Skip to main content

Multi Criteria Decision Support System: Preference Information and Robustness

  • Conference paper
New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 353))

  • 4096 Accesses

Abstract

The robustness analysis is a substantial and debatable issue in the multi-criteria decision support systems. The multi-criteria decision support systems always depend on preference information from a decision maker. Although it is evident that elicited preference information has a great impact on the result, research on the preference robustness in multi-criteria decision support system rather narrow in contrast to the well-established research robust decision making. This paper focuses on the multi-criteria decision support systems based on the multiple criteria sorting methods. The paper proposes an analyzing approach based on the concept of the preference robustness. The approach involved in the multi-criteria decision support system can provide valuable insight to a decision maker on how preferences influence the choice among alternatives. Moreover, the approach can be combined with other decision aiding methods as an additional technique for deriving a consensus when there are multiple preferences.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 369.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. French, S., Xu, D.-L.: Comparison study of multi-attribute decision analytics software. Journal of Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis 13, 65–80 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Weistroffer, H., Smith, C., Narula, S.: Multiple criteria decision support software. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis. State of the Art Surveys Series, pp. 989–1018. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Bell, D.E., Raiffa, H., Tversky, A.: Decision Making: Descriptive, Normative, and Prescriptive Interactions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1988)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. French, S., Rios Insua, D.: Statistical Decision Theory. Edward Arnold, London (2000)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Keeney, R.: On the foundations of prescriptive decision analysis. In: Edwards, W. (ed.) Utility Theories: Measurements and Applications, pp. 57–72. Kluwer Academic, Boston (1992)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Alter, S.: A Taxonomy of Decision Support Systems. Sloan Management Review 19(1), 39–56 (1977)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lewis, P.J.: The decision making basis for information systems: the contribution of Vickers’ concept of appreciation to a ’soft’ systems perspective. European Journal of Information Systems 1(1), 33–43 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. French, S., Maule, J., Papamichail, N.: Decision behaviour, analysis and support. Cambridge University Press, United Kingdom (2009)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Dyer, J.S.: Multi attribute utility theory. In: Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis: State of the Art Surveys, pp. 265–295. Springer, New York (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mustajoki, J., Marttunen, M.: Comparison of Multi-Criteria Decision Analytical Software. Finnish Environment Institute (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: The Robustness Concern in Preference Disaggregation Approaches for Decision Aiding: An Overview. In: Optimization in Science and Engineering, pp. 157–177. Springer, New York (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Dias, L.C., Mousseau, V.: IRIS: A DSS for Multiple Criteria Sorting Problems. J. Multi-Crit. Decis. Anal. 12, 285–298 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Vetschera, R., Chen, Y., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: Robustness and information levels in case-based multiple criteria sorting. European Journal of Operational Research 202(3), 841–852 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Doumpos, M., Zopounidis, C.: A multicriteria decision support system for bank rating. Decision Support Systems 50, 55–63 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Homans, G.: Social Behaviour: Its Elementary Forms. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1961)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Simon, H.A.: Rational Decision Making in Business Organizations. The American Economic Review 69(4), 493–513 (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tversky, A., Simonson, I.: Context-Dependent Preferences. Management Science 39(10), 1179–1189 (1993)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. David, P.A.: Clio and the economics of QWERTY. The American Economic Review 75(2), 332–337 (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 106(4), 1039–1061 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Koch, J., Eisend, M., Petermann, A.: Path Dependence in Decision-Making Processes: Exploring the Impact of Complexity under Increasing Returns. BuR Business Research Journal 2(1), 67–84 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Gupta, S., Rosenhead, J.: Robustness in sequential investment decisions. Management Science 15, 18–29 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Roy, B.: Robustness in operational research and decision aiding: A multi-faced issue. European Journal of Operational Research 200, 629–638 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Greco, S., Słowínski, R., Figueira, J.R., Mousseau, V.: Robust Ordinal Regression. In: Trends in Multiple Criteria Decision Analysis, pp. 241–283. Springer, US (2010)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Fu, C., Chin, K.-S.: Robust evidential reasoning approach with unknown attribute weights. Knowledge-Based Systems 59, 9–20 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ishizaka, A., Pearman, C., Nemery, P.: AHPSort: an AHP-based method for sorting problems. International Journal of Production Research 50(17), 4767–4784 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Roy, B., Słowiński, R.: Questions guiding the choice of a multicriteria decision aiding method. EURO J Decis Process 1, 69–97 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mousseau, V., Słowiński, R., Zielniewicz, P.: A user-oriented implementation of the ELECTRE-TRI method integrating preference elicitation support. Computers & Operations Research 27(7-8), 757–777 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Jacquet-Lagreze, E., Siskos, J.: Assessing a set of additive utility functions for multicriteria decision-making, the UTA method. European Journal of Operational Research 10(2), 151–164 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Nemery, P., Lamboray, C.: lowSort: a flow-based sorting method with limiting or central profiles. Top 16(1), 90–113 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Chen, Y., Li, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W.: A case-based distance model for multiple criteria ABC analysis. Computers & Operations Research 35(3), 776–796 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Chen, Y., Kilgour, D.M., Hipel, K.W.: A case-based distance method for screening in multiple-criteria decision aid. Omega 36(3), 373–383 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  32. Keeney, R., Raiffa, H.: Decisions with Multiple Objectives: Preferences and Value Tradeoffs. Wiley, New York (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Kalinina .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Kalinina, M. (2015). Multi Criteria Decision Support System: Preference Information and Robustness. In: Rocha, A., Correia, A., Costanzo, S., Reis, L. (eds) New Contributions in Information Systems and Technologies. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 353. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_63

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16486-1_63

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16485-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16486-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics