Abstract
Business process improvement is essential for success of enterprises according to the quality philosophy and ISO 9000:2008. On the way to achieving this goal, a very successful approach is the employment of quality improvement projects. This chapter proposes a model for evaluation of projects for business process quality improvement. The performances of the treated type of projects are analyzed in the scope of standard ISO 215000:2015 and the results of good practice. An arranged pair (relative importance, value) is associated to each performance. The relative importance of project performances is assessed on the basis of experts’ judgments from the manufacturing industry and they are introduced by linguistic expressions which are close to human thinking. The values of project performances are determined by measurement or they are based on assessment by a project management team. Modeling of linguistic expressions is performed by fuzzy sets theory. The relative importance of each pair of business processes and project performances is determined on the level of the treated specimen of enterprises. The total score of the project is determined by using fuzzy logic . The model for evaluation of projects for business process quality improvement is verified through a case study example.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Ahadzie, D.K., Proverbs, D.G., Olomolaiye, P.P.: Critical success criteria for mass house building projects in developing countries. Int. J. Project Manage. 26(6), 675–687 (2008)
Aleksić, A., Stefanović, M., Arsovski, S., Tadić, D.: An assessment of organizational resilience potential in SMEs of the process industry, a fuzzy approach. J. Loss Prev. Process Ind. 26, 1238–1245 (2013)
Barcaly, C., Osei-Bryson, K.M.: Project performance development framework: an approach for developing performance criteria and measures for information systems (IS) projects. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 124, 272–292 (2010)
Bass, M.S., Kwakernaak, H.: Rating and ranking of multiple-aspect alternatives using fuzzy sets. Automatica 3 47–58 (1977)
Beck, T.: Evaluating humanitarian action using the OECD-DAC criteria: an ALANP guide for humanitarian agencies. Overseas Development Institute, London (2006)
Billy, H., Cameron, I., Duff, A.R.: Exploring the integration of health and safety with pre-construction planning. Eng. Constr. Archi. Manage. 13(5), 438–450 (2006)
Bozbura, T.F., Beskese, A., Kahraman, C.: Prioritization of human capital measurement indicators using fuzzy AHP. Expert Syst. Appl. 32, 1100–1112 (2007)
Bryde, D.J.: Modeling project management performance. Inter. J. Qual. Reliab. Manage. 20(2), 229–254 (2003)
Bryde, D.J.: Perceptions of the impact of project sponsorship practices on project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 26(8), 800–809 (2008)
Büyüközkan, G., Feyzioğlu, O., Neobol, E.: Selection of the strategic alliance partner in logistics value chain. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 113, 148–158 (2008)
Chang, D.Y.: Applications of the extent analysis method on fuzzy AHP. Eur. J. Oper. Res 95 649–655 (1996)
Chen, P.H., Weng, H.: A two-phase GA model for resource-constrained project scheduling. Autom. Constr. 18, 485–498 (2009)
Chen, Y., Okudan, G.E., Riley, D.R.: Sustainable performance criteria for construction method selection in concentrate buildings. Autom. Constr. 19(2), 235–244 (2010)
Cheng, M.Y., Tsai, H.C., Sudjono, E.: Evolutionary fuzzy hybrid neural network for dynamic project success assessment in construction industry. Autom. Constr. 21, 46–51 (2012)
Chou, J.S., Yang, J.G.: Evolutionary optimization of model specification searches between project management knowledge and construction engineering performance. Expert Syst. Appl. 40, 4414–4426 (2013)
Chua, D.K.H., Loh, P.K., Kog, Y.C., Jaselskis, E.J.: Neural networks for construction project success. Expert Syst. Appl. 13(4), 317–328 (1997)
Coccoa, P., Alberti, M.: A framework to assess performance measurement systems in SMEs. Int. J. Prod. Performance Manage. 59(2), 186–200 (2009)
Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Fuzzy Sets and Systems: Theory and Applications. Academic press Inc., London (1980)
Fan, S.L., Sun, K.S., Wang, Y.R.: GA optimization model for repetitive projects with soft logic. Autom. in Constr. 21, 253–261 (2012)
Fortune, J., White, D., Judgev, K., Walker, D.: Looking again at current practice in project management. Int. J. Project Manage. 4(4), 553–572 (2011)
Franco-Santos, M., Kennerley, M., Micheli, P., Martinez, V., Mason, S., Marr, B., et al.: Towards a definition of a business performance measurement system. Int. J. Oper. Prod. Manage. 27, 784–801 (2007)
Gardiner, K.S.: Revisting the golden triangle of cost, time, and quality: the role of NPV in project control, success, and failure. Int. J. Project Manage. 18(4), 251–256 (2000)
Georgy, M.E., Chang, L.M., Zhang, L.: Prediction of engineering performance: a neuro fuzzy approach. J. Constr. Eng. Manage. 131(5), 548–557 (2005)
