Skip to main content

Abstract

Research on agent interaction has attracted the attention of agent researchers for a long time. This paper revisits an old work to find uses of an argumentation protocol which borrows from social sciences to raise agreements among several agents. In this protocol, several agents discuss and provide a conclusion after some rounds of mutual information exchange. The work is reusing INGENIAS methodology to model and deploy the examples and illustrate benefits of this protocol proposal. It also analyses the requirements of this protocol for its application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cuhls, K.: Delphi method. Technical report, Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Dalkey, N., Helmer, O.: An experimental application of the Delphi method to the use of experts. Manag. Sci. 9(3), 458–467 (1963)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. García-Magariño, I., Gómez-Sanz, J.J., Pérez-Agüera, J.R.: A complete-computerised Delphi process with a multi-agent system. In: Programming Multi-Agent Systems, 6th International Workshop, ProMAS 2008, Estoril, Portugal, 13 May 2008. Revised Invited and Selected Papers, pp. 120–135 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  4. García-Magariño, I., Gómez-Sanz, J.J., Pérez-Agüera, J.R.: A multi-agent based implementation of a Delphi process. In: 7th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2008), Estoril, Portugal, 12–16 May 2008, vol. 3, pp. 1543–1546 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gomez-Sanz, J.J.: Ten years of the INGENIAS methodology. In: Shehory, O., Sturm, A. (eds.) Agent-Oriented Software Engineering, pp. 193–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Hannebauer, M.: Multi-phase consensus communication in collaborative problem solving. In: Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Communication-Based Systems, pp. 131–146. Kluwer (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Holsapple, C.W., Joshi, K.D.: Knowledge manipulation activities: results of a Delphi study. Inf. Manag. 39, 477–490 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lamport, L., Shostak, R., Pease, M.: The byzantine generals problem. ACM Trans. Program. Lang. Syst. 4(3), 382–401 (1982)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Luck, M., McBurney, P.: Computing as Interaction: Agent and Agreement Technologies, pp. 1–6. Unknown Publisher (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Luehrs, R., Pavón, J., Schneider, M.: DEMOS tools for online discussion and decision making. In: ICWE, pp. 525–528 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I.: Argumentation in multi-agent systems: context and recent developments. In: Maudet, N., Parsons, S., Rahwan, I. (eds.) ArgMAS 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4766, pp. 1–16. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. McBurney, P., Parsons, S., Wooldridge, M.: Desiderata for agent argumentation protocols. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, AAMAS 2002, pp. 402–409. ACM, New York (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ossowski, S.: Agreement Technologies, vol. 8. Springer Science & Business Media, Netherlands (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Pavón, J., Gómez-Sanz, J.J.: Agent oriented software engineering with INGENIAS. In: Mařík, V., Müller, J.P., Pěchouček, M. (eds.) CEEMAS 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2691, pp. 394–403. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Rosenschein, J.S., Zlotkin, G.: Rules of Encounter: Designing Conventions for Automated Negotiation Among Computers. MIT Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Sabater, J., Sierra, C.: Reputation and social network analysis in multi-agent systems. In: Proceedings of the First International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems: Part 1, pp. 475–482 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Turoff, M., Hiltz, S.R.: Computer based Delphi processes. In: Gazing into the Oracle. The Delphi Method and Its Application to Social Policy and Public Health, pp. 56–85. Jessica Kingsley Publishers, London (1996)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

We acknowledge support from the project “SOCIAL AMBIENT ASSISTING LIVING - METHODS (SociAAL)”, supported by Spanish Ministry for Economy and Competitiveness, with grant TIN2011-28335-C02-01 and by the Programa de Creación y Consolidación de Grupos de Investigación UCM-Banco Santander, call GR3/14, for the group number 921354 (GRASIA group).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jorge J. Gomez-Sanz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Gomez-Sanz, J.J., Fernandez, R.F. (2015). Revisiting the Delphi Method for Agents. In: Bajo, J., et al. Highlights of Practical Applications of Agents, Multi-Agent Systems, and Sustainability - The PAAMS Collection. PAAMS 2015. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 524. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_32

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19033-4_32

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19032-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19033-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics