Skip to main content

Using Sensitivity Analysis to Facilitate the Maintenance of Safety Cases

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Book cover Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2015 (Ada-Europe 2015)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 9111))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

A safety case contains safety arguments together with supporting evidence that together should demonstrate that a system is acceptably safe. System changes pose a challenge to the soundness and cogency of the safety case argument. Maintaining safety arguments is a painstaking process because it requires performing a change impact analysis through interdependent elements. Changes are often performed years after the deployment of a system making it harder for safety case developers to know which parts of the argument are affected. Contracts have been proposed as a means for helping to manage changes. There has been significant work that discusses how to represent and to use them but there has been little on how to derive them. In this paper, we propose a sensitivity analysis approach to derive contracts from Fault Tree Analyses and use them to trace changes in the safety argument, thus facilitating easier maintenance of the safety argument.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. SAE ARP4761 Guidelines and Methods for Conducting the Safety Assessment Process on Civil Airborne Systems and Equipment, December 1996

    Google Scholar 

  2. Modular software safety case (MSSC) – process description, November 2012. https://www.amsderisc.com/related-programmes/

  3. Benvenuti, L., Ferrari, A., Mazzi, E., Vincentelli, A.L.S.: Contract-based design for computation and verification of a closed-loop hybrid system. In: Egerstedt, M., Mishra, B. (eds.) HSCC 2008. LNCS, vol. 4981, pp. 58–71. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Cullen, A., Frey, H.: Probabilistic techniques in Exposure assessment. Plenum Press, New York (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Fenn, J.L., Hawkins, R.D., Williams, P., Kelly, T.P., Banner, M.G., Oakshott, Y.: The who, where, how, why and when of modular and incremental certification. In: Proceedings of the 2nd IET International Conference on System Safety, pp. 135–140. IET (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. GSN Community Standard: Version 1; (c) 2011 Origin Consulting (York) Limited. http://www.goalstructuringnotation.info/

  7. ISO 26262:2011. Road Vehicles – Functional Safety, Part 1–9. International Organization for Standardization, November 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Jaradat, O., Graydon, P.J., Bate, I.: An approach to maintaining safety case evidence after a system change. In: Proceedings of the 10th European Dependable Computing Conference (EDCC), August 2014

    Google Scholar 

  9. Kelly, T.: Literature survey for work on evolvable safety cases. Department of Computer Sceince, University of York, 1st Year Qualifying Dissertation (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A.: A systematic approach to safety case maintenance. In: Felici, M., Kanoun, K., Pasquini, A. (eds.) SAFECOMP 1999. LNCS, vol. 1698, pp. 13–26. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Lisagor, O., Pretzer, M., Seguin, C., Pumfrey, D.J., Iwu, F., Peikenkamp, T.: Towards safety analysis of highly integrated technologically heterogeneous systems - a domain-based approach for modelling system failure logic. In: The 24th International System Safety Conference (ISSC), Albuquerque, USA (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Meyer, B.: Object-Oriented Software Construction, 1st edn. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Pannell, D.J.: Sensitivity analysis of normative economic models: theoretical framework and practical strategies. Agricultural Economics 16(2), 139–152 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Rausand, M., Høyland, A.: System Reliability Theory: Models, Statistical Methods and Applications. Wiley-Interscience, Hoboken (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Wilson, S.P., Kelly, T.P., McDermid, J.A.: Safety case development: current practice, future prospects. In: proc. of Software Bases Systems - 12th Annual CSR Workshop. Springer-Verlag (1997)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Omar Jaradat .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Jaradat, O., Bate, I., Punnekkat, S. (2015). Using Sensitivity Analysis to Facilitate the Maintenance of Safety Cases. In: de la Puente, J., Vardanega, T. (eds) Reliable Software Technologies – Ada-Europe 2015. Ada-Europe 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9111. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19584-1_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-19584-1_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-19583-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-19584-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics