Abstract
Ontologies are reliable interoperability support components between information systems. However the need to make ontologies themselves interoperable to a measurable degree remains a challenge due to the semantic heteroginity problem. This paper specifically looks at domain ontologies and how to measure the interoperability degree between them to establish the extent to which they can replace each other. Different interoperability operations,semantic distance measures and lexical similarity between ontologies are dicussed. A method based on model management theory with algebraic operations such as match on the ontology models is proposed to measure lexical and structural dimensions of domain ontologies and give a value for their degree of interoperability. An example of how to compute the degree of interoperability between two domain ontologies using the proposed approach is given with an explanation of how the identified gaps can be addressed.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Gruber, T.R.: A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowl. Acquis. 5, 199–220 (1993)
Harsu, M.: A survey on domain engineering (2002)
Seremeti, L., Kougias, I.: Computation of ontology resemblance coefficients for improving semantic interoperability. Eng. Math. Lett. 2, 1–19 (2013)
Zutshi, A.: Framework for a business interoperability quotient measurement model. Master thesis dissertations, Departamento de Engenharia Mecânica e Industrial, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Portugal (2010). http://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/2646/1/Zutshi_2010.pdf
Sanchez Ruenes, D.: Domain Ontology learning from the Web. Ph.D. thesis, Departamento de Lenguajes y Sistemas Informaticos, Universidad Politecnica de Catalufia (2007). http://www.tdx.cat/bitstream/10803/6650/1/01Dsr01de02.pdf
Acampora, G., Vitiello, A.: Improving agent interoperability through a memetic ontology alignment: a comparative study. In: Fuzzy-IEEE International Conference on Systems, pp. 1–8 (2012)
Interop, N.: State of Art Report Ontology Interoperability, (n.d.)
Kalfoglou, Y., Schorlemmer, M.: Ontology mapping: the state of the art. Knowl. Eng. Rev. 18, 1–31 (2003)
Euzenat, J.: Semantic precision and recall for ontology alignment evaluation. In: IJCAI, pp. 348–353 (2007)
Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: A survey of schema-based matching approaches. In: Spaccapietra, S. (ed.) Journal on Data Semantics IV. LNCS, vol. 3730, pp. 146–171. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)
Bruijn, J., Ehrig, M., Feier, C., Martins-Recuerda, F., Scharffe, F., Weiten, M.: Ontology mediation, merging, and aligning. In: Davies, J., Studer, R., Warren, P. (eds.) Semantic Web Technologies, pp. 95–113. Wiley, Chichester (2006)
Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: Anchor-PROMPT: using non-local context for semantic matching. Framework 39, 63–70 (2001)
Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Maedche, A., Motik, B., Silva, N., Volz, R.: {MAFRA} - an ontology mapping framework in the semantic web. In: Proceedings of the ECAI Workshop on Transformation, Lyon, France (2002)
Noy, N.F., Musen, M.A.: The PROMPT suite: interactive tools for ontology merging and mapping. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 59, 983–1024 (2003)
Amrouch, S., Mostefai, S.: Survey on the literature of ontology mapping, alignment and merging. In: 2012 International Conference on Information Technology and E-Services, ICITeS (2012)
Ehrig, M.: Ontology alignment - bridging the semantic gap. In: Management, p. 250 (2005)
Beneventano, D., Orsini, M., Po, L., Sorrentino, S.: The MOMIS - STASIS approach for ontology-based data integration. In: Proceedings of the ISDSI (2009)
Klein, M., Fensel, D., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanov, D.: Ontology versioning and change detection on the web. In: Gómez-Pérez, A., Benjamins, V. (eds.) EKAW 2002. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2473, pp. 197–212. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)
Kent, R.E.: The IFF foundation for ontological knowledge organization. Cat. Classif. Q. 37, 187–203 (2003)
Castano, S., Ferrara, A., Montanelli, S., Zucchelli, D.: HELIOS: a general framework for ontology-based knowledge sharing and evolution in P2P systems. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Workshop on Database and Expert Systems Applications (2003)
Choi, N., Song, I.-Y., Han, H.: A survey on ontology mapping. ACM SIGMOD Rec. 35, 34–41 (2006)
Kotis, K., Vouros, G.A: The HCONE approach to ontology merging. In: Web. pp. 1–15 (2008)
Preece, A., Hui, K., Gray, A., Marti, P., Bench-Capon, T., Jones, D., et al.: KRAFT architecture for knowledge fusion and transformation. Knowl. Based Syst. 13, 113–120 (2000)
Do, H.-H., Rahm, E.: COMA: a system for flexible combination of schema matching approaches. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, pp. 610–621 (2002)
