Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 364))

Abstract

Standard classification process allocates all processed elements to given classes. Such type of classification assumes that there are only native and no foreign elements, i.e., all processed elements are included in given classes. The quality of standard classification can be measured by two factors: numbers of correctly and incorrectly classified elements, called True Positives and False Positives. Admitting foreign elements in standard classification process increases False Positives and, in this way, deteriorates quality of classification. In this context, it is desired to reject foreign elements, i.e., not to assign them to any of given classes. Rejecting foreign elements will reduce the number of false positives, but can also reject native elements reducing True Positives as side effect. Therefore, it is important to build well-designed rejection, which will reject significant part of foreigners and only few natives. In this paper, evaluations of classification with rejection concepts are presented. Three main models: a classification without rejection, a classification with rejection, and a classification with reclassification are presented. The concepts are illustrated by flexible ensembles of binary classifiers with evaluations of each model. The proposed models can be used, in particular, as classifiers working with noised data, where recognized input is not limited to elements of known classes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Chang, C.-C., Lin, C.-J.: LIBSVM: a library for support vector machines. ACM Trans. Intell. Syst. Technol. 2, 1–27 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chow, C.: On optimum recognition error and reject tradeoff. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 16(1), 41–46 (1970)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Fumera, G., Roli, F.: Analysis of error-reject trade-off in linearly combined multiple classifiers. Pattern Recogn. 37, 1245–1265 (2004)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Graves, D., Pedrycz, W.: Kernel-based fuzzy clustering and fuzzy clustering: a comparative experimental study (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Ha, T.M.: Optimum tradeoff between class-selective rejection error and average number of classes. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 10(6), 525–529 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ishibuchi, H., Nakashima, T., Morisawa, T.: Voting in fuzzy rule-based systems for pattern classification problems. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 103, 223–238 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Li, M., Sethi, I.K.: Confidence-based classifier design. Pattern Recogn. 39(7), 1230–1240 (2006)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lou, Z., Liu, K., Yang, J.Y., Suen, C.Y.: Rejection criteria and pairwise discrimination of handwritten numerals based on structural features. Pattern Anal. Appl. 2(3), 228–238 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Luckner, M.: Comparison of hierarchical svm structures in letters recognition task. In: Rutkowski, L., Tadeusiewicz, R., Zadeh, L.A., Zurada, J. (eds.) Computational Intelligence: Methods and Applications, pp. 291–302. Challenging Problems of Science, Academic Publishing House EXIT, Warsaw (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mascarilla, L., Frélicot, C.: Reject strategies driven combination of pattern classifiers. Pattern Anal. Appl. 5(2), 234–243 (2002)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Pierce, S.G., Worden, K., Manson, G.: Evaluation of neural network performance and generalisation using thresholding functions. Neural Comput. Appl. 16, 109–124 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pillai, I., Fumera, G., Roli, F.: A classification approach with a reject option for multi-label problems. In: Maino, G., Foresti, G.L. (eds.) ICIAP (1). Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6978, pp. 98–107. Springer (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Schölkopf, B., et al.: Estimating the support of a high-dimensional distribution. Neural Comput. 13(7), 1443–1471 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Simeone, P., Marrocco, C., Tortorella, F.: Design of reject rules for ECOC classification systems. Pattern Recogn. 45(2), 863–875 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Vapnik, V.: Statistical Learning Theory. Wiley, New York (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Xie, J., Qiu, Z., Wu, J.: Bootstrap methods for reject rules of fisher LDA. Pattern Recogn. 425–428 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research is supported by the National Science Center, grant No 2012/07/B/ST6/01501, decision no UMO-2012/07/B/ST6/01501.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wladyslaw Homenda .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Homenda, W., Luckner, M., Pedrycz, W. (2016). Classification with Rejection: Concepts and Evaluations. In: Skulimowski, A., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Knowledge, Information and Creativity Support Systems: Recent Trends, Advances and Solutions. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 364. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19090-7_31

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19090-7_31

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19089-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19090-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics