Abstract
Textual entailment relations between concrete expressions and abstract concepts such as linguistic functions, attributes of entities and their values, emotions, moods, and situations, scenes, fields, occupations, etc can not be obtained with the help of syntactic transformation or dependency analysis. Usually, it is considered that to obtain these entailment relations common sense is needed, which makes the process of achieving these relations unpredictable. Lexical functions and scripts own the ability to conventionalize the common senses, which makes the recognition of these textual entailments predictable and derivable and thus improves corpus coverage in recognition of Chinese textual entailments.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Pazienza, M.T., Pennacchiotti, M., Zanzotto, F.M.: A linguistic inspection of textual entailment. In: Bandini, S., Manzoni, S. (eds.) AI*IA 2005. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3673, pp. 315–326. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
倪盛俭, 姬东鸿. 基于图式的文本蕴涵识别初探. 14届汉语词汇语义学国际会议论文集, 中国, 郑州 (2013). (Ni, S., Ji, D.: A Tentative Exploration into Recognition of Textual Entailments Based on Image Schemata. In: Chinese Lexical Semantics Workshop (CLSW-15), Zhengzhou, China (2013))
Mel’čuk, I.: Lexical Functions in Lexicographic Description. In: Proc. of the 8th Annual Meeting of Berkeley Linguistic Society (1982)
Mel’čuk, I.: Lexical functions: a tool for the description of lexical relations in a lexicon. Lexical Functions in Lexicography and Natural Language Processing 31, 37–102 (1996)
Minsky, M.: Frame-systems. AI. Memo. Mass. Institute of Technology, Cambridge (1974)
Schank, R.C.: Identification of conceptualizations underlying natural language. Computer Models of Thought and Language 187, 247 (1973)
Schank, R.: The structure of episodes in memory. In: Bobrow, D., Collins, T. (eds.) Representation and understanding: Studies in cognitive science. Academic, New York (1975)
Schank, R.C., Abelson, R.P.: Scripts, plans, and knowledge. Yale University (1975)
萧国政, 等. 从概念基元空间到语义基元空间的映射, 华东师范大学学报 (哲学和社会科学) (1), 139–143 (2011). (Xiao, G., et al.: Mapping from the Space of Conceptual Primitives to the Space of Semantic Primitives. Journal of East China Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences) (1), 139–143 (2011))
张 辉, 卢卫中. 认知转喻. 上海: 上海外语教育出版社 (2010). (Zhang, H., Lu, W.: Cognitive Metonymy. Shanghai Foreign Language Education Press, Shanghai (2010))
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Ni, S., Chen, Y., Ji, D. (2014). Conventionalizing Common Sense for Chinese Textual Entailment Recognition. In: Su, X., He, T. (eds) Chinese Lexical Semantics. CLSW 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8922. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14331-6_29
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-14331-6_29
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-14330-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-14331-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)