Gumus, T.A.: Evaluation of hazardous waste transportation firms by using a two step fuzzy-AHP and TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 36, 4067–4074 (2009)
Ika, L.A., Daillo, A., Thuiller, D.: Critical success factors for World Bank projects: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Project Manage. 30, 105–116 (2012)
Jaakkola, M., Möller, K., Parvinen, P., Evanschitzky, H., Mühlbacher, H.: Strategic marketing and business performance: A study in three European ‘engineering countries’. Ind. Mark. Manage. 39, 1300–1310 (2010)
Kahraman, C., Ertay, T., Büyüközkan, G.: A fuzzy optimization model for QFD planning process using analytic network process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 171, 390–411 (2006)
Kaya, T., Kahraman, C.: Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst. Appl. 38, 6577–6585 (2011)
Khalili-Damghani, K., Sadi-Nezhad, S., Lotfi, H.F., Tavana, M.: A hybrid fuzzy rule-based multiple-criteria framework for sustainable project portfolio selection. Inf. Sci. 220, 442–462 (2013)
Klir, G.J., Folger, T.: Fuzzy Sets, Uncertainty, and Information. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River (1988)
Medineckiene, M., Turskis, Z., Zavadskas, E.K.: Sustainable construction taking into account the building impact of the environment. J. Environ. Eng. Landscape Manage. 18(2), 118–127 (2010)
Merigó, J.M., Casanovas, M.: Using fuzzy numbers in heavy aggregation operators. Int. J. Inf. Technol. 4(4), 267–272 (2008)
Mir, A.F., Pinnington, H.A.: Exploring the value of project management: linking project management performance and project success. Int. J. Project Manage. 32, 202–217 (2014)
Müller, R., Judgev, K.: Critical success factors in projects, pinto, slevin and prescott-the education of project success. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 5(4), 757–775 (2012)
Neely, A.D., Kennerly, M., Adams, C.: Performance measurement frameworks: a review. In: Neely, A. (ed.) Business Performance Measurement: Theory and Practice, pp. 143–162. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2007)
Ngacho, C., Das, D.: A performance evaluation framework of development projects: an empirical study of constituency development fund (CFD) construction projects in Kenya. Int. J. Project Manage. 32, 492–507 (2014)
Nudurupati, S.S., Bititci, U.S., Kumar, V. Chan, F.T.S.: State of the art literature review on performance measurement. Comput. Ind. Eng. 60, 279–290 (2011)
Oakland, S.J.: Oakland on Quality Management. Elsevier, London (2004)
Paskoy, T., Pehlivan, Y.N., Kahraman, C.: Organizational strategy development in distribution channel management using fuzzy AHP and hierarchical fuzzy TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 39, 2822–2841 (2012)
Seçme, Y.N., Bayrakdaroğu, Kahraman, C.: Fuzzy performance evaluation in turkish banking sector using analytic hierarchy 11709 Process and TOPSIS. Expert Syst. Appl. 36 11699–11709 (2009)
Shao, J., Müllier, R.: The development of constructions of program context and program success: a qualitative study. Int. J. Proj. Manage. 29(8), 947–959 (2011)
Shenhar, A.J., Dvir, D., Levy, O., Maltz, A.C.: Project success: a multidimensional strategic concept. Long Range Plan. 34 699–725 (2001)
Shih, H.S., Shyur, H.J., Lee, E.S.: An extension of TOPSIS for group decision making. Math. Comput. Model. 45 (7/8), 801–813 (2007)
Tabish, S.Z.S., Jha, K.N.: Analysis of irregularities in public procurement in India. Constr. Manage. Econ. 29(3), 261–274 (2011)
Tadić, D., Gumus, T.A., Arsovski, S., Aleksić, A., Stefanović, M.: An evaluation of quality goals by using fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. J. Intell. Fuzzy Syst. 25, 547–556 (2013)
Tan, Y., Shen, L., Yao, H.: Sustainable construction practice and constructors’ competitiveness: a preliminary study. Habitat Int. 35(2), 225–230 (2011)
Taylan, O., Bafail, A.O.A., Abdulaal, S.M.R., Kabli, R.M.: Construction projects selection and risk assessment by fuzzy AHP and fuzzy TOPSIS methodologies. Appl. Soft Comput. 17, 105–116 (2014)
Zadeh, L.A.: The concept of a linguistic variable and its application to approximate reasoning. Inf. Sci. 8(3), 199–249 (1975)
Zimmermann, H.J.: Fuzzy Set Theory and Its Applications. Kluwer Nijhoff Publishing, Boston (2001)
Zuo, P.X.W.: Fostering a strong construction safety culture. Leadersh. Manage. Eng. 11(1), 11–22 (2011)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Tadić, D., Arsovski, S., Aleksić, A., Stefanović, M., Nestić, S. (2015). A Fuzzy Evaluation of Projects for Business Processes’ Quality Improvement. In: Kahraman, C., Çevik Onar, S. (eds) Intelligent Techniques in Engineering Management. Intelligent Systems Reference Library, vol 87. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17906-3_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-17906-3_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-17905-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-17906-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)