Skip to main content

Learning Complex Activity Preconditions in Process Mining

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 8983))

Abstract

The availability of automatic support may sometimes determine the successful accomplishment of a process. Such a support can be provided if a model of the intended process is available. Many real-world process models are very complex. Additionally, their components might be associated to conditions that determine whether they are to be carried out or not. These conditions may be in turn very complex, involving sequential relationships that take into account the past history of the current process execution. In this landscape, writing and setting up manually the process models and conditions might be infeasible, and even standard Machine Learning approaches may be unable to infer them.

This paper presents a First-Order Logic-based approach to learn complex process models extended with conditions. It combines two powerful Inductive Logic Programming systems. The overall system was exploited to learn the daily routines of the user of a smart environment, for predicting his needs and comparing the actual situation with the expected one. In addition to proving the efficiency and effectiveness of the system, the outcomes show that complex, human-readable and interesting preconditions can be learned for the tasks involved in the process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Mathematically, to split a number \(n\) in two numbers \(n_1\) and \(n_2\) so that \(n_1^{n_2}\) is maximum, one must take \(n_1 = n_2 = \sqrt{n}\).

  2. 2.

    Actually, for one day the activity labels were missing, for which reason the corresponding case was removed from the dataset.

References

  1. Agrawal, R., Gunopulos, D., Leymann, F.: Mining process models from workflow logs. In: Schek, H.-J., Saltor, F., Ramos, I., Alonso, G. (eds.) EDBT 1998. LNCS, vol. 1377, pp. 469–483. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Anderson, C.R., Domingos, P., Weld, D.S.: Relational markov models and their application to adaptive web navigation. In: Hand, D., Keim, D., Ng, R. (eds.) Proceedings of the Eighth ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD-2002), pp. 143–152. ACM Press (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Cook, J.E., Wolf, A.L.: Discovering models of software processes from event-based data. Technical report CU-CS-819-96, Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Esposito, F., Di Mauro, N., Basile, T.M.A., Ferilli, S.: Multi-dimensional relational sequence mining. Fundamenta Informaticae 89(1), 23–43 (2008)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Esposito, F., Semeraro, G., Fanizzi, N., Ferilli, S.: Multistrategy theory revision: induction and abduction in inthelex. Mach. Learn. J. 38(1/2), 133–156 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ferilli, S.: Woman: logic-based workflow learning and management. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern.: Syst. 44, 744–756 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ferilli, S., Basile, T.M.A., Biba, M., Di Mauro, N., Esposito, F.: A general similarity framework for horn clause logic. Fundamenta Informaticæ 90(1–2), 43–46 (2009)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Ferilli, S., De Carolis, B., Redavid, D.: Logic-based incremental process mining in smart environments. In: Ali, M., Bosse, T., Hindriks, K.V., Hoogendoorn, M., Jonker, C.M., Treur, J. (eds.) IEA/AIE 2013. LNCS, vol. 7906, pp. 392–401. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  9. Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: A heuristic approach to handling sequential information in incremental ILP. In: Baldoni, M., Baroglio, C., Boella, G., Micalizio, R. (eds.) AI*IA 2013. LNCS, vol. 8249, pp. 109–120. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Ferilli, S., Esposito, F.: A logic framework for incremental learning of process models. Fundamenta Informaticae 128, 413–443 (2013)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Gutmann, B., Kersting, K.: TildeCRF: conditional random fields for logical sequences. In: Fürnkranz, J., Scheffer, T., Spiliopoulou, M. (eds.) ECML 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4212, pp. 174–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Herbst, J., Karagiannis, D.: An inductive approach to the acquisition and adaptation of workflow models. In: Proceedings of the IJCAI 1999 Workshop on Intelligent Workflow and Process Management: The New Frontier for AI in Business, pp. 52–57 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jacobs, N.: Relational sequence learning and user modelling (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Kersting, K., De Raedt, L., Gutmann, B., Karwath, A., Landwehr, N.: Relational sequence learning. In: De Raedt, L., Frasconi, P., Kersting, K., Muggleton, S.H. (eds.) Probabilistic ILP 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4911, pp. 28–55. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Kersting, K., Raiko, T., Kramer, S., De Raedt, L.: Towards discovering structural signatures of protein folds based on logical hidden markov models. Technical report report00175, Institut fur Informatik, Universit at Freiburg, 13 June 2002

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dan Lee, S., De Raedt, L.: Constraint based mining of first order sequences in SeqLog. In: Meo, R., Lanzi, P.L., Klemettinen, M. (eds.) Database Support for Data Mining Applications. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2682, pp. 154–173. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  17. Muggleton, S.: Inductive logic programming. New Gener. Comput. 8(4), 295–318 (1991)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. van der Aalst, W.M.P.: The application of Petri Nets to workflow management. J. Circuits, Syst. Comput. 8, 21–66 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Weijters, A.J.M.M., van der Aalst, W.M.P.: Rediscovering workflow models from event-based data. In: Hoste, V., De Pauw, G. (eds.) Proceedings of the 11th Dutch-Belgian Conference of Machine Learning (Benelearn 2001), pp. 93–100 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was partially funded by the Italian PON 2007–2013 project PON02_00563_3489339 ‘Puglia@Service’.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Ferilli .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Ferilli, S., De Carolis, B., Esposito, F. (2015). Learning Complex Activity Preconditions in Process Mining. In: Appice, A., Ceci, M., Loglisci, C., Manco, G., Masciari, E., Ras, Z. (eds) New Frontiers in Mining Complex Patterns. NFMCP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 8983. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17876-9_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17876-9_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17875-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17876-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics