Skip to main content

Optimizing Classifiers for Hypothetical Scenarios

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (PAKDD 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 9077))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The deployment of classification models is an integral component of many modern data mining and machine learning applications. A typical classification model is built with the tacit assumption that the deployment scenario by which it is evaluated is fixed and fully characterized. Yet, in the practical deployment of classification methods, important aspects of the application environment, such as the misclassification costs, may be uncertain during model building. Moreover, a single classification model may be applied in several different deployment scenarios. In this work, we propose a method to optimize a model for uncertain deployment scenarios. We begin by deriving a relationship between two evaluation measures, H measure and cost curves, that may be used to address uncertainty in classifier performance. We show that when uncertainty in classifier performance is modeled as a probabilistic belief that is a function of this underlying relationship, a natural definition of risk emerges for both classifiers and instances. We then leverage this notion of risk to develop a boosting-based algorithm—which we call RiskBoost—that directly mitigates classifier risk, and we demonstrate that it outperforms AdaBoost on a diverse selection of datasets.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bache, K., Lichman, M.: UCI machine learning repository (2013). http://archive.ics.uci.edu/ml

  2. Chawla, N.V., Lazarevic, A., Hall, L.O., Bowyer, K.W.: SMOTEBoost: improving prediction of the minority class in boosting. In: Lavrač, N., Gamberger, D., Todorovski, L., Blockeel, H. (eds.) PKDD 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2838, pp. 107–119. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Davis, J., Goadrich, M.: The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 233–240. ACM (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Demšar, J.: Statistical comparisons of classifiers over multiple data sets. Journal of Machine Learning Research (JMLR) 7, 1–30 (2006)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Domingos, P.: MetaCost: a general method for making classifiers cost-sensitive. In: Proceedings of the 5th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 155–164. ACM (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Drummond, C., Holte, R.C.: Cost curves: An improved method for visualizing classifier performance. Machine Learning 65(1), 95–130 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fawcett, T.: An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 27(8), 861–874 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Freund, Y., Schapire, R.E.: Experiments with a new boosting algorithm. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 148–156 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hand, D.J.: Measuring classifier performance: A coherent alternative to the area under the ROC curve. Machine Learning 77(1), 103–123 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., Friedman, J.: The Elements of Statistical Learning, vol. 2 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Lempert, R.J., Popper, S.W., Bankes, S.C.: Shaping the Next One Hundred Years: New Methods for Quantitative, Long-Term Policy Analysis, Rand Corp (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Masnadi-Shirazi, H., Vasconcelos, N.: Cost-sensitive boosting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence (TPAMI) 33(2), 294–309 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Provost, F., Fawcett, T.: Analysis and visualization of classifier performance: comparison under imprecise class and cost distributions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 43–48. AAAI (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Provost, F., Fawcett, T.: Robust classification for imprecise environments. Machine Learning 42(3), 203–231 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Quinlan, J.R.: Bagging, boosting, and C4.5. In: Proceedings of the 13th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), pp. 725–730 (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Raeder, T., Hoens, T.R., Chawla, N.V.: Consequences of variability in classifier performance estimates. In: Proceedings of the 10th IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 421–430. IEEE (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Seiffert, C., Khoshgoftaar, T.M., Hulse, J.V., Napolitano, A.: RUSBoost: Improving classification performance when training data is skewed. In: Proceedings of the 19th International Conference on Pattern Recognition (ICPR), pp. 1–4. IEEE (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sun, Y., Kamel, M.S., Wong, A.K.C., Wang, Y.: Cost-sensitive boosting for classification of imbalanced data. Pattern Recognition 40(12), 3358–3378 (2007)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Ting, K.M.: A comparative study of cost-sensitive boosting algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 17th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML), pp. 983–990

    Google Scholar 

  20. Zadrozny, B., Elkan, C.: Learning and making decisions when costs and probabilities are both unknown. In: Proceedings of the 7th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD), pp. 204–213. ACM (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Zadrozny, B., Langford, J., Abe, N.: Cost-sensitive learning by cost-proportionate example weighting. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Conference on Data Mining (ICDM), pp. 435–442. IEEE (2003)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nitesh V. Chawla .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Johnson, R.A., Raeder, T., Chawla, N.V. (2015). Optimizing Classifiers for Hypothetical Scenarios. In: Cao, T., Lim, EP., Zhou, ZH., Ho, TB., Cheung, D., Motoda, H. (eds) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. PAKDD 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9077. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18038-0_21

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18038-0_21

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18037-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18038-0

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics