Abstract
The deep economic crisis where we are immersed, together with the recuperation perspectives, intensifies the efforts in the socioeconomic field to find new solutions to prevent the current involution process. One of the key factors to achieve this goal is based in rationalization and the outlay containment. But obviously, this purpose is not enough by itself, and will not make the real economy improve (the one which is perceived by all citizens, which becomes permeable in all social layers, and the one which allows a permanent welfare), and will never stay up longer than a short term. It is important to accompany these scarifying measures imposed to the citizenship with adequate politics, depending on the selected objectives. Just like that, we need to prioritize the expenses and inversions, which could generate wide multiplying effects in the economy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsNotes
- 1.
This abstract has been extracted from Daniel Kahneman’s speech for his joining in the Royal Academy of Economic and Financial Sciences of Spain. Madrid, \(14\)th of June \(2012\).
- 2.
Gathered by J. Gil-Aluja’s answer at Daniel Kahneman’s speech, see footnote 1.
- 3.
See footnote 2.
- 4.
More details in this subject can be found in: [4, pp. 14–17].
- 5.
Gathered by Gil-Aluja, J.’s answer at Joseph E. Stiglitz’s speech in his joining in the Royal Academy of the Economic and Financial Sciences: The price of inequality, RACEF 2012, p. 38.
References
Aristotele: Obras. Lógica. De la expresión o Interpretación, Aguilar (1977)
Einstein, A., Speziali, P., Besso, M.: Correspondance 1903–1955. Hermann (1972)
Gil-Aluja, J.: Lances y desventuras del nuevo paradigma de la teoría de la decisión. In: Proceedings del III Congreso SIGEF. Buenos Aires, pp. 10–13 (1996)
Gil-Aluja, J.: Elements for a Theory of Decisión in Uncertainty, vol. 32. Kluwer, London (1999)
Gil-Aluja, J.: Reflexiones ante un nuevo pensamiento económico. Ed. CIDEM, Morelia (2005)
Gil-Aluja, J., Gil-Lafuente, A.M.: Pretopology. In: Towards an Advanced Modelling of Complex Economic Phenomena, pp. 3–27. Springer, Berlin (2012)
Kahneman, D., Knetsch, J.L., Thaler, R.H.: Anomalies: the endowment effect, loss aversion, and status quo bias. J. Econ. Perspect. 5(1), 193–206 (1991)
Kaufmann, A., Aluja, J.G.: Modelos para la investigación de efectos olvidados, Milladoiro (1988)
Łukasiewicz, J.: O zasadzie wylaczonego srodka. Przegl’d Filozficzny 13, 372–373 (1910)
Stiglitz, J.: El precio de la desigualdad. Taurus (2012)
Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy sets. Inf. Control 8(3), 338–353 (1965)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Gil-Lafuente, A.M., Balvey, A. (2015). Crisis’ Origin’s Causes. Contributions from the Fuzzy Logic in the Sustainability on the Socio-Economic Systems. In: Seising, R., Trillas, E., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Towards the Future of Fuzzy Logic. Studies in Fuzziness and Soft Computing, vol 325. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18750-1_11
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-18750-1_11
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-18749-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-18750-1
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)