Abstract
Organizational ambidexterity is the ability to be aligned and efficient in combining current resources and demands (exploitation) as well as adaptive and innovative due to changing conditions and demands (exploration). Maturity in software development is defined over exploitation – through processes definition and control. We argue in this study that mature agile software development is also exploratory – adaptive and innovative. Thus, our objective is to verify how ambidexterity occurs in mature agile software development. The research approach is a single case study with analysis of qualitative data. Our findings show how a mature team is managed by ambidextrous strategies.
Keywords
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Tushman, M.L., O’Reilly III, C.A.: Ambidextrous organizations: Managing evolutionary and revolutionary change. California Manag. Review 38, 8–30 (1996)
Raish, S., Birkinshaw, J.: Organizational Ambidexterity: Antecedents. Outcomes and Moderators. J. Manag. 34, 375–409 (2008). doi:10.1177/0149206308316058
March, J.G.: Exploration and Exploitation in Organizational Learning. Organiz. Sci. 2 (1991)
Fontana, R.M., Fontana, I.M., Garbuio, P.A.R., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: People over processes: how should agile software development be defined? J. Syst. Softw. 97, 140–155 (2014). doi:10.1016/j.jss.2014.07.030
Fontana, R.M., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A.: Maturing in agile: what is it about?. In: roceedings of the 15th International Conference, XP 2014, Rome, Italy, pp. 94–109, 26–30 May 2014. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-06862-6_7
Tuner, N., Swart, J., Maylor, H.: Mechanisms for Managing Ambidexterity: A Review and Research Agenda. Int. J. Manag. Reviews 15, 317–332 (2013). doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2012.00343.x
Gibson, C., Birkinshaw, J.: The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy Manag. J. 47, 209–226 (2004). doi:10.2307/20159573
Tiwana, A.: Do bridging ties complement strong ties? An empirical examination of alliance ambidexterity. Strat. Mgmt. J. 29, 251–272 (2008). doi:10.1002/smj.666
Tiwana, A.: Systems Development Ambidexterity: Explaining the Complementary and Substitutive Roles of Formal and Informal Controls. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 27, 87–126 (2010). doi:10.2753/MIS0742-1222270203
Harris, M.L., Collins, R.W., Hevner, A.R.: Control of Flexible Software Development Under Uncertainty. Inf. Syst. Research 20, 400–419 (2009). doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0240
Vidgen, R., Wang, X.: Coevolving Systems and the Organization of Agile Software Development. Inform Syst Res. 20, 355–376 (2009). doi:10.1287/isre.1090.0237
Boehm, B.; Turner, R.: Balancing agility and discipline: evaluating and integrating agile and plan-driven methods. In: Proceedings of the 26th International Conference on Software Engineering, 23–28, 718–729 (2004). doi:10.1109/ICSE.2004.1317503
Attride-Sterling, J.: Thematic networks: an analytic tool for qualitative research. Qualitative Research 1, 385–405 (2001). doi:10.1177/146879410100100307
Eisenhardt, K.: Building Theories from Case Study Research. Academy Manag. Review 14, 532–550 (1989). doi:http://www.jstor.org/stable/258557
Boehm, B.: Get ready for agile methods, with care. IEEE Comp. 35, 64–69 (2002). doi:10.1109/2.976920
Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Madsen, S.: Post-agility: What follows a decade of agility? Inf. Soft. Tech. 53, 543–555 (2011). doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2010.10.010
Lee, G., Delone, W., Espinosa, J.A.: Ambidextrous Coping Strategies in Globally Distributed Software Development Projects: Strategies for enhancing flexibility and rigor. Comm. ACM 49, 35–40 (2006). doi:10.1145/1164394.1164417
Ramesh, B., Mohan, K., Cao, L.: Ambidexterity in Agile Distributed Development: An Empirical Investigation. Inf. Syst. Research 23, 323–339 (2012). doi:10.1287/isre.1110.0351
Melo, C.O., Cruzes, D.S., Kon, F., Conradi, R.: Interpretative case studies on agile team productivity and management. Inf. Soft. Tech. 55, 412–427 (2013). doi:10.1016/j.infsof.2012.09.004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Fontana, R.M., Meyer, V., Reinehr, S., Malucelli, A. (2015). Management Ambidexterity: A Clue for Maturing in Agile Software Development. In: Lassenius, C., Dingsøyr, T., Paasivaara, M. (eds) Agile Processes in Software Engineering and Extreme Programming. XP 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 212. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18612-2_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18611-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18612-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)