Skip to main content

A Group Decision Support Technique for Critical IT Infrastructures

  • Conference paper
Theory and Engineering of Complex Systems and Dependability (DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2015)

Part of the book series: Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing ((AISC,volume 365))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1536 Accesses

Abstract

The paper presents a formal semantics of decision-making based on Dempster-Shafer belief structures. We introduced a method of decision support taking into account the subjective expert information formalized in the form of family of estimations based on the combination of hypotheses and ordered weighted average operators. The task is formulated in terms of the belief structures and allows evaluating the minimum and maximum objectives through different types of aggregation operators. In the context of critical infrastructure management, our research shows that the matrix of possible solutions can be represented as a payoff matrix including performance indicators or in the form of a risk matrix corresponding losses on the specific combinations of decisions. To ensure variation in the goals we use different types of ordering alternatives depending on the type of the specific problem. Finally, an illustrative example was given to selecting strategies and prioritizing decisions to mitigate targeted cyber intrusions fit to effective IT-security risk management in different critical application.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Finomore, V., Sitz, A., Blair, E., Rahill, K., Champion, M., Funke, G., Mancuso, V., Knott, B.: Effects of Cyber Disruption in a Distributed Team Decision Making Task. In: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, vol. 58, pp. 415–418 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhanga, Y., Huanga, S., Guob, S., Zhu, J.: Multi-sensor Data Fusion for Cyber Security Situation Awareness. Procedia Environmental Sciences 10, 1029–1034 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Zomlot, L., Sundaramurthy, S.C., Luo, K., Ou, X., Rajagopalan, S.R.: Prioritizing Intrusion Analysis Using Dempster-Shafer Theory. In: AISec 2011 Proceedings of the 4th ACM Workshop on Security and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 59–70 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hall, D.L., McMullen, S.A.H.: Mathematical Techniques in Multisensor Data Fusion, 2nd edn. Artech House, Inc. (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Yang, J.B., Singh, M.G.: An evidential reasoning approach for multiple attribute decision making with uncertainty. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics 24(1), 1–18 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Shafer, G.: A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1976)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Dubois, D., Prade, H.: Representation and combination uncertainty with belief functions and possibility measures. Computation Intelligence 4, 244–264 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lefevre, E., Colot, O., Vannoorenberghe, P.: Belief functions combination and conflict management. Information Fusion 3(2), 149–162 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Murphy, C.: Combining belief functions when evidence conflicts. Decision Support Systems 29(1), 1–9 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Smets, P.: The combination of evidence in the transferable belief model. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 12, 447–458 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Yager, R.R., Kacprzyk, J., Fedrizzi, M. (eds.): Advances in the Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., NY (1994)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Yager, R.R.: On the Dempster-Shafer framework and new combination rules. Information Science 41(2), 93–137 (1987)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Yager, R.R.: On ordered weighted averaging aggregation operators in multi-criteria decision making. IEEE Trans. Systems, Man and Cybernetics 18, 183–190 (1988)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhou, S.-M., Chiclana, F., John, R.I., Garibaldi, J.M.: α-Level Aggregation: A Practical Approach to Type-1 OWA Operation for Aggregating Uncertain Information with Applications to Breast Cancer Treatments. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 1–14 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Merigó, J.M., Gil-Lafuente, A.M.: Decision making with the OWA operator in sport management. In: XIV Congreso Español Sobre Tecnologías y Lógica Fuzzy, ESTYLF 2008, pp. 1–7 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Merigó, J.M.: Probabilistic decision making with the OWA operator and its application in investment management. In: European Society for Fuzzy Logic and Technology, EUSFLAT, pp. 1364–1369 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Deng, X., Li, Y., Deng, Y.: A group decision making method based on Dempster-Shafer theory of evidence and IOWA operator. Journal of Computaional Information Systems 8(9), 3929–3936 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Miller, S., Appleby, S.: Evolving OWA operators for cyber security decision making problems. In: IEEE Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Cyber Security (CICS), pp. 15–22 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Merigó, J.M., Gil-Lafuente, A.M.: A method for decision making with the OWA operator, http://www.doiserbia.nb.rs/img/doi/1820-0214/2012/1820-02141100044M.pdf (access date: January 2015)

  20. Torra, V., Narukawa, Y.: Modeling decisions: information fusion and aggregation operators. Springer (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Yager, R.R., Xu, Z.S.: The continuous ordered weighted geometric operator and its application to decision making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 157, 1393–1402 (2006)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Yager, R.R.: Quantifier guided aggregation using OWA operators. Int. J. of Intelligent Systems 11, 49–73 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Zadeh, L.A.: A computational approach to fuzzy quantifiers in natural languages. Computer and Mathematics with Applications 9, 149–184 (1983)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Inna Skarga-Bandurova .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Skarga-Bandurova, I., Nesterov, M., Kovalenko, Y. (2015). A Group Decision Support Technique for Critical IT Infrastructures. In: Zamojski, W., Mazurkiewicz, J., Sugier, J., Walkowiak, T., Kacprzyk, J. (eds) Theory and Engineering of Complex Systems and Dependability. DepCoS-RELCOMEX 2015. Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing, vol 365. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19216-1_42

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19216-1_42

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19215-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19216-1

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics