Skip to main content

Are Tweets Biased by Audience? An Analysis from the View of Topic Diversity

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction (SBP 2015)

Abstract

The emergence of blogs, and especially microblogs, has granted users the possibility of publishing and sharing ideas, news, opinions and any other kind of content with their audience. But this has also brought them the arduous tasks of self-censorship and adaptation of the content to an audience previously envisioned in order to keep, and even increase, their social influence. Taking into account the impossibility of knowing this imagined audience and using Twitter as a case study, we analyse if the diversity of topics chosen by users in their tweets is biased by the size of their audience. Considering the number of followers as the users’ audience and applying a methodology based on clustering the representative terms in tweets, we found that individuals with large audiences tend to deal with topics more diverse than those with small audiences. Understanding how audience size affects the range of topics chosen by a speaker have theoretical implications for sociological studies and even for the effective design of marketing campaigns.

Work funded by the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (EEBB-I-13-06425 and TEC2013-47665-C4-3-R); the European Regional Development Fund and the Galician Regional Government under agreement for funding the AtlantTIC Research Center; and the Spanish Government and the European Regional Development Fund under project TACTICA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Blei, D.M., Ng, A.Y., Jordan, M.I.: Latent dirichlet allocation. The Journal of Machine Learning Research 3, 993–1022 (2003)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Cilibrasi, R.L., Vitanyi, P.M.B.: The google similarity distance. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering 19(3), 370–383 (2007). http://nlp.stanford.edu/software/corenlp.shtml (last accessed on December 11, 2014)

  3. Dimitrov, A., Olteanu, A., Mcdowell, L., Aberer, K.: Topick: accurate topic distillation for user streams. In: IEEE 12th International Conference on Data Mining Workshops (ICDMW), pp. 882–885 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Goffman, E.: The presentation of self in everyday life (1959)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Jain, A.K., Dubes, R.C.: Algorithms for clustering data. Prentice-Hall, Inc. (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kwak, H., Lee, C., Park, H., Moon, S.: What is twitter, a social network or a news media? In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on World Wide Web, WWW 2010, pp. 591–600 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Langfelder, P., Zhang, B., Horvath, S.: Defining clusters from a hierarchical cluster tree: the Dynamic Tree Cut package for R. Bioinformatics 24(5), 719–720 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Li, R., Wang, S., Deng, H., Wang, R., Chang, K.C.C.: Towards social user profiling: unified and discriminative influence model for inferring home locations. In: KDD, pp. 1023–1031 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Marwick, A.E., et al.: I tweet honestly, I tweet passionately: Twitter users, context collapse, and the imagined audience. New Media & Society 13(1), 114–133 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ong, W.J.: The writer’s audience is always a fiction. Publications of the Modern Language Association of America, pp. 9–21 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Quercia, D., Askham, H., Crowcroft, J.: Tweetlda: supervised topic classification and link prediction in twitter. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Annual ACM Web Science Conference, WebSci 2012 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Rangrej, A., Kulkarni, S., Tendulkar, A.V.: Comparative study of clustering techniques for short text documents. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference Companion on World Wide Web, WWW 2011, pp. 111–112 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Rousseeuw, P.J.: Silhouettes: a graphical aid to the interpretation and validation of cluster analysis. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 20, 53–65 (1987)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Servia-Rodríguez, S., Fernández-Vilas, A., Díaz-Redondo, R., Pazos-Arias, J.: Inferring contexts from Facebook interactions: A social publicity scenario. IEEE Transactions on Multimedia 15(6), 1296–1303 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Servia-Rodríguez, S., Fernández-Vilas, A., Díaz-Redondo, R.P., Pazos-Arias, J.J.: Comparing tag clustering algorithms for mining twitter users’ interests. In: International Conference on Social Computing (SocialCom), pp. 679–684. IEEE (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Witten, I., Milne, D.: An effective, low-cost measure of semantic relatedness obtained from wikipedia links. In: Proceeding of AAAI Workshop on Wikipedia and Artificial Intelligence: an Evolving Synergy, pp. 25–30 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sandra Servia-Rodríguez .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Servia-Rodríguez, S., Díaz-Redondo, R.P., Fernández-Vilas, A. (2015). Are Tweets Biased by Audience? An Analysis from the View of Topic Diversity. In: Agarwal, N., Xu, K., Osgood, N. (eds) Social Computing, Behavioral-Cultural Modeling, and Prediction. SBP 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9021. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16268-3_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16267-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16268-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics