Abstract
Recent research has indicated that social networking sites are being adopted as venues for online information-seeking. In order to understand questioner’s intention in social Q&A environments and to better facilitate such behaviors, we define two types of questions: subjective information-seeking questions and objective information seeking ones. To enable automatic detection on question subjectivity, we propose a predictive model that can accurately distinguish between the two classes of questions. By applying the classifier on a larger dataset, we present a comprehensive analysis to compare questions with subjective and objective orientations, in terms of their length, response speed, as well as the characteristics of their respondents. We find that the two types of questions exhibited very different characteristics. Also, we noticed that question subjectivity plays a significant role in attracting responses from strangers. Our results validate the expected benefits of differentiating questions according to their subjectivity orientations, and provide valuable insights for future design and development of tools that can assist the information seeking process under social context.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Morris, M.R., Teevan, J., Panovich, K.: What do people ask their social networks, and why?: A survey study of status message Q & A behavior. In: SIGCHI (2010)
Lampe, C., et al.: Help is on the way: patterns of responses to resource requests on facebook. In: CSCW (2014)
Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Almighty twitter, what are people asking for? In: ASIS & T (2012)
Jansen, B.J., et al.: Twitter Power: Tweets as Electronic Word of Mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 60(11), 2169–2188 (2009)
Zhao, Z., Mei, Q.: Questions about questions: An empirical analysis of information needs on twitter. In: WWW (2013)
Harper, F.M., Moy, D., Konstan, J.A.: Facts or friends?: distinguishing informational and conversational questions in social Q & A sites. In: SIGCHI (2009)
Li, B., et al.: Exploring question subjectivity prediction in community QA. In: SIGIR (2008)
Zhou, T.C., Si, X., Chang, Y.E., King, I., Lyu, M.R.: A data-driven approach to question subjectivity identification in community question answering. In: AAAI (2012)
Chen, L., Zhang, D., Mark, L.: Understanding user intent in community question answering. In: WWW (2012)
Aikawa, N., Sakai, T., Yamana, H.: Community qa question classification: Is the asker looking for subjective answers or not. IPSJ Online Transactions 4, 160–168 (2011)
Li, B., et al.: Question identification on twitter. In: CIKM (2011)
Porter, M.F.: An Algorithm for Suffix Stripping. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems 14(3), 130–137 (1980)
Toutanova, K., et al.: Feature-rich part-of-speech tagging with a cyclic dependency network. In: NAACL2013-Volume 1
Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J.: Factors influencing the response rate in social question and answering behavior. In: CSCW (2013)
Pal, A., Margatan, J., Konstan, J.: Question temporality: identification and uses. In: CSCW (2012)
Paul, S.A., Hong, L., Chi, E.H.: Is twitter a good place for asking questions? a characterization study. In: ICWSM (2011)
Zhang, P.: Information seeking through microblog questions: The impact of social capital and relationships. In: ASIS & T (2012)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Liu, Z., Jansen, B.J. (2015). Subjective versus Objective Questions: Perception of Question Subjectivity in Social Q&A. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. SBP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16267-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16268-3
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)