Skip to main content

Cataloguing Physicality Values Using Physical Quantitative Evaluation Method

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability (OzCHI 2013)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 8433))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 839 Accesses

Abstract

Physical interfaces suffer from interaction complexities leading to usage difficulty and poor acceptance by the end-users. Usability techniques focus on the overall usability issues while overlooking the in-depth physicality aspects of the interface and interaction. This study proposes a physicality-focused quantitative evaluation method (PQEM) to assist embedded system developers in managing the interaction complexities of their products. The acceptance of the embedded system developers towards the proposed method was assessed by means of a user study. The results suggested their strong acceptance. By using this method, we further propose a range of values for appliances, which can be treated as a catalogue or as guidelines as they design and develop physical interfaces. A second user study was conducted to assess the acceptance of embedded system developers for the proposed catalogue. In this study, spatial cognition is concerned in assisting and facilitating the designers and developers in designing physical interfaces of embedded products. We used intensive interviewing as the cognitive method to assess the influence of the catalogue of values from PQEM on performance in designing and developing physical interfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wechsung, I.: What to evaluate? a taxonomy of quality aspects of multimodal interfaces. In: Mukhopadhyay, S.C. (ed.) An Evaluation Framework for Multimodal Interaction T-Labs Series in Telecommunication Services 2014, pp. 23–46. Springer International Publishing, Switzerland (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Norman, D.: The way I see it: looking back, looking forward. Interactions 17(6), 61–63 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim, J., Han, S.H.: A methodology for developing a usability index of consumer electronic products. Int. J. Ind. Ergon. 38(3), 333–345 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Antle, A.N., Wang, S.: Comparing motor-cognitive strategies for spatial problem solving with tangible and multi-touch interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction(TEI 2013), pp. 65–72. ACM, New York (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Antle, A.N., Corness, G., Droumeva, M.: What the body knows: exploring the benefits of embodied metaphors in hybrid physical digital environments. Interact. Comput. 21(1–2), 66–75 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ghazali, M.: Discovering Natural Interaction of Physical Qualities to Design Fluid Interaction for Novel Devices. Research Monograph, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Malaysia (2007). ISBN 978-967-353-691-7

    Google Scholar 

  7. Choi, H., van Merriënboer, J.J.G., Paas, F.: Effects of the physical environment on cognitive load and learning: towards a new model of cognitive load. Edu. Psychol. Rev. 26(1), 225–244 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nathan, M.J.: An embodied cognition perspective on symbols, gesture and grounding instruction and embodiment. Debates on Meaning and Cognition, Vol. 18, pp. 375–396. Oxford, UK (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Wilson, M.: Six views of embodied cognition. Psychon. Bull. Rev. 9(4), 625–636 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lozano, S.C., Hard, B.M., Tversky, B.: Putting action in perspective. Cognition 103(3), 480–490 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Clifton, P.: Designing embodied interfaces to support spatial ability. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Tangible, Embedded and Embodied Interaction (TEI 2014), pp. 309–312. ACM, New York (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dix, A., Ghazali, M., Ramduny-Ellis, D.: Modelling devices for natural interaction. Electron. Notes Theoret. Comput. Sci. 208, 23–40 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ghazali, M., Dix, A.: The role of inverse actions in everyday physical interactions. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Workshop for Physicality, pp. 21–26 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hare, Joanna., Gill, S., Loudon, G., Ramduny-Ellis, D., Dix, A.: Physical fidelity: exploring the importance of physicality on physical-digital conceptual prototyping. In: Gross, T., Gulliksen, J., Kotzé, P., Oestreicher, L., Palanque, P., Prates, R.O., Winckler, M. (eds.) INTERACT 2009. LNCS, vol. 5726, pp. 217–230. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Norman, D.: The next UI breakthrough, part 2: Physicality. Interaction vol. 14, pp. 46–47. ACM, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dix, A., Ghazali, M., Gill, S., Hare, J., Ramduny-Ellis, D.: Physigrams: modelling devices for natural interaction. Formal Aspect Comput. 21, 613–641 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Ashraf, Mahmood, Ghazali, Masitah: Towards Natural Interaction with Wheelchair Using Nintendo Wiimote Controller. In: Zain, Jasni Mohamad, Wan Mohd, Wan Maseri bt, El-Qawasmeh, Eyas (eds.) ICSECS 2011, Part III. CCIS, vol. 181, pp. 231–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Ashraf, M., Ghazali, M.: Augmenting intuitiveness with wheelchair interface using Nintendo wiimote. Int. J. New Comput. Archit. Appl. 1, 1000–1013 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Ashraf, M., Ghazali, M.: Interface design for wheelchair using Nintendo Wiimote controller. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference On User Science And Engineering: Beyond Usability (i-USEr2011), pp. 54–59. IEEE. Malaysia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Ashraf, M., Ghazali, M.: Investigating physical interaction complexities in embedded systems. In: Proceedings of the 5th Malaysian Software Engineering Conference (MySEC2011), pp. 214–219. IEEE. Malaysia (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gulliksen, J.: How do developers meet users?—attitudes and processes in software development. In: Doherty, G., Blandford, A. (eds.) DSVIS 2006. LNCS, vol. 4323, pp. 1–10. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Biel, B., Grill, T., Gruhn, V.: Exploring the benefits of the combination of a software architecture analysis and a usability evaluation of a mobile application. J. Syst. Soft. 83, 2031–2044 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferre, X., Medinilla, N.: How a human-centered approach impacts software development. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4550, pp. 68–77. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Folmer, E., Welie, M., Bosch, J.: Bridging patterns: an approach to bridge gaps between SE and HCI. Inform. Soft. Technol. 48, 69–89 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Hussein, I., Mahmud, M., Yeo, A.W.: HCI practices in Malaysia: a reflection of ICT professionals’ perspective. In: Proceeding of the International Symposium in Information Technology (ITSim 2010), pp. 1549–1554. IEEE Computer Society, Kuala Lumpur (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Joshi, A., Sarda, N.L., Tripathi, S.: Measuring effectiveness of HCI integration in software development processes. J. Syst. Softw. 83, 2045–2058 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Juristo, N., Ferre, X.: How to integrate usability into the software development process. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2006), pp. 1079–1080. ACM, Shanghai (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Majid, R.A., Noor, N.L., Adnan, W., Mansor, S.: Users’ frustration and HCI in the software development life cycle. Int. J. Inf. Process Manag. 2, 43–48 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Memmel, T., Gundelsweiler, F., Reiterer, H.: CRUISER: a cross-discipline user interface and software engineering lifecycle. In: Jacko, J.A. (ed.) HCI 2007. LNCS, vol. 4550, pp. 174–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Moundalexis, M., Deery, J., Roberts, Kendal.: Integrating human-computer interaction artifacts into system development. In: Kurosu, Masaaki. (ed.) HCD 2009. LNCS, vol. 5619, pp. 284–291. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Nunes, N.J.: What drives software development: bridging the gap between software and usability engineering. In: Ahmed, S., Jean, V., Desmarais, M.C. (eds.) Human-Centered Software Engineering, Human-Computer Interaction Series, pp. 9–25. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Vukelja, L., Müller, L., Opwis, K.: Are engineers condemned to design? a survey on software engineering and UI design in Switzerland. In: Baranauskas, Cécilia., Abascal, Julio., Barbosa, S.D.J. (eds.) INTERACT 2007. LNCS, vol. 4663, pp. 555–568. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  33. Sheridan, J.G., Short, B.W., Van Laerhoven, K.,Villar, N., Kortuem, G.: Exploring cube affordance: towards a classification of non-verbal dynamics of physical interfaces for wearable computing, In: Proceeding of Eurowearable 2003, pp. 113–118. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Harnad, S.: To cognize is to categorize: cognition is categorization. In: Lefebvre, C., Cohen, H. (eds.) Handbook on Categorization. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Meier, A., Aragon, C., Hurwitz, B., Mujumdar, D., Peffer, T., Perry, D., Pritoni, M.: How people use thermostats in homes: a review. Build. Environ. 46, 2529–2541 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Carvalho, R., Soares, M.: Ergonomic and usability analysis on a sample of automobile dashboards. Work: A J. Prev. Assess. Rehabil. 41, 1507–1514 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Blackler, A., Mahar, D., Popovic, V.: Older adults, interface experience and cognitive decline. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI 2010), pp. 172–175 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Blackler, A., Popovic, V., Mahar, D.: Investigating users’ intuitive interaction with complex artefacts. Appl. Ergon. 41, 72–92 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lawry, S., Popovic, V., Blackler, A.L.: Identifying familiarity in older and younger adults. In: Proceedings of Design Research Society International Conference 2010: Design and Complexity. School of Industrial Design, Université de Montréal, Montréal (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Reddy, G.R., Blackler, A., Mahar, D., Vesna, P.: The effects of cognitive ageing on use of complex interfaces. In: Proceedings of the 22nd Conference of the Computer-Human Interaction Special Interest Group of Australia on Computer-Human Interaction (OZCHI 2010), pp. 180–183 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Biswas, P., Langdon, P.: Standardizing user models. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6766, pp. 3–11. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  42. Langdon, P., Clarkson, J., Robinson, P.: Designing inclusive futures. Univers. Access Inf. Soc. 9, 191–193 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Persad, U., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J.: Investigating the relationships between user capabilities and product demands for older and disabled users. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part I, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6765, pp. 110–118. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Wilkinson, C., Langdon, P., Clarkson, P.J.: Evaluating the design, use and learnability of household products for older individuals. In: Stephanidis, C. (ed.) Universal Access in HCI, Part II, HCII 2011. LNCS, vol. 6766, pp. 250–259. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Smith, S.L., Mosier, J.N.: Guidelines for designing user interface software. http://hcibib.org/sam/

  46. W3C.: Checklist of checkpoints for web content accessibility guidelines 1.0. http://www.w3.org/TR/WAI-WEBCONTENT/full-checklist

  47. Hirasawa, N., Ogata, S., Yamada-Kawai, K.: Integration of user interface design process. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Product Focused Software, pp. 39–42 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Skudai, Malaysia.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masitah Ghazali .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ashraf, M., Ghazali, M. (2015). Cataloguing Physicality Values Using Physical Quantitative Evaluation Method. In: Wyeld, T., Calder, P., Shen, H. (eds) Computer-Human Interaction. Cognitive Effects of Spatial Interaction, Learning, and Ability. OzCHI 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8433. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16940-8_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-16940-8_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-16939-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-16940-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics