Skip to main content

How Can City Labs Enhance the Citizens’ Motivation in Different Types of Innovation Activities?

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Informatics (SocInfo 2014)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8852))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

There is a wide diversity of city labs for collaborative innovation. However, in all cases their success depends on motivating citizens to participate in their activities. This article builds on the literature on innovation dynamics in Living Labs to link them with other kinds of City Labs. The contribution of this article consists on building on the types of innovation mechanisms in Living Lab networks (Leminen, Westerlund, & Nyström, 2012; Leminen, 2013) by relating each type to a different theoretical innovation logic (methods for creativity; social innovation; open innovation; user innovation). Each logic is related to a different type of localized space of collective innovation (Fab Labs, co-creation spaces, Living Labs, coworking spaces and hackerspaces) and participants’ motivation to collaborate. The literature review on the main characteristics of each logic provide some guidelines for City Labs practitioners about how to motivate citizens.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Almirall, E., Wareham, J.: Living labs: arbiters of mid- and ground-level innovation. In: Oshri, I., Kotlarsky, J. (eds.) Global Sourcing of Information Technology and Business Processes. LNBIP, vol. 55, pp. 233–249. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Amabile, T.M.: Creativity in Context. Westview Press, Boulder (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bauwens, M.: P2P and Human Evolution: Peer to peer as the premise of a new mode of civilization. Ensaio, Rascunho, 1–73 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brown, J., Duguid, P.: The social life of information. Harvard Business Press (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Brown, T.: Design Thinking. Harvard Business Review 86(6), 84–92 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chesbrough, H.W.: Open business models: How to thrive in the new innovation landscape (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Farr, N.: hackerspaces | flux | Respect the Past, Examine the Present, Build the Future (2009). http://blog.hackerspaces.org/2009/08/25/respect-the-past-examine-the-present-build-the-future/. (Retrieved March 22, 2013)

  9. Gassmann, O., von Zedtwitz, M.: Trends and determinants of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management 33(3), 243–262 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gershenfeld, N.: Fab: The coming revolution on your desktop–from personal computers to personal fabrication. Basic Books (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grenzfurthner, J., Schneider, F.: Hacking the Spaces (2009). http://www.monochrom.at/hacking-the-spaces/. (Retrieved March 08, 2013)

  12. Haner, U.-E., Bakke, J.W.: On how work environments influence innovation – a case study from a large ICT company. In: Proceedings of the XV Annual Conference of the International Society for Professional Innovation Management (ISPIM), Oslo 20–24 June 2004

    Google Scholar 

  13. Himanen, P.: The hacker ethic. Random House Publishing Group (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kelley, T.: Prototyping is the shorthand of innovation. Design Management Journal (Former Series) 12(3), 35–42 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Laursen, K., Salter, A.: Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal 27, 131–150 (2006). doi:10.1002/smj.507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lave, J., Wenger, E.: Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Leminen, S.: Coordination and Participation in Living Lab Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 5–14, November 2013

    Google Scholar 

  18. Leminen, S., Westerlund, M., Nyström, A.: Living Labs as Open-Innovation Networks. Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 6–11, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  19. Leonard, D., Swap, W.: When Sparks Fly: Igniting Creativity in Groups. Harvard Business School Press, Boston (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Levy, S.: Hackers: Heroes of the computer revolution. Penguin Books, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Maxigas: Hacklabs and hackerspaces – tracing two genealogies. Journal of Peer Production 2, 1–10 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Moilanen, J.: Emerging hackerspaces – peer-production generation. In: Hammouda, I., Lundell, B., Mikkonen, T., Scacchi, W. (eds.) Open Source Systems: Long-Term Sustainability. IFIP AICT, vol. 378, pp. 94–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R., Sanders, B.: Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated. Skoll Centre for Social Entrepreneurship, Ox (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Schlesinger, J., Islam, M.M., MacNeill, K.: Founding a Hackerspace. wpi.edu (p. 69). Worcester (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Shah, S.: Open beyond software. SSRN 789805 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Von Hippel, E.: “Sticky information” and the locus of problem solving: implications for innovation. Management Science 40(4), 429–439 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Von Hippel, E.: Democratizing innovation. MIT press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Von Hippel, E.: The sources of innovation (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice : Learning as a Social System, pp. 1–10, June 1998

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wenger, E.: Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  31. Westerlund, M., Leminen, S.: Managing the challenges of becoming an open innovation company: experiences from Living Labs. Technology Innovation Management Review, pp. 19–25, October (2011)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ignasi Capdevila .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Capdevila, I. (2015). How Can City Labs Enhance the Citizens’ Motivation in Different Types of Innovation Activities?. In: Aiello, L., McFarland, D. (eds) Social Informatics. SocInfo 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8852. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15168-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15167-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15168-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics