Skip to main content

Guideline Identification for Optimization Under Uncertainty Through the Optimization of a Boomerang Trajectory

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization (EMO 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNTCS,volume 9019))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 3184 Accesses

Abstract

Optimization under uncertainty (OUU) is a very important task for practitioners of engineering design optimization. In fact real–world problems are often affected by uncertainties of different kind. The search for robust optimal solutions is intrinsically multiobjective, being formulated as the search for the optimal performance while minimizing its variance. Thus, OUU should garner interest in the evolutionary multiobjective optimization community. It is a challenging topic, because, for instance, engineers have to deal with large scale or highly–constrained problems. The first issue affects the feasibility of the optimization itself, whereas the second affects the reliability of an optimal solution. In this paper, we address the OUU problem to validate a number of best practices through the application to a benchmark problem: the optimization of a boomerang launch parameters. To reduce the computational cost, we consider variable screening as a preliminary step before performing a stochastic optimization. For the latter we use a method recently proposed by the authors, which combines robustness and reliability assessments within a single optimization run.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Branke, J.: Creating robust solutions by means of evolutionary algorithms. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN 1998. LNCS, vol. 1498, pp. 119–128. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Deb, K., Gupta, H.: Introducing robustness in multi–objective optimization. Evolutionary Computation 14, 463–494 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Deb, K., Padmanabhan, D., Gupta, S., Mall, A.K.: Reliability–based multi-objective optimization using evolutionary algorithms. In: Obayashi, S., Deb, K., Poloni, C., Hiroyasu, T., Murata, T. (eds.) EMO 2007. LNCS, vol. 4403, pp. 66–80. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Daum, D.A., Deb, K., Branke, J.: Reliability–based optimization for multiple constraints with evolutionary algorithms. In: 2007 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation (CEC 2007), pp. 911–918 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Deb, K., Gupta, S., Daum, D., Branke, J., Mall, A.K., Padmanabhan, D.: Reliability–Based Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 13, 1054–1074 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Schuëller, G.I., Jensen, H.A.: Computational Methods in Optimization considering Uncertainties – An Overview. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 198, 2–13 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Beyer, H.-G., Sendhoff, B.: Robust Optimization – A comprehensive Survey. Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Engrg. 196(33–34), 3190–3218 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Jin, Y., Branke, J.: Evolutionary Optimization in Uncertain Environments – A Survey. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 9(3), 1–15 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barrico, C., Antunes, C.H.: An Evolutionary Approach for Assessing the Degree of Robustness of Solutions to Multi–Objective Models. Evolutionary Computation in Dynamic and Uncertain Environments Studies in Computational Intelligence 51, 565–582 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Russo, R., Clarich A., Nobile, E., Poloni, C.: Optimization of a boomerang shape using modeFRONTIER. In: 14th AIAA/ISSMO Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization Conference, September 2012

    Google Scholar 

  11. Clarich, A., Russo, R., Marchi, M., Rigoni, E.: Reliability–based design optimization applying polynomial chaos expansion: theory and applications. In: 10th World Congress on Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, Orlando, Florida, USA, pp. 19–24, May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  12. Marchi, M., Rigoni, E., Russo, R., Clarich, A.: Percentile via polynomial chaos expansion: bridging robust optimization and reliability. In: International Conference on EVOLVE 2013, A Bridge Between Probability, Set Oriented Numerics, and Evolutionary Computation, Extended Abstract Proceedings, July 10-13, Leiden, NL (2013). ISBN 978-2-87971-118-8, ISSN 2222-9434

    Google Scholar 

  13. Marchi, M., Rizzian, L., Rigoni, E., Russo, R., Clarich, A.: Combining robustness and reliability with polynomial chaos techniques in multiobjective optimization problems: use of percentiles. In: Cunha, A., Caetano, E., Ribeiro, P., Muller, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Structural Dynamics, EURODYN 2014, Porto, Portugal, June 30–July 2 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  14. www.esteco.com

  15. McKay, M.D., Conover, W.J., Beckman, R.J.: A Comparison of Three Methods for Selecting Values of Input Variables in the Analysis of Output from a Computer Code. Technometrics 21(2), 239–245 (1979)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Wiener, N.: The homogeneous chaos. Amer. J. Math. 60, 897–936 (1938)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. Xiu, D., Karniadakis, G.E.: The Wiener–Askey polynomial chaos for stochastic differential equations. SIAM J. Sci. Comput. 24, 619–644 (2002)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Gu, C.: Smoothing Spline ANOVA Models. Springer, New York (2002)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Wahba, G.: Spline Models for Observational Data. SIAM, Philadelphia (1990)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. http://www.mathworks.it/products/matlab/

  21. Deb, K., Pratap, A., Agarwal, S., Meyarivan, T.: A fast and elitist multiobjective genetic algorithm: NSGA–II. IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation 6, 182–197 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mariapia Marchi .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Marchi, M., Rigoni, E., Russo, R., Clarich, A. (2015). Guideline Identification for Optimization Under Uncertainty Through the Optimization of a Boomerang Trajectory. In: Gaspar-Cunha, A., Henggeler Antunes, C., Coello, C. (eds) Evolutionary Multi-Criterion Optimization. EMO 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9019. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15892-1_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-15891-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-15892-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics