Skip to main content

Controversy Over the International Upper Great Lakes Study Recommendations: Pathways Towards Cooperation

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation (GDN 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing ((LNBIP,volume 218))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Unprecedented low water levels and a perception of inaction after a five-year study of the International Upper Great Lakes led activists to stir up controversy. This paper analyzes this conflict just prior to the release of the International Joint Commission’s report on April 15, 2013 and proposes resolutions towards cooperation and improved public perception.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. US Army Corps of Engineers: FINAL 2013 and Long-Terrm (1918–2013) Mean, Max & Min Monthly Mean Water Levels (Based on Gage Networks), 14 February, 2014. http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/Portals/69/docs/GreatLakesInfo/docs/WaterLevels/LTA-GLWL-Metric_2013.pdf. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  2. IUGLS: Impacts on Upper Great Lakes Water Levels: St. Clair River. Final report to the International Joint Commission. Ottawa, Canada-Washington, D.C., USA (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  3. IUGLS: Lake Superior Regulation: Addressing Uncertainty in Upper Great Lakes Water Levels. Final report to the International Joint Commission. Ottawa, Canada-Washington, D.C., USA (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  4. IJC: International Joint Commission’s Advice to Governments on the Recommendations of the International Upper Great Lakes Study. A Report to the Governments of Canada and the United States. Ottawa, Canada-Washington, D.C., USA (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Desjardins, L.: Activists denounce inaction on Great Lakes’ low water ‘crisis’. Radio Canada International, CBC, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 18 April, 2013. http://www.rcinet.ca/en/2013/04/18/activists-denounce-inaction-on-great-lakes-low-water-crisis/. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  6. Van Brenk, D.: Lakes Huron, Michigan Unusually High. The London Free Press, London (2014). http://www.lfpress.com/2014/12/19/lakes-huron-michigan-unusually-high. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  7. Martin Associates: The Economic Impacts of the Great Lakes-St. Lawrence Seaway System. Lancaster, PA: The St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation and The St. Lawrence Seaway Development Corporation (2011). http://www.greatlakes-seaway.com/en/pdf/eco_impact_full.pdf. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  8. Zebryk, N.: Water Levels and Recreation in the Great Lakes Basin. Policy Brief, Great Lakes Policy Research Network (2013). http://www.greatlakespolicyresearch.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/09/Water-Levels-Policy-Brief.pdf. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  9. Brennan, R.J.: Great Lakes water levels mean some boaters ‘playing Russian roulette’. The Star, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 18 September, 2012. http://www.thestar.com/news/canada/2012/09/18/great_lakes_water_levels_mean_some_boaters_playing_russian_roulette.html. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  10. Mackarel, K.: Why the Lakes are slowly getting less Great. The Globe and Mail, Toronto, Ontario, Canada, 25 August, 2012. http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/national/why-the-lakes-are-slowly-getting-less-great/article4499074/. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  11. International Great Lakes-St. Lawrence River Adaptive Management Task Team: Building Collaboration Across the Great Lakes-St. Lawerence River System, An Adaptive Management Plan for Addressing Extreme Water Levels, Breakdown of Roles, Responsibilities and Proposed Tasks. Final Report to the International Joint Commission. Ottawa, Canada-Washington, D.C., USA (2013). http://ijc.org/files/tinymce/uploaded/documents/reportsAndPublications/FinalReport_Adaptive%20Management%20Plan_20130530.pdf. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  12. US Army Corps of Engineers: Great Lakes Water Levels (1918–2013). http://www.lre.usace.army.mil/Portals/69/docs/GreatLakesInfo/docs/WaterLevels/LTA-GLWL-Graph_2013.pdf. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  13. Chamber of Marine Commerce: Great Lakes Lock Infrastructure (2014). http://www.marinedelivers.com/great-lakes-lock-infrastructure. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  14. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M.: Interactive Decision Making: The Graph Model for Conflict Resolution. Wiley, New York (1993)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kameda, H., Altman, E., Touati, C., Legrand, A.: Nash equilibrium based fairness. Math. Meth. Oper. Res. 76(1), 43–65 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Porter, C.: Georgian Bay loses water while International Joint Commission does nothing. The Star, Toronto, Ontario, 19 September, 2012. http://www.thestar.com/news/ontario/2012/09/19/georgian_bay_loses_water_while_international_joint_commission_does_nothing.html. Accessed 31 December, 2014

  17. Schlozberg, R., Dorling, R., Spiro, P.: Low Water Blues: An Economic Impact Assessment of Future Low Water Levels in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River. Mowat Centre and Council of the Great Lakes Region, Toronto, Ontario, Canada (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  18. St. Lawrence Seaway Management Corporation: Delivering Economic Value: Annual Report 2011–2012, Cornwall, Ontario, Canada (2012). http://www.greatlakes-seaway.com/en/pdf/slsmc_ar2012_nar_en.pdf. Accessed 15 October, 2014

  19. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Peng, X.: A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 1: model formulation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 33(1), 42–55 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fang, L., Hipel, K.W., Kilgour, D.M., Peng, X.: A decision support system for interactive decision making, part 2: analysis and output interpretation. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. Part C 33(1), 56–66 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Nies, J.: It will take all our efforts to restore the Great Lakes. Manitoulin Expositor, Manitoulin Island, Ontario, Canada, 3 July, 2013. http://www.manitoulin.ca/2013/07/03/it-will-take-all-of-our-efforts-to-restore-the-great-lakes/. Accessed 1 January, 2015

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Monika Karnis .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Karnis, M., Bristow, M., Fang, L. (2015). Controversy Over the International Upper Great Lakes Study Recommendations: Pathways Towards Cooperation. In: Kamiński, B., Kersten, G., Szapiro, T. (eds) Outlooks and Insights on Group Decision and Negotiation. GDN 2015. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, vol 218. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_20

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19515-5_20

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19514-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19515-5

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics