Skip to main content

Towards Domain Ontology Interoperability Measurement

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
  • 856 Accesses

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 513))

Abstract

Ontologies are reliable interoperability support components between information systems. However the need to make ontologies themselves interoperable to a measurable degree remains a challenge due to the semantic heteroginity problem. This paper specifically looks at domain ontologies and how to measure the interoperability degree between them to establish the extent to which they can replace each other. Different interoperability operations,semantic distance measures and lexical similarity between ontologies are dicussed. A method based on model management theory with algebraic operations such as match on the ontology models is proposed to measure lexical and structural dimensions of domain ontologies and give a value for their degree of interoperability. An example of how to compute the degree of interoperability between two domain ontologies using the proposed approach is given with an explanation of how the identified gaps can be addressed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Harsu, M.: A survey on domain engineering (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Seremeti, L., Kougias, I.: Computation of ontology resemblance coefficients for improving semantic interoperability. Eng. Math. Lett. 2, 1–19 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zutshi, A.: Framework for a business interoperability quotient measurement model. Master thesis dissertations, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal (2010). http://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/2646/1/Zutshi_2010.pdf

  5. Sanchez Ruenes, D.: Domain Ontology learning from the Web. Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informaticos, Universidad Politecnica de Catalufia (2007). http://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/6650/1/01Dsr01de02.pdf

  6. Acampora, G., Vitiello, A.: Improving agent interoperability through a memetic ontology alignment: a comparative study. In: Fuzzy-IEEE International Conference on Systems, pp. 1–8 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Interop, N.: State of Art Report Ontology Interoperability, (n.d.)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18, 1–31 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Euzenat, J.: Semantic precision and recall for ontology alignment evaluation. In: IJCAI, pp. 348–353 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics IV. LNCS, vol. 3730, pp. 146–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bruijn, J., Ehrig, M., Feier, C., Martins-Recuerda, F., Scharffe, F., Weiten, M.: Ontology mediation, merging, and aligning. In: Davies, J., Studer, R., Warren, P. (eds.) Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 95–113. Wiley, Chichester (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  13. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Anchor-PROMPT: using non-local context for semantic matching. Framework 39, 63–70 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Maedche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: {MAFRA} - an ontology mapping framework in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the ECAI Workshop on Transformation, Lyon, France (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 983–1024 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Amrouch, S., Mostefai, S.: Survey on the literature of ontology mapping, alignment and merging. In: 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, ICITeS (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Ehrig, M.: Ontology alignment - bridging the semantic gap. In: Management, p. 250 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Beneventano, D., Orsini, M., Po, L., Sorrentino, S.: The MOMIS - STASIS approach for ontology-based data integration. In: Proceedings of the ISDSI (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Kent, R.E.: The IFF foundation for ontological knowledge organization. Cat. Classif. Q. 37, 187–203 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S., Zucchelli, D.: HELIOS: a general framework for ontology-based knowledge sharing and evolution in P2P systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Choi, N., Song, I.-Y., Han, H.: A survey on ontology mapping. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 35, 34–41 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kotis, K., Vouros, G.A: The HCONE approach to ontology merging. In: Web. pp. 1–15 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Preece, A., Hui, K., Gray, A., Marti, P., Bench-Capon, T., Jones, D., et al.: KRAFT architecture for knowledge fusion and transformation. Knowl. Based Syst. 13, 113–120 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Do, H.-H., Rahm, E.: COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 610–621 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Stumme, G.: FCA-merge: bottom-up merging of ontologies. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 225–230 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Ehrig, M.: Foam - framework for ontology alignment and mapping; results of the ontology alignment initiative. In: Proceedings of the Work Integrated Ontology, vol. 156, pp. 72–76. CEUR-WS.org (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Lambrix, P., Tan, H.: SAMBO-A system for aligning and merging biomedical ontologies. Web Semant. 4, 196–206 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Li, J., Tang, J., Li, Y., Luo, Q.: RiMOM : a dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment. Framework 21, 1–15 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Clifton, C.: Experience with a combined approach to attribute-matching across heterogeneous databases. In: Techniques. pp. 1–17 (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  33. An, Y., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Inferring complex semantic mappings between relational tables and ontologies from simple correspondences. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1152–1169. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Qian, Y., Li, Y., Song, J., Yue, L.: Discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining, WISM, pp. 756–760 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Li, W.S., Clifton, C.: SEMINT: a tool for identifying attribute correspondences in heterogeneous databases using neural networks. Data Knowl. Eng. 33, 49–84 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Velegrakis, Y., Miller, R.J., Popa, L., Mylopoulos, J.: ToMAS: a system for adapting mappings while schemas evolve. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering, p. 862 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  37. Blanchard, E., Harzallah, M.: A typology of ontology-based semantic measures. In: EMOI (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 19, 17–30 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhibiao Wu, P.M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133–138 (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 265–283. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  42. Lin, D.: Principle-based parsing without overgeneralization. In: Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 112–120 (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Gan, M., Dou, X., Jiang, R.: From ontology to semantic similarity: calculation of ontology-based semantic similarity. Sci. World J. 2013, 793091 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sánchez, D., Batet, M., Isern, D., Valls, A.: Ontology-based semantic similarity: a new feature-based approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 7718–7728 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Al-Mubaid, H., Nguyen, H.A.: Measuring semantic similarity between biomedical concepts within multiple ontologies. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 39, 389–398 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: WordNet - An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 305–332 (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Luong, H.P., Gauch, S., Wang, Q.: Ontology learning through focused crawling and information extraction. In: International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering 2009, pp. 106–112. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  48. Knappe, R.: Measures of Semantic Similarity and Relatedness for Use in Ontology-based Information Retrieval (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pesquita, C., Faria, D., Falcão, A.O., Lord, P., Couto, F.M.: Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000443 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Bernstein, P.: Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In: Proceedings of the CIDR (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia under Research University grant Vots 02G31 and 00M19 are hereby acknowledged for some of the facilities utilized during the course of this research work and for supporting the related research.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ali Selamat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Sseggujja, H., Selamat, A. (2015). Towards Domain Ontology Interoperability Measurement. In: Fujita, H., Selamat, A. (eds) Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. SoMeT 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 513. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17529-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17530-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics