Abstract
There is increasing evidence that IPv6 deployment is maturing as a response to the exhaustion of unallocated IPv4 address blocks, leading to gradual convergence of the IPv4 and IPv6 topologies in terms of structure and routing paths. However, the lack of a fully-connected transit-free clique in IPv6, as well as a different economic evolution than IPv4, implies that existing IPv4 AS relationship algorithms will not accurately infer relationships between autonomous systems in IPv6, encumbering our ability to model and understand IPv6 AS topology evolution. We modify CAIDA’s IPv4 relationship inference algorithm to accurately infer IPv6 relationships using publicly available BGP data. We validate 24.9 % of our 41,589 c2p and p2p inferences for July 2014 to have a 99.3 % and 94.5 % PPV, respectively. Using these inferred relationships, we analyze the BGP-observed IPv4 and IPv6 AS topologies, and find that ASes are converging toward the same relationship types in IPv4 and IPv6, but disparities remain due to differences in the transit-free clique and the influence of Hurricane Electric in IPv6.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Hurricane electric IPv6 tunnel broker. https://tunnelbroker.net/
PeeringDB. http://www.peeringdb.com
RIPE Routing Information Service (RIS). http://www.ripe.net/ris
Route Views. http://www.routeviews.org/
Blunk, Y., Damas, J., Parent, F., Robachevsky, A.: Routing policy specification language next generation (RPSLng). RFC 4012, March 2005
Chandra, R., Traina, P., Li, T.: BGP communities attribute. RFC 1997. August 1996
Colitti, L., Gunderson, S.H., Kline, E., Refice, T.: Evaluating IPv6 adoption in the internet. In: Krishnamurthy, A., Plattner, B. (eds.) PAM 2010. LNCS, vol. 6032, pp. 141–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Czyz, J., Allman, M., Zhang, J., Iekel-Johnson, S., Osterweil, E., Bailey, M.: Measuring IPv6 adoption. In: SIGCOMM, pp. 87–98 (2014)
Dhamdhere, A., Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., claffy, k., Elmokashfi, A., Aben, E.: Measuring the deployment of IPv6: topology, routing and performance. In: IMC, pp. 537–550 (2012)
Gao, L.: On inferring autonomous system relationships in the Internet. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 9(6), 733–745 (2001)
Gill, P., Schapira, M., Goldberg, S.: A survey of interdomain routing policies. CCR 44(1), 28–34 (2013)
Giotsas, V., Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., claffy, k.: Inferring complex AS relationships. In: IMC, November 2014
Giotsas, V., Zhou, S.: Detecting and assessing the hybrid IPv4/IPv6 AS relationships. In: SIGCOMM Poster, pp. 424–425 (2011)
Giotsas, V., Zhou, S.: Valley-free violation in Internet routing - analysis based on BGP community data. In: IEEE ICC 2012 CQRM, pp. 1208–1212, June 2012
Internet Archive: Wayback Machine. http://archive.org/web/
Karpilovsky, E., Gerber, A., Pei, D., Rexford, J., Shaikh, A.: Quantifying the extent of IPv6 deployment. In: Moon, S.B., Teixeira, R., Uhlig, S. (eds.) PAM 2009. LNCS, vol. 5448, pp. 13–22. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Leber, M.: IPv6 internet broken, cogent/telia/hurricane not peering, NANOG. http://mailman.nanog.org/pipermail/nanog/2009-October/014017.html
Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., claffy, K., Dhamdhere, A., Giotsas, V.: AS relationships, customer cones, and validation. In: IMC 2013, pp. 243–256 (2013)
Norton, W.: Restrictive peering policy. DrPeering International. http://drpeering.net/FAQ/What-is-a-restrictive-peer.html
Oliveira, R., Pei, D., Willinger, W., Zhang, B., Zhang, L.: The (in)completeness of the observed Internet AS-level structure. IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 18(1), 109–122 (2010)
UCLA: Internet AS-level topology archive. http://irl.cs.ucla.edu/topology
Zmijewski, E.: A Bakers Dozen, 2013 Edition. Renesys Blog. http://www.renesys.com/2014/01/bakers-dozen-2013-edition/
Zmijewski, E.: World IPv6 Day. Renesys Blog. http://www.renesys.com/2011/06/world-ipv6-day/
Acknowledgements
The work was supported by U.S. NSF grant CNS-1111449, DHS S&T Cyber Security Division (DHS S&T/CSD) BAA 11-02 and SPAWAR Systems Center Pacific via contract number N66001-12-C-0130, and by DRDC pursuant to an Agreement between the U.S. and Canadian governments for Cooperation in Science and Technology for Critical Infrastructure Protection and Border Security. The work represents the position of the authors and not of NSF, DHS, or DRDC.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Giotsas, V., Luckie, M., Huffaker, B., Claffy, K. (2015). IPv6 AS Relationships, Cliques, and Congruence. In: Mirkovic, J., Liu, Y. (eds) Passive and Active Measurement. PAM 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8995. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15509-8_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15508-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15509-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)