Stumme, G.: FCA-merge: bottom-up merging of ontologies. In: International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 225–230 (2001)
Ehrig, M.: Foam - framework for ontology alignment and mapping; results of the ontology alignment initiative. In: Proceedings of the Work Integrated Ontology, vol. 156, pp. 72–76. CEUR-WS.org (2005)
Lambrix, P., Tan, H.: SAMBO-A system for aligning and merging biomedical ontologies. Web Semant. 4, 196–206 (2006)
Giunchiglia, F., Shvaiko, P., Yatskevich, M.: S-match: an algorithm and an implementation of semantic matching. In: Bussler, C.J., Davies, J., Fensel, D., Studer, R. (eds.) ESWS 2004. LNCS, vol. 3053, pp. 61–75. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Li, J., Tang, J., Li, Y., Luo, Q.: RiMOM : a dynamic multistrategy ontology alignment. Framework 21, 1–15 (2009)
Clifton, C.: Experience with a combined approach to attribute-matching across heterogeneous databases. In: Techniques. pp. 1–17 (1997)
An, Y., Borgida, A., Mylopoulos, J.: Inferring complex semantic mappings between relational tables and ontologies from simple correspondences. In: Meersman, R. (ed.) OTM 2005. LNCS, vol. 3761, pp. 1152–1169. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Qian, Y., Li, Y., Song, J., Yue, L.: Discovering complex semantic matches between database schemas. In: International Conference on Web Information Systems and Mining, WISM, pp. 756–760 (2009)
Li, W.S., Clifton, C.: SEMINT: a tool for identifying attribute correspondences in heterogeneous databases using neural networks. Data Knowl. Eng. 33, 49–84 (2000)
Velegrakis, Y., Miller, R.J., Popa, L., Mylopoulos, J.: ToMAS: a system for adapting mappings while schemas evolve. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Data Engineering, p. 862 (2004)
Blanchard, E., Harzallah, M.: A typology of ontology-based semantic measures. In: EMOI (2005)
Rada, R., Mili, H., Bicknell, E., Blettner, M.: Development and application of a metric on semantic nets. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man. Cybern. 19, 17–30 (1989)
Zhibiao Wu, P.M.: Verb semantics and lexical selection. In: Proceedings of the 32nd Annual Meeting on Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 133–138 (1994)
Leacock, C., Chodorow, M.: Combining local context and WordNet similarity for word sense identification. In: Fellbaum, C. (ed.) WordNet An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 265–283. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)
Resnik, P.: Using information content to evaluate semantic similarity in a taxonomy. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (1995)
Lin, D.: Principle-based parsing without overgeneralization. In: Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics, pp. 112–120 (1993)
Gan, M., Dou, X., Jiang, R.: From ontology to semantic similarity: calculation of ontology-based semantic similarity. Sci. World J. 2013, 793091 (2013)
Sánchez, D., Batet, M., Isern, D., Valls, A.: Ontology-based semantic similarity: a new feature-based approach. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 7718–7728 (2012)
Al-Mubaid, H., Nguyen, H.A.: Measuring semantic similarity between biomedical concepts within multiple ontologies. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man, Cybern. Part C (Appl. Rev.) 39, 389–398 (2009)
Hirst, G., St-Onge, D.: Lexical chains as representations of context for the detection and correction of malapropisms. In: WordNet - An Electronic Lexical Database, pp. 305–332 (1998)
Luong, H.P., Gauch, S., Wang, Q.: Ontology learning through focused crawling and information extraction. In: International Conference on Knowledge and Systems Engineering 2009, pp. 106–112. IEEE (2009)
Knappe, R.: Measures of Semantic Similarity and Relatedness for Use in Ontology-based Information Retrieval (2005)
Pesquita, C., Faria, D., Falcão, A.O., Lord, P., Couto, F.M.: Semantic similarity in biomedical ontologies. PLoS Comput. Biol. 5, e1000443 (2009)
Bernstein, P.: Applying model management to classical meta data problems. In: Proceedings of the CIDR (2003)
Acknowledgements
The Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and Ministry of Education (MOE) Malaysia under Research University grant Vots 02G31 and 00M19 are hereby acknowledged for some of the facilities utilized during the course of this research work and for supporting the related research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sseggujja, H., Selamat, A. (2015). Towards Domain Ontology Interoperability Measurement. In: Fujita, H., Selamat, A. (eds) Intelligent Software Methodologies, Tools and Techniques. SoMeT 2014. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 513. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17530-0_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17529-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17530-0
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)