pedersen, M., Hardeberg, J.Y.: Full-reference image quality metrics: Classification and evaluation. Foundations and Trends® in Computer Graphics and Vision 7, 1–80 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Bovik, A.C.: Automatic prediction of perceptual image and video quality (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Wajid, R., Bin Mansoor, A., Pedersen, M.: A study of human perception similarity for image quality assessment. In: Colour and Visual Computing Symposium (CVCS), pp. 1–6. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Sheikh, H.R., Wang, Z., Cormack, L., Bovik, A.C.: Live image quality assessment database release 2 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Ponomarenko, N., Battisti, F., Egiazarian, K., Astola, J., Lukin, V.: Metrics performance comparison for color image database. In: Fourth International Workshop on Video Processing and Quality Metrics for Consumer Electronics, vol. 27 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang, L., Zhang, D., Mou, X.: Fsim: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 20, 2378–2386 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Recommendation, ITURBT: 500-11, Methodology for the Subjective Assessment of the Quality of Television Pictures, Recommendation ITU-R BT. 500-11. ITU Telecom. Standardization Sector of ITU (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Sheikh, H.R., Sabir, M.F., Bovik, A.C.: A statistical evaluation of recent full reference image quality assessment algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 3440–3451 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Huynh-Thu, Q., Ghanbari, M.: Scope of validity of psnr in image/video quality assessment. Electronics Letters 44, 800–801 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., Simoncelli, E.P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 13, 600–612 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Wang, Z., Simoncelli, E.P., Bovik, A.C.: Multiscale structural similarity for image quality assessment. In: Conference Record of the Thirty-Seventh Asilomar Conference on Signals, Systems and Computers, vol. 2, pp. 1398–1402. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C., De Veciana, G.: An information fidelity criterion for image quality assessment using natural scene statistics. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 14, 2117–2128 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sheikh, H.R., Bovik, A.C.: Image information and visual quality. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 15, 430–444 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C.: A universal image quality index. IEEE Signal Processing Letters 9, 81–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gaubatz, M., Hemami, S.: Metrix mux visual quality assessment package (2011), foulard.ece.cornell.edu/gaubatz/metrix_mux

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Wajid, R., Mansoor, A.B., Pedersen, M. (2014). A Human Perception Based Performance Evaluation of Image Quality Metrics. In: Bebis, G., et al. Advances in Visual Computing. ISVC 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8887. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14249-4_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14249-4_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14248-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14249-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics